# IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next vs Jira Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- **G2 reviewers report** that Jira excels in user satisfaction, with many praising its **powerful workflow customization** features. Users appreciate the ability to set up stages like QA before tasks are marked as complete, which helps prevent costly errors in project management.
- **Users say** that Jira's implementation process is notably quick and intuitive, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to get started without extensive setup time. This ease of use is highlighted by its strong ratings in user experience, particularly for managing diverse projects across different departments.
- **Reviewers mention** that IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next is particularly beneficial for industries requiring strict compliance, such as aerospace and automotive. Its **flexible publishing capabilities** allow users to effectively manage and transform data into customer deliverables, which is a significant advantage in regulated environments.
- **According to verified reviews** , Jira provides excellent visibility into task ownership and overall progress, making it a reliable tool for cross-functional collaboration. Users have found it especially useful for managing marketing projects and customer onboarding, showcasing its versatility beyond software development.
- **G2 reviewers highlight** that while DOORS Next offers a comprehensive view of the software development lifecycle, it faces challenges in user experience compared to Jira. Users have noted that its setup can be more complex, which may hinder quick adoption for teams not familiar with its interface.
- **Users report** that Jira's community support and documentation are robust, contributing to a smoother user experience. The active community forum and detailed wiki documentation help users troubleshoot issues and share best practices, which contrasts with the more limited recent feedback for DOORS Next.



| | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.0 out of 5 | 4.3 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 136 | 7,889 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (59.3% of reviews) | Mid-Market (43.7% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | 0.00 USD | Free 10 Users Per Month | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

Pros:
- Data Management (1 reviews)
- Documentation (1 reviews)

Cons:
- Missing Features (1 reviews)
- Process Inefficiency (1 reviews)

### Jira

Pros:
- Ease of Use (1157 reviews)
- Project Management (857 reviews)

Cons:
- Learning Curve (682 reviews)
- Complexity (504 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.1 (93 reviews) | 8.9 (6386 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 7.4 (95 reviews) | 8.1 (6482 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 6.2 (51 reviews) | 8.1 (2658 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 6.9 (51 reviews) | 7.7 (1758 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 7.7 (87 reviews) | 8.4 (5019 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 7.4 (51 reviews) | 8.6 (1621 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 8.1 (88 reviews) | 8.5 (6163 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Free Trial

Price: 0.00 USD

Key Features:
- 45-day trial with no commitment and no credit card

[Browse all 4 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next/pricing)

#### Free Trial

No

### Jira

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Free

Price: Free 10 Users Per Month

Description: Free forever for 10 users

Key Features:
- Unlimited goals, projects, tasks, and forms
- Backlog, list, board, timeline, calendar, and summary views
- Reports and dashboards

[Browse all 4 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/jira/pricing)

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Project Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | N/A | N/A |
| **Jira** | 8.4/10 | 1017 |

#### Tasks

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Creation & Assignment** | Not enough data | 9.3 (717 reviews) | 
| **Due Dates** | Not enough data | 9.0 (651 reviews) | 
| **Task Prioritization** | Not enough data | 9.2 (679 reviews) | 
| **To-Do Lists** | Not enough data | 8.8 (623 reviews) | 
| **Dependencies** | Not enough data | 8.5 (583 reviews) | 
| **Mass Updates** | Not enough data | 8.2 (560 reviews) | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | 8.5 (591 reviews) | 
| **Recurring Tasks** | Not enough data | 8.4 (507 reviews) | 

#### Projects

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Planning** | Not enough data | 8.9 (619 reviews) | 
| **Project Map** | Not enough data | 8.7 (554 reviews) | 
| **GANTT** | Not enough data | 8.2 (525 reviews) | 
| **Calendar View** | Not enough data | 8.4 (537 reviews) | 
| **Views** | Not enough data | 8.6 (549 reviews) | 
| **Project Budgeting** | Not enough data | 7.7 (466 reviews) | 
| **Issue Tracking** | Not enough data | 9.3 (621 reviews) | 
| **Templates** | Not enough data | 8.3 (522 reviews) | 
| **Critical Path** | Not enough data | 8.0 (455 reviews) | 
| **Time & Expense** | Not enough data | 8.1 (481 reviews) | 
| **Methodologies** | Not enough data | 8.7 (546 reviews) | 

#### Resource Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Resource Definiton** | Not enough data | 8.3 (496 reviews) | 
| **Capacity** | Not enough data | 8.3 (523 reviews) | 
| **Scheduling** | Not enough data | 8.4 (511 reviews) | 

#### Project Monitoring

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Baselining / KPIs** | Not enough data | 8.4 (499 reviews) | 
| **Resource Allocation** | Not enough data | 8.4 (510 reviews) | 
| **Dashboards** | Not enough data | 8.8 (579 reviews) | 

#### Generative AI

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **AI Text Generation** | Not enough data | 7.4 (434 reviews) | 
| **AI Text Summarization** | Not enough data | 7.5 (433 reviews) | 

