Users report that IBM Cloud Object Storage has a lower ease of use rating (8.0) compared to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage (8.9), indicating that users find Oracle's interface more intuitive and user-friendly.
Reviewers mention that Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage excels in ease of setup (9.0) compared to IBM's rating of 8.1, suggesting that Oracle provides a more streamlined onboarding process for new users.
G2 users highlight that IBM Cloud Object Storage has a lower quality of support rating (8.0) than Oracle's (8.6), which may impact users' ability to resolve issues quickly and effectively.
Users on G2 report that Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage has a perfect product direction score (10.0), while IBM's score of 8.5 indicates that Oracle is perceived as having a clearer and more promising roadmap for future developments.
Reviewers mention that IBM Cloud Object Storage is favored for its versioning capabilities, but Oracle's robust security features, including advanced encryption and access control, are often highlighted as superior by users.
Users say that while both products offer scalability, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage is often praised for its reliability and redundancy features, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-level applications.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Cloud Object Storage
No pricing available
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage
No pricing available
Free Trial
IBM Cloud Object Storage
No trial information available
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Object Storage
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
18
8.6
6
Ease of Use
8.0
18
8.6
6
Ease of Setup
8.1
8
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.5
8
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.0
16
8.9
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.