# IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next vs Polarion Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- According to verified reviews, **Polarion** stands out for its user-friendly interface, with many users praising its intuitive design that makes navigation and task management straightforward. In contrast, some users of **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** have reported challenges with configuration, indicating that it may require a steeper learning curve.
- G2 reviewers report that **Polarion** excels in customization options, allowing teams to easily adapt the software to their specific needs. Users appreciate the ability to add new types and properties effortlessly, which enhances their workflow. Meanwhile, **IBM DOORS Next** is noted for its flexible publishing capabilities, particularly beneficial for industries requiring compliance with strict standards.
- Reviewers mention that **Polarion** has a quicker implementation process, which is a significant advantage for teams looking to get started without extensive delays. In contrast, users of **IBM DOORS Next** have expressed that the setup can be more complex, potentially leading to longer onboarding times.
- Users say that **Polarion** provides excellent support, with a quality of assistance that enhances the overall user experience. On the other hand, while **IBM DOORS Next** has received positive feedback regarding its support, some users feel that it could be improved to match the level of service offered by Polarion.
- Reviewers highlight that **IBM DOORS Next** offers strong traceability features, which are crucial for industries like aerospace and defense. This capability is often cited as a key strength, helping teams maintain compliance and oversight. However, **Polarion** also provides robust traceability, though users have noted that it may not be as comprehensive in certain specialized contexts.
- According to recent user feedback, **Polarion** is praised for its web-based architecture, making it easy to manage on the server side and accessible from various devices. In contrast, **IBM DOORS Next** is recognized for its scalability, which is essential for larger enterprises, but some users have indicated that its web capabilities could be enhanced.



---
## Frequently Asked Questions

### What is the difference between IBM Engineering... vs Polarion?

Polarion stands out over IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next with higher reviewer ratings, easier setup, and stronger support scores.

| [IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next/reviews) | [Polarion](https://www.g2.com/products/polarion/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.0/5 (136 reviews) | 4.2/5 (161 reviews) |
| Enterprise | Enterprise |
| 6.2 | 7.7 |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Flexibility | — |



### How do the pricing models of IBM Engineering... and Polarion compare?

Polarion is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its pricing compared to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

- **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next:** In recent reviews, several reviewers cite cost as a concern and mention the product is expensive for startups and smaller companies.
- **Polarion:** Reviewers note that while Polarion is also considered expensive, satisfaction with its value is higher, and cost is less frequently cited as a barrier.



### What are the best alternatives to IBM Engineering... and Polarion?

The top 3 alternatives to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next and Polarion are codebeamer, Perforce ALM, and Jama Connect.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next/reviews) | 4.0/5 (136) | Enterprise | Cost is a concern for smaller companies | Flexibility |
| [Polarion](https://www.g2.com/products/polarion/reviews) | 4.2/5 (161) | Enterprise | Expensive but higher value satisfaction | Traceability |
| [codebeamer](https://www.g2.com/products/codebeamer/reviews) | 4.3/5 (141) | Mid-Market | — | — |
| [Perforce ALM](https://www.g2.com/products/perforce-alm/reviews) | 4.1/5 (102) | Mid-Market | — | — |



### Which ALM Software features should I prioritize when comparing IBM Engineering... and Polarion?

Buyers should prioritize traceability, ease of setup, integration capabilities, support quality, and flexibility when comparing IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next and Polarion.

- **Traceability:** IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (all-time mentions: 1), Polarion (reviewers consistently highlight traceability as a core benefit).
- **Ease of Setup:** IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (6.2), Polarion (7.7).
- **Integration Capabilities:** Polarion (Teamcenter: 21 all-time mentions, Jira: 12 all-time mentions); IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (integration capabilities mentioned in recent reviews).
- **Support Quality:** IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (7.7), Polarion (8.1).
- **Flexibility:** IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (all-time mentions: 1), Polarion (reviewers cite configurability and template flexibility).



### What are the pros and cons of IBM Engineering... vs Polarion?

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next is recognized for its flexibility, while Polarion is praised for traceability and ease of use.

- **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next strengths:** Flexibility (all-time mentions: 1), strong traceability, robust document publishing, and scalability for complex engineering projects.
- **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next trade-offs:** Cost concerns for smaller companies, steep learning curve, process inefficiency (all-time mentions: 1), missing features (all-time mentions: 1), and user difficulty (all-time mentions: 1).
- **Polarion strengths:** Traceability, ease of setup (7.7), integration with Teamcenter and Jira, and high support satisfaction (8.1).
- **Polarion trade-offs:** Reviewers mention complexity in integration with some Siemens products and a user interface that could be more modern.



### Is IBM Engineering... or Polarion better for small businesses?

Neither IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next nor Polarion is primarily targeted at small businesses, but reviewers cite cost and scalability as greater challenges for IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next in smaller organizations.

- **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers note high cost and scalability issues for startups and small companies.
- **Polarion:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers mention expense but cite higher satisfaction with value and easier setup for new users.



### Which ALM Software platform has better integrations?

Polarion is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing frequent and successful connections to Teamcenter and Jira.

