Users report that Play excels in ease of setup with a score of 8.3, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for quick deployment, while Hibernate's setup process is less emphasized, indicating potential challenges for users.
Reviewers mention that Hibernate offers superior quality of support with a score of 8.1, which is crucial for businesses that require reliable assistance, whereas Play's support quality is rated lower at 7.4, suggesting that users may face difficulties in resolving issues.
G2 users highlight that Play has a slightly lower score of 7.8 in meeting requirements compared to Hibernate's 8.7, indicating that Hibernate may better align with user needs and expectations, particularly for more complex applications.
Users on G2 note that while Play has a star rating of 4.1, Hibernate's 4.2 rating reflects a more favorable overall user satisfaction, suggesting that Hibernate may provide a more polished experience.
Reviewers say that Play is particularly favored by small businesses, with 53.8% of reviews coming from this segment, while Hibernate also serves small businesses but with a lower percentage of 40.0%, indicating Play's stronger market presence in this area.
Users report that both products have room for improvement in ease of administration, with Play scoring 6.7 and Hibernate not providing a score, which may suggest that users find Play's administrative tasks more cumbersome than expected.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Hibernate
No pricing available
Play
No pricing available
Free Trial
Hibernate
No trial information available
Play
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
20
7.8
13
Ease of Use
8.0
20
7.4
13
Ease of Setup
8.0
5
8.3
6
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
6.7
6
Quality of Support
8.1
18
7.4
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.