Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next and codebeamer

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Star Rating
(136)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (59.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
0.00 USD
Browse all 4 pricing plans
codebeamer
codebeamer
Star Rating
(141)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.7% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about codebeamer
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that codebeamer excels in ease of use with a score of 8.0, while IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next lags behind at 7.4. Reviewers mention that codebeamer's intuitive interface simplifies the onboarding process for new users.
  • Reviewers say that codebeamer's centralized information feature scores 8.8, indicating strong performance in managing project data, whereas DOORS Next scores 9.3, highlighting its superior capability in organizing and accessing requirements efficiently.
  • G2 users note that codebeamer's traceability feature, with a score of 8.7, is robust but not as comprehensive as DOORS Next's 9.2 score. Users mention that DOORS Next provides more detailed tracking of requirements changes, which is crucial for compliance in regulated industries.
  • Users on G2 highlight that codebeamer's automated creation and testing feature scores 7.6, which some reviewers find lacking compared to DOORS Next's impressive 8.7. Reviewers mention that DOORS Next's automation capabilities significantly reduce manual effort in testing requirements.
  • Reviewers mention that codebeamer's community forum scores 8.6, indicating a strong user community for support, while DOORS Next's stakeholder communication feature scores 8.6, suggesting that it provides effective channels for engaging with stakeholders.
  • Users say that codebeamer's planning features, such as work capacity and task ranking, score 8.6, which is competitive, but DOORS Next's planning tools are perceived as more advanced, particularly in release forecasting, where it scores 8.3.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Free Trial
0.00
USD
Browse all 4 pricing plans
codebeamer
No pricing available
Free Trial
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
No trial information available
codebeamer
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
93
8.4
98
Ease of Use
7.4
95
8.0
99
Ease of Setup
6.2
51
7.7
72
Ease of Admin
6.9
51
7.9
67
Quality of Support
7.7
87
8.3
92
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.4
51
8.6
62
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
88
8.5
91
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.4
57
Not enough data
Communication
8.1
35
Not enough data
8.6
34
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
Planning
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
8.5
38
Not enough data
8.3
37
Not enough data
Workflow Management
8.5
35
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.1
36
Not enough data
8.3
36
Not enough data
Requirements ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
8.9
25
8.2
47
Administration
8.9
21
8.2
46
9.3
22
8.8
45
9.2
22
8.7
46
Communication
8.6
21
7.8
43
8.7
21
8.5
41
Procedural
8.7
20
7.7
38
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
codebeamer
codebeamer
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next and codebeamer are categorized as ALM Software and Requirements Management
Unique Categories
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next is categorized as Product Management
codebeamer
codebeamer has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
13.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
27.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
59.3%
codebeamer
codebeamer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
22.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
50.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
27.1%
Reviewers' Industry
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Information Technology and Services
17.9%
Automotive
13.8%
Aviation & Aerospace
11.4%
Defense & Space
10.6%
Computer Software
4.9%
Other
41.5%
codebeamer
codebeamer
Automotive
30.7%
Medical Devices
22.9%
Computer Software
5.7%
Aviation & Aerospace
4.3%
Industrial Automation
3.6%
Other
32.9%
Alternatives
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next Alternatives
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Add Perforce ALM
Polarion
Polarion
Add Polarion
Jira
Jira
Add Jira
Jama Connect for Requirements Management
Jama Connect for Requirements Management
Add Jama Connect for Requirements Management
codebeamer
codebeamer Alternatives
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Add Perforce ALM
Polarion
Polarion
Add Polarion
Jama Connect for Requirements Management
Jama Connect for Requirements Management
Add Jama Connect for Requirements Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Add OpenText Application Quality Management
Discussions
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next Discussions
What is the subscriptions fee for DOORS Next Generation?
1 Comment
SH
DOORS Next “Generation” hasn’t existed as a product name for years. Pricing depends on whether Subscription on SaaS or on premise. On premise licenses cover...Read more
Is there a site where I can find more details on DOORS Next Generation?
1 Comment
Official Response from IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
The official IBM Requirements Management page that contains the solution brief and other resources can be found here....Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next has no more discussions with answers
codebeamer
codebeamer Discussions
highlighting on same customer requirements
1 Comment
JD
Hello Dhilippan Thanks for your request. We have some similar feature requests from our customers. We are working on some AI capabilities and this is one...Read more
Reference business case for CSV/Medical device?
1 Comment
Norbert S.
NS
Hi Ralf! While we do not have a case study on this particular topic, we have many clients in the healthcare/pharmaceutical area and all of them have...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
codebeamer has no more discussions with answers