Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare HttpWatch and Xcode 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (72.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
HttpWatch
Star Rating
(13)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HttpWatchXcode
Star Rating
(1,005)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about XcodeSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Xcode excels in its "Emulation" capabilities, scoring a notable 9.0, which allows developers to test their applications in a simulated environment effectively. In contrast, HttpWatch, while strong in "Test Feedback" with a score of 8.9, does not offer the same level of emulation features, which can limit testing scenarios for developers.
- Reviewers mention that Xcode's "File Management" feature is rated at 8.8, providing a robust system for organizing project files and resources. HttpWatch, however, has a slightly lower score of 8.6 in this area, indicating that while it is functional, it may not be as intuitive or comprehensive for file handling.
- G2 users highlight that HttpWatch shines in "Quality of Support," achieving a score of 9.4, which suggests that users find the support team responsive and helpful. Conversely, Xcode's support quality is rated at 7.7, indicating that users may experience longer wait times or less effective assistance when encountering issues.
- Users on G2 report that Xcode's "Customization" options are rated at 8.5, allowing developers to tailor their development environment to their specific needs. HttpWatch, with a lower score of 8.3, may not offer the same level of flexibility, which could be a drawback for users seeking a highly personalized experience.
- Reviewers say that Xcode's "Straight-Out-the-Box Functionality" is rated at 8.8, meaning that users can start developing applications immediately without extensive setup. HttpWatch, while also rated at 8.8 in this area, may require additional configuration for optimal use, which could be a consideration for new users.
- Users report that Xcode's "Help Guides" are rated at 8.6, providing valuable resources for troubleshooting and learning. In comparison, HttpWatch's help guides score slightly lower at 8.4, suggesting that while they are helpful, they may not be as comprehensive or user-friendly as those offered by Xcode.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
HttpWatch
No pricing availableXcode
No pricing availableFree Trial
HttpWatch
No trial information availableXcode
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.4
6
8.8
822
Ease of Use
8.6
6
7.8
825
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.0
174
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.0
135
Quality of Support
9.4
6
7.7
728
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.1
125
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
6
7.9
799
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
65
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.7
57
Not enough data
8.5
63
Not enough data
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.6
61
Not enough data
8.6
61
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Incident Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
89
Not enough data
8.5
89
Not enough data
9.0
96
Management
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
8.6
85
Not enough data
8.8
85
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.7
63
Not enough data
8.2
60
Not enough data
8.3
64
Not enough data
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.4
64
Not enough data
8.9
64
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
8.6
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
HttpWatch and Xcode are categorized as Mobile App Debugging
Unique Categories
HttpWatch is categorized as Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
HttpWatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Xcode
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Automotive
18.2%
Retail
9.1%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Computer Software
35.9%
Information Technology and Services
18.1%
Internet
5.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
2.2%
Other
34.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
HttpWatch has no discussions with answers
Can we use Xcode for the hybrid apps in future?
2 Comments
KS
It's doubtful - Apple likes to keep their environment separate from others. iOS will continue to be its own identity and I doubt hybrid apps will be...Read more
Is Xcode good for Python?
2 Comments
YB
no its only for swift there was objective -C also but prefer to go with swift.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
