# IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next vs codebeamer Comparison

---
## Frequently Asked Questions

### What is the difference between codebeamer vs IBM Engineering...?

codebeamer stands out for higher reviewer satisfaction in ease of use, setup, and support, while IBM Engineering... is more established in the enterprise segment.

| [codebeamer](https://www.g2.com/products/codebeamer/reviews) | [IBM Engineering...](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.3/5 (141 reviews) | 4.0/5 (136 reviews) |
| Mid-Market | Enterprise |
| 7.7 | 6.2 |
| 8.3 | 7.7 |
| Traceability | Data Management |



### How do the pricing models of codebeamer and IBM Engineering... compare?

codebeamer is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its pricing compared to IBM Engineering....

- **codebeamer:** In recent reviews, many highlight codebeamer as cost-effective and note its value for the features provided.
- **IBM Engineering...:** Reviewers mention IBM Engineering... as being more expensive, with some noting the cost as a drawback, especially for startups and smaller organizations.



### What are the best alternatives to codebeamer and IBM Engineering...?

The best alternatives to codebeamer and IBM Engineering... are Polarion, Perforce ALM, and — (no third alternative supported in the data).

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [codebeamer](https://www.g2.com/products/codebeamer/reviews) | 4.3/5 (141 reviews) | Mid-Market | Cost-effective for features | Traceability |
| [IBM Engineering...](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next/reviews) | 4.0/5 (136 reviews) | Enterprise | Higher cost noted | Data Management |
| [Polarion](https://www.g2.com/products/polarion/reviews) | 4.3/5 (159 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Widely used in enterprise ALM |
| [Perforce ALM](https://www.g2.com/products/perforce-alm/reviews) | 4.1/5 (102 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Strong configuration management |



### Which ALM Software features should I prioritize when comparing codebeamer and IBM Engineering...?

Buyers comparing codebeamer and IBM Engineering... should prioritize Traceability, Ease of Setup, Quality of Support, Customizability, and Integration capabilities.

- **Traceability:** codebeamer (2 all-time mentions), IBM Engineering... (multiple recent reviews highlight traceability as a key benefit)
- **Ease of Setup:** codebeamer (7.7), IBM Engineering... (6.2)
- **Quality of Support:** codebeamer (8.3), IBM Engineering... (7.7)
- **Customizability:** codebeamer (1 all-time mention), IBM Engineering... (recent reviews cite flexibility)
- **Integration capabilities:** codebeamer (Jira integration cited in recent reviews), IBM Engineering... (integration capabilities mentioned in recent reviews)



### What are the pros and cons of codebeamer vs IBM Engineering...?

codebeamer's headline strength is traceability and ease of use, while IBM Engineering... is recognized for robust data management and documentation.

- **codebeamer strengths:** Traceability (2 all-time mentions), abundant features, customizability, integrations, and strong support for requirements management.
- **codebeamer trade-offs:** Complexity (2 all-time mentions), steep learning curve, complex configuration, and interface challenges for new users.
- **IBM Engineering... strengths:** Data management, documentation, flexibility, and strong traceability in regulated environments.
- **IBM Engineering... trade-offs:** Missing features (1 all-time mention), process inefficiency, user difficulty, and higher cost noted in recent reviews.



### Is codebeamer or IBM Engineering... better for small businesses?

codebeamer is a better fit for small businesses, with a larger share of mid-market and positive sentiment from smaller organizations.

- **codebeamer:** Largest segment is Mid-Market, with reviewers noting ease of use and value for smaller teams.
- **IBM Engineering...:** Largest segment is Enterprise, with reviewers citing higher cost and complexity as challenges for smaller organizations.



### Which ALM Software platform has better integrations?

codebeamer is favored for integrations, with reviewers specifically citing its Jira integration.

- **codebeamer:** Jira integration is mentioned in recent reviews, supporting integration with development toolchains.
- **IBM Engineering...:** Integration capabilities are mentioned in recent reviews, but no specific third-party tools are named.



### How do codebeamer and IBM Engineering... compare on customer support?

codebeamer scores higher on Quality of Support by 0.6 points, indicating a material advantage over IBM Engineering....

- **codebeamer:** Reviewers consistently highlight responsive and helpful support, with a Quality of Support score of 8.3.
- **IBM Engineering...:** Reviewers note generally good support, but some mention slower response times and higher complexity, with a Quality of Support score of 7.7.



### Which is easier to implement, codebeamer or IBM Engineering...?

codebeamer is easier to implement, with a 1.5-point higher Ease of Setup score compared to IBM Engineering....