#### Agentic AI - Project Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | 7.4 (300 reviews) | 
| **Multi-step Planning** | Not enough data | 7.7 (301 reviews) | 
| **Cross-system Integration** | Not enough data | 7.9 (331 reviews) | 
| **Adaptive Learning** | Not enough data | 7.6 (298 reviews) | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | Not enough data | 7.5 (303 reviews) | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | 7.4 (299 reviews) | 
| **Decision Making** | Not enough data | 7.8 (313 reviews) | 

### Bug Tracking

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | N/A | N/A |
| **Jira** | 8.4/10 | 2188 |

#### Bug Reporting

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **User Reports & Feedback** | Not enough data | 8.8 (1775 reviews) | 
| **Tester Reports & Feedback** | Not enough data | 8.7 (1729 reviews) | 
| **Team Reports & Comments** | Not enough data | 8.9 (1822 reviews) | 

#### Bug Monitoring

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Analytics** | Not enough data | 8.6 (1720 reviews) | 
| **Bug History** | Not enough data | 8.9 (1847 reviews) | 
| **Data Retention** | Not enough data | 8.8 (1699 reviews) | 

#### Agentic AI - Bug Tracking

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Adaptive Learning** | Not enough data | 7.6 (247 reviews) | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | Not enough data | 7.7 (249 reviews) | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | 7.6 (247 reviews) | 

### AI Agents For Business Operations

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | N/A | N/A |
| **Jira** | 9.3/10 | 78 |

#### Responses

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Personalization** | Not enough data | 9.6 (37 reviews) | 
| **Route To Human** | Not enough data | 9.4 (38 reviews) | 
| **Natural Language Understanding (NLU)** | Not enough data | 9.5 (37 reviews) | 

#### Automation - AI Agents

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Sales Follow-Up** | Not enough data | 9.0 (36 reviews) | 
| **Customer Interaction Automation** | Not enough data | 9.2 (35 reviews) | 
| **Lead Generation** | Not enough data | 9.1 (36 reviews) | 
| **Document Processing** | Not enough data | 9.5 (38 reviews) | 
| **Feedback Collection** | Not enough data | 9.4 (37 reviews) | 

#### Platform

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Conversation Editor** | Not enough data | 9.5 (37 reviews) | 
| **Integration** | Not enough data | 9.5 (42 reviews) | 
| **Human-In-The-Loop** | Not enough data | 9.4 (38 reviews) | 

#### Autonomy -  AI Agents

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Independent Decision Making** | Not enough data | 9.1 (36 reviews) | 
| **Adaptive Responses** | Not enough data | 9.2 (36 reviews) | 
| **Task Execution** | Not enough data | 9.3 (36 reviews) | 
| **Problem Solving** | Not enough data | 9.2 (37 reviews) | 

#### Generative AI

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **AI Text Generation** | Not enough data | 9.2 (42 reviews) | 
| **AI Text Summarization** | Not enough data | 9.3 (37 reviews) | 

### ALM Software

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | N/A | N/A |
| **Jira** | N/A | N/A |

#### Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Test Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Traceability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Organization - ALM Software

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Reporting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Requirements Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | 8.9/10 | 25 |
| **Jira** | N/A | N/A |

#### Requirements Authoring and Structure - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Structured Requirements Authoring** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Hierarchical Requirements Organization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Compliance and Governance - Requirement Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Regulated Industry Standards Support** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Administration

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Requirements Listing** | 8.9 (21 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Centralized Information** | 9.3 (22 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Traceability** | 9.2 (22 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Collaboration and Review - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Review and Approval Workflows** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Role-Based Access Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Communication

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Stakeholder Communication** | 8.6 (21 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Internal Communication Enablement** | 8.7 (21 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Role-Based Access Co - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Baselining** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Procedural

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Automated Creation & Testing** | 8.7 (20 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Traceability - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Bidirectional Traceability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Impact Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Traceability Matrix Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### AI Traceability - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Suspect Link Detection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Integration - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **ALM and Project Management Tool Integration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Change Management and Version Control - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Complete Audit Trail** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Product Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | 8.4/10 | 57 |
| **Jira** | 8.5/10 | 4299 |

#### Communication

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Wiki Documentation** | 8.1 (35 reviews) | 8.4 (2685 reviews) | 
| **Community Forum** | 8.6 (34 reviews) | 8.2 (2528 reviews) | 
| **Customer Ideation** | 8.4 (36 reviews) | 8.1 (2433 reviews) | 

#### Planning

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Work Capacity** | 8.6 (37 reviews) | 8.7 (3166 reviews) | 
| **Task Ranking** | 8.6 (36 reviews) | 8.8 (3289 reviews) | 
| **Kanban Board** | 8.4 (33 reviews) | 8.8 (3081 reviews) | 
| **Custom Workflows** | 8.5 (38 reviews) | 8.7 (3294 reviews) | 
| **Release Forecasting** | 8.3 (37 reviews) | 8.3 (2657 reviews) | 

