Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Hibernate and Play

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Hibernate
Hibernate
Star Rating
(28)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Hibernate
Play
Play
Star Rating
(13)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Play
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Play excels in ease of setup with a score of 8.3, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for quick deployment, while Hibernate's setup process is less emphasized, indicating potential challenges for users.
  • Reviewers mention that Hibernate offers superior quality of support with a score of 8.1, which is crucial for businesses that require reliable assistance, whereas Play's support quality is rated lower at 7.4, suggesting that users may face difficulties in resolving issues.
  • G2 users highlight that Play has a slightly lower score of 7.8 in meeting requirements compared to Hibernate's 8.7, indicating that Hibernate may better align with user needs and expectations, particularly for more complex applications.
  • Users on G2 note that while Play has a star rating of 4.1, Hibernate's 4.2 rating reflects a more favorable overall user satisfaction, suggesting that Hibernate may provide a more polished experience.
  • Reviewers say that Play is particularly favored by small businesses, with 53.8% of reviews coming from this segment, while Hibernate also serves small businesses but with a lower percentage of 40.0%, indicating Play's stronger market presence in this area.
  • Users report that both products have room for improvement in ease of administration, with Play scoring 6.7 and Hibernate not providing a score, which may suggest that users find Play's administrative tasks more cumbersome than expected.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Hibernate
No pricing available
Play
No pricing available
Free Trial
Hibernate
No trial information available
Play
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
20
7.8
13
Ease of Use
8.0
20
7.4
13
Ease of Setup
8.0
5
8.3
6
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
6.7
6
Quality of Support
8.1
18
7.4
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.0
5
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
20
7.3
13
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Hibernate
Hibernate
Play
Play
Hibernate and Play are categorized as Java Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Hibernate
Hibernate has no unique categories
Play
Play has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Hibernate
Hibernate
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
40.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
36.0%
Play
Play
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
53.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
15.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
30.8%
Reviewers' Industry
Hibernate
Hibernate
Information Technology and Services
32.0%
Computer Software
20.0%
Telecommunications
8.0%
Higher Education
8.0%
Retail
4.0%
Other
28.0%
Play
Play
Internet
38.5%
Program Development
15.4%
Computer Software
15.4%
Think Tanks
7.7%
Newspapers
7.7%
Other
15.4%
Alternatives
Hibernate
Hibernate Alternatives
spring.io
spring.io
Add spring.io
Apache OFBiz
Apache OFBiz
Add Apache OFBiz
Jmix
Jmix
Add Jmix
JHipster
JHipster
Add JHipster
Play
Play Alternatives
spring.io
spring.io
Add spring.io
Grails
Grails
Add Grails
Vaadin
Vaadin
Add Vaadin
Eclipse Jetty
Eclipse Jetty
Add Eclipse Jetty
Discussions
Hibernate
Hibernate Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Hibernate has no discussions with answers
Play
Play Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Play has no discussions with answers