# IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next vs codebeamer Comparison

| | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.0 out of 5 | 4.3 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 136 | 141 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (59.3% of reviews) | Mid-Market (50.7% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | 0.00 USD | No pricing available | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

Pros:
- Data Management (1 reviews)
- Documentation (1 reviews)

Cons:
- Missing Features (1 reviews)
- Process Inefficiency (1 reviews)

### codebeamer

Pros:
- Traceability (2 reviews)
- Cloud Services (1 reviews)

Cons:
- Complexity (2 reviews)
- Complex Configuration (1 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.1 (93 reviews) | 8.4 (98 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 7.4 (95 reviews) | 8.0 (99 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 6.2 (51 reviews) | 7.7 (72 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 6.9 (51 reviews) | 7.9 (67 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 7.7 (87 reviews) | 8.3 (92 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 7.4 (51 reviews) | 8.6 (62 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 8.1 (88 reviews) | 8.5 (91 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Free Trial

Price: 0.00 USD

Key Features:
- 45-day trial with no commitment and no credit card

[Browse all 4 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next/pricing)

#### Free Trial

No

### codebeamer

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### ALM Software

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | N/A | N/A |
| **codebeamer** | N/A | N/A |

#### Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Test Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Traceability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Organization - ALM Software

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Reporting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Requirements Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | 8.9/10 | 25 |
| **codebeamer** | 8.2/10 | 48 |

#### Requirements Authoring and Structure - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Structured Requirements Authoring** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Hierarchical Requirements Organization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Compliance and Governance - Requirement Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Regulated Industry Standards Support** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Administration

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Requirements Listing** | 8.9 (21 reviews) | 8.2 (47 reviews) | 
| **Centralized Information** | 9.3 (22 reviews) | 8.8 (45 reviews) | 
| **Traceability** | 9.2 (22 reviews) | 8.7 (46 reviews) | 

#### Collaboration and Review - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Review and Approval Workflows** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Role-Based Access Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Communication

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Stakeholder Communication** | 8.6 (21 reviews) | 7.9 (44 reviews) | 
| **Internal Communication Enablement** | 8.7 (21 reviews) | 8.5 (42 reviews) | 

#### Role-Based Access Co - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Baselining** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Procedural

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Automated Creation & Testing** | 8.7 (20 reviews) | 7.7 (39 reviews) | 

#### Traceability - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Bidirectional Traceability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Impact Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Traceability Matrix Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### AI Traceability - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Suspect Link Detection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Integration - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **ALM and Project Management Tool Integration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Change Management and Version Control - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Complete Audit Trail** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Product Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | 8.4/10 | 57 |
| **codebeamer** | N/A | N/A |

#### Communication

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Wiki Documentation** | 8.1 (35 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Community Forum** | 8.6 (34 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Customer Ideation** | 8.4 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Planning

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Work Capacity** | 8.6 (37 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Task Ranking** | 8.6 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Kanban Board** | 8.4 (33 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Custom Workflows** | 8.5 (38 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Release Forecasting** | 8.3 (37 reviews) | Not enough data | 

#### Workflow Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Time Tracking** | 8.5 (35 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Progress Monitoring** | 8.6 (39 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Budgeting** | 8.1 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Team Scorecard** | 8.3 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (2):** [ALM Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/alm-software), [Requirements Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/requirements-management)

**Unique to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (1):** [Product Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/product-management-software)



---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 13.0% | 22.1% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 27.6% | 50.7% | 
| **Enterprise** | 59.3% | 27.1% | 

### By Industry

#### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- **Information Technology and Services:** 17.9%
- **Automotive:** 13.8%
- **Aviation & Aerospace:** 11.4%
- **Defense & Space:** 10.6%
- **Computer Software:** 4.9%
- **Insurance:** 4.1%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 3.3%
- **Financial Services:** 2.4%
- **Government Administration:** 2.4%
- **Industrial Automation:** 2.4%
- **Other:** 26.8%

#### codebeamer

- **Automotive:** 30.7%
- **Medical Devices:** 22.9%
- **Computer Software:** 5.7%
- **Aviation & Aerospace:** 4.3%
- **Industrial Automation:** 3.6%
- **Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing:** 2.9%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 2.9%
- **Consulting:** 2.1%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 2.1%
- **Airlines/Aviation:** 1.4%
- **Other:** 21.4%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- [Polarion](https://www.g2.com/products/polarion/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (114 reviews)
- [Perforce ALM](https://www.g2.com/products/perforce-alm/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (102 reviews)
- [Jira](https://www.g2.com/products/jira/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (7842 reviews)
- [Jama Connect](https://www.g2.com/products/jama-connect/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (196 reviews)
- [ClickUp](https://www.g2.com/products/clickup/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (12596 reviews)
- [Aha!](https://www.g2.com/products/aha/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (365 reviews)
- [Asana](https://www.g2.com/products/asana/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (13677 reviews)
- [Miro](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (13144 reviews)
- [Airtable](https://www.g2.com/products/airtable/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (3277 reviews)
- [Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-microsoft-project-portfolio-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (1627 reviews)

### Alternatives to codebeamer

- [Polarion](https://www.g2.com/products/polarion/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (114 reviews)
- [Perforce ALM](https://www.g2.com/products/perforce-alm/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (102 reviews)
- [Jama Connect](https://www.g2.com/products/jama-connect/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (196 reviews)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (133 reviews)
- [IBM Engineering Workflow Management](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-workflow-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (50 reviews)
- [SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/products/spiratest/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (63 reviews)
- [Visure Requirements](https://www.g2.com/products/visure-requirements/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (9 reviews)
- [Arovy](https://www.g2.com/products/arovy/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (90 reviews)
- [reqSuite® rm](https://www.g2.com/products/osseno-software-reqsuite-rm/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (47 reviews)
- [SpiraTeam](https://www.g2.com/products/spirateam/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (32 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- Title: [What is the subscriptions fee for DOORS Next Generation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/subscriptions-fee) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "DOORS Next “Generation” hasn’t existed as a product name for years. Pricing depends on whether Subscription on SaaS or on premise. On premise licenses cover..."
- Title: [Is there a site where I can find more details on DOORS Next Generation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/additional-details) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "The official IBM Requirements Management page that contains the solution brief and other resources can be found here...."

### codebeamer

- Title: [Reference business case for CSV/Medical device?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/reference-business-case-for-csv-medical-device) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Hi Ralf! 

While we do not have a case study on this particular topic, we have many clients in the healthcare/pharmaceutical area and all of them have..."
- Title: [highlighting on same customer requirements](https://www.g2.com/discussions/highlighting-on-same-customer-requirements) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Hello Dhilippan

Thanks for your request.
We have some similar feature requests from our customers. We are working on some AI capabilities and this is one..."

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next-vs-codebeamer)