Users report that IBM Cloud Object Storage has a lower G2 rating of 3.8 compared to StorageGRID's 4.5, indicating that users generally find StorageGRID to be a more reliable and satisfactory option.
Reviewers mention that while both products cater to small businesses, IBM Cloud Object Storage has a slightly smaller market segment representation at 42.3%, whereas StorageGRID has a stronger presence at 50%, suggesting a more robust user base for StorageGRID.
G2 users highlight that IBM Cloud Object Storage scores 8.0 in ease of use, while StorageGRID scores higher at 8.3, indicating that users find StorageGRID to be more user-friendly and easier to navigate.
Users on G2 report that the quality of support for StorageGRID is rated at 8.9, significantly higher than IBM Cloud Object Storage's 8.0, suggesting that users may receive more effective assistance with StorageGRID.
Reviewers mention that IBM Cloud Object Storage has a lower score in product direction at 8.5 compared to StorageGRID's 9.2, indicating that users feel more confident in the future development and enhancements of StorageGRID.
Users say that StorageGRID offers better scalability and redundancy features, which are crucial for businesses looking to grow and ensure data availability, while IBM Cloud Object Storage may not meet the same level of expectations in these areas.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Cloud Object Storage
No pricing available
NetApp StorageGRID
No pricing available
Free Trial
IBM Cloud Object Storage
No trial information available
NetApp StorageGRID
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
18
9.2
12
Ease of Use
8.0
18
8.3
13
Ease of Setup
8.1
8
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.5
8
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.0
16
8.8
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.