- **codebeamer:** Reviewers describe straightforward setup and implementation, with scores of 7.7 for Ease of Setup and 7.9 for Ease of Admin.
- **IBM Engineering...:** Reviewers mention a steeper learning curve and more complex implementation, with scores of 6.2 for Ease of Setup and 6.9 for Ease of Admin.



### Which product has better Traceability?

codebeamer is rated higher for Traceability, with more frequent and positive reviewer mentions than IBM Engineering....

- **codebeamer:** Traceability is cited in 2 all-time mentions, with reviewers highlighting end-to-end traceability and traceability matrix features.
- **IBM Engineering...:** Traceability is frequently mentioned in recent reviews as a key benefit, especially for regulated environments and complex engineering projects.



| | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.0 out of 5 | 4.3 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 136 | 141 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (59.3% of reviews) | Mid-Market (50.7% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | 0.00 USD | No pricing available | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

Pros:
- Data Management (1 reviews)
- Documentation (1 reviews)

Cons:
- Missing Features (1 reviews)
- Process Inefficiency (1 reviews)

### codebeamer

Pros:
- Traceability (2 reviews)
- Cloud Services (1 reviews)

Cons:
- Complexity (2 reviews)
- Complex Configuration (1 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.1 (93 reviews) | 8.4 (98 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 7.4 (95 reviews) | 8.0 (99 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 6.2 (51 reviews) | 7.7 (72 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 6.9 (51 reviews) | 7.9 (67 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 7.7 (87 reviews) | 8.3 (92 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 7.4 (51 reviews) | 8.6 (62 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 8.1 (88 reviews) | 8.5 (91 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Free Trial

Price: 0.00 USD

Key Features:
- 45-day trial with no commitment and no credit card

[Browse all 4 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next/pricing)

#### Free Trial

No

### codebeamer

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### ALM Software

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | N/A | N/A |
| **codebeamer** | N/A | N/A |

#### Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Testing/QA Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Traceability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Release Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Issue Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Change Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Lifecycle Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Deliverables Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **File Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Knowledge Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Iteration Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Organization - ALM Software

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Reporting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Bug Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Synchronization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Library Maintenance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Agile Methodologies** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Prioritization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Baseline Manager** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Run Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Data** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Conflict Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Case Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **For Developers** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Review** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Code Promotion** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Version Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Status Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Storage** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting & Statistics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Monitoring** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Administrator Level Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Defect Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Automatic Test Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Alerts/Notifications** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Requirements Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | 8.9/10 | 25 |
| **codebeamer** | 8.2/10 | 48 |

#### Requirements Authoring and Structure - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Structured Requirements Authoring** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Hierarchical Requirements Organization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Compliance and Governance - Requirement Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Regulated Industry Standards Support** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Administration

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Requirements Listing** | 8.9 (21 reviews) | 8.2 (47 reviews) | 
| **Centralized Information** | 9.3 (22 reviews) | 8.8 (45 reviews) | 
| **Traceability** | 9.2 (22 reviews) | 8.7 (46 reviews) | 

#### Collaboration and Review - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Review and Approval Workflows** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Role-Based Access Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Communication

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Stakeholder Communication** | 8.6 (21 reviews) | 7.9 (44 reviews) | 
| **Internal Communication Enablement** | 8.7 (21 reviews) | 8.5 (42 reviews) | 

#### Role-Based Access Co - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Baselining** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Procedural

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Automated Creation & Testing** | 8.7 (20 reviews) | 7.7 (39 reviews) | 

#### Traceability - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Bidirectional Traceability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Impact Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Traceability Matrix Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### AI Traceability - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Suspect Link Detection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Integration - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **ALM and Project Management Tool Integration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Change Management and Version Control - Requirements Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Complete Audit Trail** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Document Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Review** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Visualization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **File Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Stakeholder Defined Attributes** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Lifecycle Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Storage** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Communication Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Compliance Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Application Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Data** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Version Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Status Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Commenting/Notes** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Fields** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Progress Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Projections** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Updates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Bug Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Workflow** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Prioritization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **To-Do List** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Templates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Assessment Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Change Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Configurable Workflow** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Agile Methodologies** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Reports** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Budgeting/Forecasting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Template Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **@mentions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Progress Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multiple Projects** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Product Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next** | 8.4/10 | 57 |
| **codebeamer** | N/A | N/A |

#### Communication

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Wiki Documentation** | 8.1 (35 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Community Forum** | 8.6 (34 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Customer Ideation** | 8.4 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **NPS of Customers** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Planning

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Work Capacity** | 8.6 (37 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Task Ranking** | 8.6 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Kanban Board** | 8.4 (33 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Custom Workflows** | 8.5 (38 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Release Forecasting** | 8.3 (37 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Projections** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Prioritization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Workflow Management