- **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next:** Reviewers mention integration capabilities, but no third-party tool is cited with a publishable all-time count.
- **Polarion:** Teamcenter (21 all-time mentions), Jira (12 all-time mentions), and LIMS (recent reviews) are frequently cited as integrated tools.



### How do IBM Engineering... and Polarion compare on customer support?

Polarion leads IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next in Quality of Support by 0.4 points, with scores of 8.1 versus 7.7.

- **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive, with several citing helpful customer service but occasional delays.
- **Polarion:** Reviewers consistently praise support quality, noting prompt responses and effective assistance, though a few mention the support model could be improved.



### Which is easier to implement, IBM Engineering... or Polarion?

Polarion is easier to implement than IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next, with a 1.5-point higher Ease of Setup score (7.7 vs 6.2).

- **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next:** Reviewers note a steep learning curve and challenges in setup, especially for teams without prior experience.
- **Polarion:** Reviewers highlight straightforward initial setup, easier onboarding, and user-friendly deployment, with several citing quick implementation even for large groups.



| | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.0 out of 5 | 4.2 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 136 | 161 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (59.3% of reviews) | Enterprise (50.3% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | 0.00 USD | Starting at $42.00 Per Month | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

Pros:
- Data Management (1 reviews)
- Documentation (1 reviews)

Cons:
- Missing Features (1 reviews)
- Process Inefficiency (1 reviews)

### Polarion

Pros:
- Ease of Use (8 reviews)
- Customizability (6 reviews)

Cons:
- Learning Curve (4 reviews)
- Complexity (3 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.1 (93 reviews) | 8.8 (52 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 7.4 (95 reviews) | 8.1 (135 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 6.2 (51 reviews) | 7.8 (112 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 6.9 (51 reviews) | 7.9 (26 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 7.7 (87 reviews) | 8.3 (47 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 7.4 (51 reviews) | 8.5 (26 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 8.1 (88 reviews) | 8.5 (48 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Free Trial

Price: 0.00 USD

Key Features:
- 45-day trial with no commitment and no credit card

[Browse all 4 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next/pricing)

#### Free Trial

No

### Polarion

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Polarion X Base

Price: Starting at $42.00 Per Month

Key Features:
- 1x reviewers per liscence
- 500 documents & pages 
- 25,000 work items

[Browse all 3 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/polarion/pricing)

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### ALM Software

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | N/A | N/A |
| **Polarion** | 9.2/10 | 54 |

#### Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Testing/QA Management** | Not enough data | 9.2 (22 reviews) | 
| **Traceability** | Not enough data | 9.6 (27 reviews) | 
| **Requirements Management** | Not enough data | 9.8 (42 reviews) | 
| **Release Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Issue Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Change Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Lifecycle Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Deliverables Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **File Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Knowledge Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Iteration Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Organization - ALM Software

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Reporting** | Not enough data | 9.3 (14 reviews) | 
| **Collaboration** | Not enough data | 8.6 (22 reviews) | 
| **Project Planning** | Not enough data | 8.5 (12 reviews) | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Bug Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Synchronization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Library Maintenance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Agile Methodologies** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Prioritization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Baseline Manager** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Run Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Data** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Conflict Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Case Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **For Developers** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Review** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Code Promotion** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Version Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Status Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Storage** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting & Statistics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Monitoring** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Administrator Level Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Defect Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Automatic Test Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Alerts/Notifications** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Requirements Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | 8.9/10 | 25 |
| **Polarion** | 9.2/10 | 51 |

#### Requirements Authoring and Structure - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Structured Requirements Authoring** | Not enough data | 9.5 (22 reviews) | 
| **Hierarchical Requirements Organization** | Not enough data | 9.9 (18 reviews) | 

#### Compliance and Governance - Requirement Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Regulated Industry Standards Support** | Not enough data | 9.8 (16 reviews) | 

#### Administration

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Requirements Listing** | 8.9 (21 reviews) | 9.3 (29 reviews) | 
| **Centralized Information** | 9.3 (22 reviews) | 8.7 (27 reviews) | 
| **Traceability** | 9.2 (22 reviews) | 9.5 (31 reviews) | 

#### Collaboration and Review - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Review and Approval Workflows** | Not enough data | 9.0 (16 reviews) | 
| **Role-Based Access Control** | Not enough data | 9.8 (15 reviews) | 

#### Communication

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Stakeholder Communication** | 8.6 (21 reviews) | 8.4 (22 reviews) | 
| **Internal Communication Enablement** | 8.7 (21 reviews) | 8.4 (25 reviews) | 

#### Role-Based Access Co - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Baselining** | Not enough data | 9.7 (16 reviews) | 

#### Procedural

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Automated Creation & Testing** | 8.7 (20 reviews) | 8.2 (19 reviews) | 

#### Traceability - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Bidirectional Traceability** | Not enough data | 9.5 (17 reviews) | 
| **Impact Analysis** | Not enough data | 9.1 (15 reviews) | 
| **Traceability Matrix Generation** | Not enough data | 9.4 (15 reviews) | 

#### AI Traceability - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Suspect Link Detection** | Not enough data | 9.4 (15 reviews) | 

