Compare IBM Engineering Test Management and Postman 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Free
IBM Engineering Test Management
Star Rating
(25)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 4 pricing plansPostman
Star Rating
(1,738)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Postman excels in user experience, with many users praising its intuitive interface that makes API testing straightforward, even for beginners. In contrast, IBM Engineering Test Management, while powerful, can be more complex to navigate, which may lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users say that Postman’s scripting capabilities significantly enhance its functionality, allowing for complex request chaining and automated testing. This feature is highlighted as a game-changer for developers, whereas IBM Engineering Test Management, while robust in test management, may not offer the same level of automation flexibility.
- Reviewers mention that Postman provides quick results and efficient testing workflows, which is particularly beneficial for teams needing rapid feedback during development. On the other hand, IBM Engineering Test Management is noted for its comprehensive test planning and tracking features, making it ideal for larger, more complex projects but potentially slower in execution.
- According to verified reviews, Postman has a significantly higher satisfaction score, reflecting its strong market presence and user approval. Users appreciate the ease of setup and the ability to get started without extensive training, while IBM Engineering Test Management, despite its strengths, has received mixed feedback regarding its implementation process.
- G2 reviewers highlight that IBM Engineering Test Management is particularly effective for enterprise-level projects, with features that support Agile planning and traceability across multiple tools. However, this specialization may not be as relevant for mid-market users, who might find Postman’s more streamlined approach better suited to their needs.
- Users express that the quality of support for Postman is generally higher, with many noting responsive customer service and helpful resources. In contrast, while IBM Engineering Test Management has its strengths, some users have reported challenges in receiving timely support, which can impact their overall experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
Postman
Free Plan
Free
For individuals or a small team of 3 or less to start testing APIs.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
Free Trial
IBM Engineering Test Management
No trial information availablePostman
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
9
9.3
1,358
Ease of Use
7.2
9
9.2
1,376
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
9.3
622
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
9.0
189
Quality of Support
7.5
8
8.7
1,128
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
9.0
161
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
9.2
1,316
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
8.8
131
Not enough data
9.1
133
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.8
125
Security Testing
Not enough data
8.6
124
Not enough data
9.4
129
Not enough data
9.5
135
Security Management
Not enough data
8.8
121
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
7.9
120
Development
Not enough data
9.5
562
Not enough data
8.7
499
Not enough data
8.7
478
Not enough data
8.8
496
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.8
504
Not enough data
8.8
488
Not enough data
8.9
499
Functionality
Not enough data
9.4
30
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
8.9
29
Not enough data
9.5
29
Usability
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.0
15
Integration - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Development - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.6
350
Not enough data
8.8
281
Not enough data
8.8
256
Not enough data
8.8
267
Collaboration - API Platforms
Not enough data
8.9
286
Not enough data
8.8
264
Not enough data
8.6
254
API Management - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.0
265
Not enough data
8.4
259
Not enough data
8.5
254
Not enough data
8.9
267
Not enough data
8.2
251
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
8.1
167
Not enough data
8.0
163
Not enough data
8.1
164
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
9.5
836
Not enough data
8.7
709
Not enough data
8.7
649
Not enough data
8.7
358
API Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
754
Not enough data
8.9
723
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
632
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.8
665
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management and Postman are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management is categorized as Automation Testing and Test Management
Postman is categorized as Service Virtualization, API Platforms, API Development, API Security, API Management, Build Automation, and AI Agent Builders
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Test Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Postman
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Automotive
16.7%
Computer Software
11.1%
Warehousing
5.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Computer Software
35.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.3%
Financial Services
3.3%
Banking
2.0%
Internet
1.8%
Other
27.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Engineering Test Management has no discussions with answers
What is Postman used for?
7 Comments
KK
Personnaly i used postman for connect multiple softwares through API.Read more
Is it possible to make such a service in the form of a Web App ?
3 Comments
VN
Hey Shrini,
We recently launched Postman on the Web feature to use on a browser. Make sure to install the Postman Agent file to bypass any CORDS...Read more
Is there any alternative?
3 Comments
LP
There exists Postwoman as an alternative:
https://postwoman.ioRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