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Time Tracking** | 8.5 (35 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Progress Monitoring** | 8.6 (39 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Budgeting** | 8.1 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Team Scorecard** | 8.3 (36 reviews) | Not enough data | 
| **Progress Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Status Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Milestone Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Progress Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Task Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Updates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Product Lifecycle Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Communication Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Notifications** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Resource Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Planning Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Commenting/Notes** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Fields** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Calendar Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Scheduling** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **@mentions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multiple Projects** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting & Statistics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Single Sign On** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Storage** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Release Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customer Journey Mapping** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Gantt/Timeline View** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Email Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **To-Do List** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Surveys & Feedback** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Deadline Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Product Roadmapping** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Idea Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Data** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Agile Methodologies** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Timeline Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **File Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Project Templates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Feedback Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Tagging** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Template Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Guest Access** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Visualization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (2):** [ALM Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/alm-software), [Requirements Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/requirements-management)

**Unique to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (1):** [Product Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/product-management-software)



---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next | codebeamer | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 13.0% | 22.1% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 27.6% | 50.7% | 
| **Enterprise** | 59.3% | 27.1% | 

### By Industry

#### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- **Information Technology and Services:** 17.9%
- **Automotive:** 13.8%
- **Aviation & Aerospace:** 11.4%
- **Defense & Space:** 10.6%
- **Computer Software:** 4.9%
- **Insurance:** 4.1%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 3.3%
- **Financial Services:** 2.4%
- **Government Administration:** 2.4%
- **Industrial Automation:** 2.4%
- **Other:** 26.8%

#### codebeamer

- **Automotive:** 30.7%
- **Medical Devices:** 22.9%
- **Computer Software:** 5.7%
- **Aviation & Aerospace:** 4.3%
- **Industrial Automation:** 3.6%
- **Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing:** 2.9%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 2.9%
- **Consulting:** 2.1%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 2.1%
- **Airlines/Aviation:** 1.4%
- **Other:** 21.4%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- [Polarion](https://www.g2.com/products/polarion/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (161 reviews)
- [Perforce ALM](https://www.g2.com/products/perforce-alm/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (102 reviews)
- [Jira](https://www.g2.com/products/jira/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (7970 reviews)
- [Jama Connect](https://www.g2.com/products/jama-connect/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (225 reviews)
- [ClickUp](https://www.g2.com/products/clickup/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (14275 reviews)
- [Aha!](https://www.g2.com/products/aha/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (367 reviews)
- [Asana](https://www.g2.com/products/asana/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (13965 reviews)
- [Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/products/altium-develop/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (1070 reviews)
- [Miro](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (13569 reviews)
- [Airtable](https://www.g2.com/products/airtable/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (3293 reviews)

### Alternatives to codebeamer

- [Polarion](https://www.g2.com/products/polarion/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (161 reviews)
- [Perforce ALM](https://www.g2.com/products/perforce-alm/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (102 reviews)
- [Jama Connect](https://www.g2.com/products/jama-connect/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (225 reviews)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (133 reviews)
- [Altium Develop](https://www.g2.com/products/altium-develop/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (1070 reviews)
- [IBM Engineering Workflow Management](https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-engineering-workflow-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (50 reviews)
- [Visure Requirements](https://www.g2.com/products/visure-requirements/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (9 reviews)
- [SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/products/spiratest/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (63 reviews)
- [reqSuite® rm](https://www.g2.com/products/osseno-software-reqsuite-rm/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (51 reviews)
- [SpiraTeam](https://www.g2.com/products/spirateam/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (32 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next

- Title: [What is the subscriptions fee for DOORS Next Generation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/subscriptions-fee) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "DOORS Next “Generation” hasn’t existed as a product name for years. Pricing depends on whether Subscription on SaaS or on premise. On premise licenses cover..."
- Title: [Is there a site where I can find more details on DOORS Next Generation?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/additional-details) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "The official IBM Requirements Management page that contains the solution brief and other resources can be found here...."

### codebeamer

- Title: [Reference business case for CSV/Medical device?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/reference-business-case-for-csv-medical-device) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Hi Ralf! 

While we do not have a case study on this particular topic, we have many clients in the healthcare/pharmaceutical area and all of them have..."
- Title: [highlighting on same customer requirements](https://www.g2.com/discussions/highlighting-on-same-customer-requirements) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Hello Dhilippan

Thanks for your request.
We have some similar feature requests from our customers. We are working on some AI capabilities and this is one..."

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/ibm-engineering-requirements-management-doors-next-vs-codebeamer)