#### Integration - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **ALM and Project Management Tool Integration** | Not enough data | 8.9 (22 reviews) | 

#### Change Management and Version Control - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Complete Audit Trail** | Not enough data | 9.3 (18 reviews) | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Document Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Review** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Visualization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **File Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Stakeholder Defined Attributes** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Lifecycle Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Storage** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Communication Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Compliance Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Application Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Data** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Version Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Status Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Commenting/Notes** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Fields** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Progress Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Projections** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Updates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Bug Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Workflow** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Prioritization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **To-Do List** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Templates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Assessment Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Change Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Configurable Workflow** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Agile Methodologies** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Reports** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Budgeting/Forecasting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Template Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **@mentions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Progress Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multiple Projects** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Product Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | 8.4/10 | 57 |
| **Polarion** | N/A | N/A |

#### Communication

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Wiki Documentation** | 8.1 (35 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Community Forum** | 8.6 (34 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Customer Ideation** | 8.4 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **NPS of Customers** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Planning

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Work Capacity** | 8.6 (37 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Task Ranking** | 8.6 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Kanban Board** | 8.4 (33 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Custom Workflows** | 8.5 (38 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Release Forecasting** | 8.3 (37 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Projections** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Prioritization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Workflow Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Time Tracking** | 8.5 (35 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Progress Monitoring** | 8.6 (39 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Budgeting** | 8.1 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Team Scorecard** | 8.3 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Progress Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Status Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Milestone Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Progress Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Task Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Updates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Product Lifecycle Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Communication Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Notifications** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Resource Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Planning Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Commenting/Notes** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Fields** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Calendar Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Scheduling** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **@mentions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multiple Projects** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting & Statistics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Single Sign On** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Storage** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Release Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customer Journey Mapping** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Gantt/Timeline View** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Email Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **To-Do List** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Surveys & Feedback** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Deadline Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Product Roadmapping** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Idea Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Data** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Agile Methodologies** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Timeline Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **File Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Templates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Feedback Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Tagging** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Template Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Guest Access** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Visualization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (2):** [ALM Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/alm-software), [Requirements Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/requirements-management)

**Unique to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (1):** [Product Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/product-management-software)



---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Polarion | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 13.0% | 17.8% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 27.6% | 31.8% | 
| **Enterprise** | 59.3% | 50.3% | 

### By Industry

#### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- **Information Technology and Services:** 17.9%
- **Automotive:** 13.8%
- **Aviation & Aerospace:** 11.4%
- **Defense & Space:** 10.6%
- **Computer Software:** 4.9%
- **Insurance:** 4.1%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 3.3%
- **Financial Services:** 2.4%
- **Government Administration:** 2.4%
- **Industrial Automation:** 2.4%
- **Other:** 26.8%

#### Polarion

- **Automotive:** 16.9%
- **Airlines/Aviation:** 8.1%
- **Semiconductors:** 8.1%
- **Medical Devices:** 8.1%
- **Computer Software:** 7.4%
- **Aviation & Aerospace:** 6.8%
- **Consulting:** 4.7%
- **Mechanical or Industrial Engineering:** 4.1%
- **Industrial Automation:** 4.1%
- **Oil & Energy:** 3.4%
- **Other:** 28.4%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- [codebeamer](https://www.g2.com/products/codebeamer/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (141 reviews)
- [Perforce ALM](https://www.g2.com/products/perforce-alm/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (102 reviews)
- [Jira](https://www.g2.com/products/jira/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (7970 reviews)
- [Jama Connect](https://www.g2.com/products/jama-connect/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (225 reviews)
- [ClickUp](https://www.g2.com/products/clickup/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (14276 reviews)
- [Aha!](https://www.g2.com/products/aha/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (367 reviews)
- [Asana](https://www.g2.com/products/asana/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (13966 reviews)
- [Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/products/altium-develop/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (1070 reviews)
- [Miro](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (13569 reviews)
- [Airtable](https://www.g2.com/products/airtable/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (3293 reviews)

### Alternatives to Polarion

- [codebeamer](https://www.g2.com/products/codebeamer/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (141 reviews)
- [Perforce ALM](https://www.g2.com/products/perforce-alm/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (102 reviews)
- [Jama Connect](https://www.g2.com/products/jama-connect/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (225 reviews)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (133 reviews)
- [Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/products/altium-develop/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (1070 reviews)
- [Tuleap](https://www.g2.com/products/tuleap/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (20 reviews)
- [Windchill](https://www.g2.com/products/ptc-windchill/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (121 reviews)
- [IBM Engineering Workflow Management](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-workflow-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (50 reviews)
- [SpiraTeam](https://www.g2.com/products/spirateam/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (32 reviews)
- [SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/products/spiratest/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (63 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- Title: [What is the subscriptions fee for DOORS Next Generation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/subscriptions-fee) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "DOORS Next “Generation” hasn’t existed as a product name for years. Pricing depends on whether Subscription on SaaS or on premise. On premise licenses cover..."
- Title: [Is there a site where I can find more details on DOORS Next Generation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/additional-details) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "The official IBM Requirements Management page that contains the solution brief and other resources can be found here...."

### Polarion

No discussions available for this product.

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next-vs-polarion)