#### Workflow Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Time Tracking** | 8.5 (35 reviews) | 8.6 (3030 reviews) | 
| **Progress Monitoring** | 8.6 (39 reviews) | 8.9 (3574 reviews) | 
| **Budgeting** | 8.1 (36 reviews) | 7.8 (2261 reviews) | 
| **Team Scorecard** | 8.3 (36 reviews) | 8.4 (2501 reviews) | 

### AI Agents

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | N/A | N/A |
| **Jira** | N/A | N/A |

#### Agentic AI - AI Agents

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multi-step Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Cross-system Integration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Adaptive Learning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Decision Making** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (1):** [Product Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/product-management-software)

**Unique to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (2):** [ALM Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/alm-software), [Requirements Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/requirements-management)

**Unique to Jira (3):** [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/bug-tracking), [Project Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/project-management), [AI Agents For Business Operations](https://www.g2.com/categories/ai-agents-for-business-operations)


---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | Jira | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 13.0% | 23.4% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 27.6% | 43.7% | 
| **Enterprise** | 59.3% | 32.8% | 

### By Industry

#### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- **Information Technology and Services:** 17.9%
- **Automotive:** 13.8%
- **Aviation & Aerospace:** 11.4%
- **Defense & Space:** 10.6%
- **Computer Software:** 4.9%
- **Insurance:** 4.1%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 3.3%
- **Financial Services:** 2.4%
- **Government Administration:** 2.4%
- **Industrial Automation:** 2.4%
- **Other:** 26.8%

#### Jira

- **Computer Software:** 23.6%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 23.6%
- **Financial Services:** 4.8%
- **Marketing and Advertising:** 4.2%
- **Internet:** 4.0%
- **Telecommunications:** 2.3%
- **Retail:** 2.0%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 1.7%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 1.5%
- **Banking:** 1.4%
- **Other:** 30.8%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- [Polarion](https://www.g2.com/products/polarion/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (142 reviews)
- [codebeamer](https://www.g2.com/products/codebeamer/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (141 reviews)
- [Perforce ALM](https://www.g2.com/products/perforce-alm/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (102 reviews)
- [Jama Connect](https://www.g2.com/products/jama-connect/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (199 reviews)
- [ClickUp](https://www.g2.com/products/clickup/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (13162 reviews)
- [Aha!](https://www.g2.com/products/aha/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (365 reviews)
- [Asana](https://www.g2.com/products/asana/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (13793 reviews)
- [Miro](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (13257 reviews)
- [Airtable](https://www.g2.com/products/airtable/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (3282 reviews)
- [Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-microsoft-project-portfolio-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (1627 reviews)

### Alternatives to Jira

- [ClickUp](https://www.g2.com/products/clickup/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (13162 reviews)
- [Asana](https://www.g2.com/products/asana/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (13793 reviews)
- [Teamwork.com](https://www.g2.com/products/teamwork-com/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (1214 reviews)
- [Airtable](https://www.g2.com/products/airtable/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (3282 reviews)
- [Shortcut](https://www.g2.com/products/shortcut/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (177 reviews)
- [Linear](https://www.g2.com/products/linear/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (92 reviews)
- [YouTrack](https://www.g2.com/products/youtrack/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (60 reviews)
- [monday AI Work Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/monday-com/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (16945 reviews)
- [Notion](https://www.g2.com/products/notion/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (12167 reviews)
- [Wrike](https://www.g2.com/products/wrike/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (4537 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- Title: [What is the subscriptions fee for DOORS Next Generation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/subscriptions-fee) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "DOORS Next “Generation” hasn’t existed as a product name for years. Pricing depends on whether Subscription on SaaS or on premise. On premise licenses cover..."
- Title: [Is there a site where I can find more details on DOORS Next Generation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/additional-details) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "The official IBM Requirements Management page that contains the solution brief and other resources can be found here...."

### Jira

- Title: [Is Jira a good tool?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-jira-a-good-tool) — 13 comments, 4 upvotes
  > **Top comment:** "Yes, it is. It's good for having an area to house all tasks required for a scope of work. "
- Title: [How is Jira transforming project management practices in agile software development teams?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/jira-how-is-jira-transforming-project-management-practices-in-agile-software-development-teams) — 11 comments, 8 upvotes
  > **Top comment:** "With jira we were able to streamline team collaboration by showing the actual status of all the team effort in jira timeline while we conduct Scrum..."
- Title: [What are the features of JIRA?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/jira-what-are-the-features-of-jira) — 11 comments, 2 upvotes
  > **Top comment:** "Allows you to setup your project as your team/company flows thru the agile process. You can see what is next in the sprint, where others are, enter your..."
- Title: [Is Jira free tool?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-jira-free-tool) — 8 comments, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "JIRA is free up to 10 users, 2GB of storage. However, they do offer paid plans for more users and storage if need."
- Title: [How is Jira transforming project management practices in agile software development teams?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/how-is-jira-transforming-project-management-practices-in-agile-software-development-teams) — 6 comments, 4 upvotes
  > **Top comment:** "It helps to planning to visualizing progress, managing, backlogs and bug tracking"

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next-vs-jira)