Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and Jitterbit 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MindCloud
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1 EDI Source, an Epicor solution
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Star Rating
(49)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Cloud Pak for IntegrationJitterbit
Star Rating
(583)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Jitterbit excels in ease of use with a score of 8.6, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration lags behind at 7.5. Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's intuitive interface makes it easier for teams to adopt and utilize the software effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's quality of support is rated at 9.1, significantly higher than IBM Cloud Pak for Integration's 7.8. Users on G2 appreciate Jitterbit's responsive customer service and comprehensive help guides, which enhance their overall experience.
- G2 users highlight Jitterbit's integration capabilities with a score of 9.2, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration scores 8.6. Users say that Jitterbit's pre-built connectors simplify the integration process, allowing for quicker deployment and less manual configuration.
- Users report that Jitterbit offers superior real-time processing capabilities with a score of 8.1 compared to IBM Cloud Pak for Integration's 7.9. Reviewers mention that this feature is crucial for businesses needing immediate data updates and responsiveness.
- Reviewers mention that Jitterbit shines in data migration with a score of 9.0, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration scores slightly lower at 8.9. Users say that Jitterbit's data migration tools are robust and user-friendly, making transitions smoother.
- Users on G2 report that Jitterbit's application deployment is rated at 9.0, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration also scores well at 9.1. However, reviewers mention that Jitterbit's deployment process is more straightforward, which can save time and reduce complexity for users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
No pricing availableJitterbit
Standard
Contact Us
An entry-level solution for businesses looking to synchronize applications.
Free Trial
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
No trial information availableJitterbit
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
26
8.9
461
Ease of Use
7.4
26
8.6
459
Ease of Setup
6.8
15
8.4
337
Ease of Admin
7.1
14
8.7
333
Quality of Support
7.7
25
9.0
436
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.3
14
9.2
332
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
24
8.7
434
Features by Category
Data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
Analytics
8.3
7
Not enough data
Functionality
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Management
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Message Queue (MQ)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
27
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Development
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
25
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
65
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
64
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.3
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
61
|
Verified
Integrations
Not enough data
8.7
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
42
Security
Not enough data
8.4
54
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
52
|
Verified
Support
Not enough data
8.5
49
|
Verified
Development
7.9
7
8.8
148
Not enough data
8.4
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.4
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
38
Not enough data
8.0
32
Management
7.7
5
|
Verified
7.7
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
37
Security
Not enough data
8.4
34
|
Verified
9.0
5
|
Verified
8.5
36
|
Verified
9.3
5
|
Verified
8.6
34
|
Verified
Integration Options
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
8.4
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
26
|
Verified
Deployment
Not enough data
8.4
31
Not enough data
8.5
31
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.0
23
Not enough data
7.9
25
Application Design
Not enough data
8.0
70
Not enough data
7.8
65
Not enough data
8.5
79
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
74
Data Control
Not enough data
9.0
75
Not enough data
8.8
78
Not enough data
8.9
70
Publishing
Not enough data
8.8
75
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.8
75
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Interface Design
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
52
Data Control
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
9.2
48
Publishing
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
8.9
51
Agentic AI - No-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
7.8
15
8.5
62
8.2
14
8.2
57
7.6
15
8.4
57
7.8
13
8.1
59
API Management
7.7
14
8.1
55
7.6
14
7.9
59
8.2
15
8.2
58
7.3
14
Feature Not Available
7.7
13
7.9
50
Data Integration
8.6
13
8.3
57
9.0
13
8.7
57
7.8
12
7.9
51
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and Jitterbit are categorized as iPaaS and API Management
Unique Categories
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is categorized as Message Queue (MQ), Event Stream Processing, Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), and ETL Tools
Jitterbit is categorized as Low-Code Development Platforms, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), No-Code Development Platforms, Application Development Platforms, and Workplace Innovation Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Jitterbit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.4%
Computer Software
15.8%
Insurance
13.2%
Banking
13.2%
Education Management
10.5%
Other
28.9%
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Financial Services
6.3%
Computer Software
6.3%
Retail
4.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Other
65.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
how much time does it take to become an expert in this technology
1 Comment
DJ
Mostly a month or two if you have knowledge of Rest API, Queues etc. as concept.Read more
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration has no more discussions with answers
What was the key moment that you realised the value of Vinyl?
1 Comment
RL
we were able to create quick websites within couple daysRead more
What is ZUDY vinyl?
1 Comment
MR
Zudy is the name of the company and Vinyl is the Software as a Service (SaaS) product they sell. It's kind of like saying Microsoft Word. Microsoft is a...Read more
Jitterbit has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
