Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Engineering Test Management and Postman 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Free
IBM Engineering Test Management
Star Rating
(25)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 4 pricing plansPostman
Star Rating
(1,638)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that IBM Engineering Test Management excels in test coverage with a score of 9.4, allowing teams to ensure comprehensive testing across various scenarios, while Postman also performs well in API testing with a score of 9.6, making it a strong choice for developers focused on API functionality.
- Reviewers mention that Postman offers superior ease of use with a score of 9.1 compared to IBM Engineering Test Management's 7.2, indicating that users find Postman more intuitive for managing API requests and testing workflows.
- G2 users highlight that IBM Engineering Test Management provides robust test repository features, which are essential for enterprise-level testing, while Postman shines in API monitoring with a score of 9.5, making it ideal for teams that prioritize real-time API performance tracking.
- Users on G2 note that IBM Engineering Test Management has a strong focus on test diversity and simulation quality, scoring 9.4, which is crucial for teams needing to simulate various user scenarios, whereas Postman is praised for its API construction capabilities, scoring 9.4, which helps streamline the development process.
- Reviewers mention that while IBM Engineering Test Management has a higher score in ease of setup (9.0), Postman’s free entry-level pricing and extensive community support make it an attractive option for mid-market users looking for cost-effective solutions.
- Users say that IBM Engineering Test Management's quality of support, rated at 7.5, could improve, especially when compared to Postman's higher support rating of 8.7, indicating that users may find more responsive assistance with Postman.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management
Free Trial
0.00
USD
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
Postman
Free Plan
Free
For individuals or a small team of 3 or less to start testing APIs.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
Free Trial
IBM Engineering Test Management
No trial information availablePostman
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
9
9.3
1,293
Ease of Use
7.2
9
9.1
1,308
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
9.3
554
Ease of Admin
9.3
5
8.9
180
Quality of Support
7.5
8
8.7
1,074
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
9.0
152
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
9.2
1,253
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
8.8
147
Not enough data
9.1
149
Not enough data
8.7
145
Not enough data
8.7
141
Security Testing
Not enough data
8.7
140
Not enough data
9.4
143
Not enough data
9.5
146
Security Management
Not enough data
8.8
137
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.0
135
Development
Not enough data
9.5
559
Not enough data
8.8
514
Not enough data
8.7
494
Not enough data
8.8
508
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.8
521
Not enough data
8.8
498
Not enough data
8.9
511
Functionality
Not enough data
9.4
31
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
9.6
30
Usability
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
9.0
31
Not enough data
9.5
33
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
8.0
16
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.0
15
Integration - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Development - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.4
300
Not enough data
8.9
290
Not enough data
8.7
280
Not enough data
8.8
284
Collaboration - API Platforms
Not enough data
8.8
284
Not enough data
8.7
282
Not enough data
8.6
276
API Management - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.0
285
Not enough data
8.4
281
Not enough data
8.5
275
Not enough data
8.9
279
Not enough data
8.3
272
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
8.1
175
Not enough data
8.0
175
Not enough data
8.2
176
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
9.5
823
Not enough data
8.7
725
Not enough data
8.6
668
Not enough data
8.8
374
API Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
760
Not enough data
8.9
738
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
647
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.8
680
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management and Postman are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Test Management is categorized as Automation Testing and Test Management
Postman is categorized as Service Virtualization, API Platforms, API Development, API Security, API Management, Build Automation, and AI Agent Builders
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Test Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Postman
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
33.3%
Automotive
16.7%
Computer Software
11.1%
Warehousing
5.6%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Computer Software
35.0%
Information Technology and Services
30.7%
Financial Services
3.2%
Banking
2.0%
Internet
1.8%
Other
27.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Engineering Test Management has no discussions with answers
What is Postman used for?
6 Comments
KK
Personnaly i used postman for connect multiple softwares through API.Read more
Is it possible to make such a service in the form of a Web App ?
3 Comments
VN
Hey Shrini,
We recently launched Postman on the Web feature to use on a browser. Make sure to install the Postman Agent file to bypass any CORDS...Read more
Is there any alternative?
3 Comments
LP
There exists Postwoman as an alternative:
https://postwoman.ioRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
