Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Heroku Redis and ScyllaDB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (81.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (40.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Heroku Redis
Star Rating
(11)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (81.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Heroku RedisScyllaDB
Star Rating
(357)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ScyllaDB excels in scalability with a score of 9.2, allowing for seamless handling of large datasets, while Heroku Redis shines in integrated caching with a perfect score of 10.0, making it ideal for applications requiring fast data retrieval.
- Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's data replication feature scores 8.1, which is lower than Heroku Redis's impressive 9.3, indicating that users find Heroku Redis more reliable for maintaining data consistency across distributed systems.
- G2 users highlight that ScyllaDB's data model received a score of 8.1, which some users feel could be improved, whereas Heroku Redis's data types score a perfect 10.0, showcasing its versatility in handling various data formats.
- Users on G2 report that ScyllaDB's quality of support is rated at 8.3, which is lower than Heroku Redis's 9.2, suggesting that users may find more responsive and helpful support with Heroku Redis.
- Reviewers say that ScyllaDB's application performance is rated at 9.0, indicating strong performance metrics, but Heroku Redis's overall performance features, including security and stability, score higher, with ratings around 9.7, making it a more robust choice for critical applications.
- Users mention that while ScyllaDB offers decent database monitoring with a score of 8.8, Heroku Redis's features for auditing and encryption are rated at 10.0, highlighting its superior security measures that are crucial for sensitive data management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Heroku Redis
No pricing availableScyllaDB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Heroku Redis
No trial information availableScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
7
8.8
300
Ease of Use
9.0
7
8.6
309
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.3
218
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.2
115
Quality of Support
8.8
7
8.5
280
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.7
95
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
7
9.2
292
Features by Category
Data Management
9.4
6
8.6
143
10.0
5
8.6
148
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.5
141
9.3
5
8.6
141
Performance
10.0
5
8.7
139
Security
Not enough data
8.3
133
9.7
5
8.5
134
10.0
5
8.4
131
10.0
5
8.5
130
Support
Not enough data
8.5
128
9.0
5
8.4
135
Storage
Not enough data
8.4
66
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
71
Not enough data
8.6
68
Security
Not enough data
8.1
63
Support
Not enough data
8.5
70
Not enough data
8.4
69
Not enough data
8.2
65
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.0
5
Configuration
Not enough data
9.2
146
Not enough data
8.8
139
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
8.7
135
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.7
131
Availability
Not enough data
9.4
144
Not enough data
8.9
141
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
8.8
140
Security
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
8.7
123
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
132
Not enough data
8.7
126
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Heroku Redis and ScyllaDB are categorized as Key Value Databases
Unique Categories
Heroku Redis has no unique categories
ScyllaDB is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS) and Wide Column Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Heroku Redis
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
27.3%
Education Management
18.2%
Computer Software
18.2%
Management Consulting
9.1%
Human Resources
9.1%
Other
18.2%
Computer Software
29.3%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Financial Services
5.8%
Education Management
3.5%
Banking
3.5%
Other
45.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Heroku Redis has no discussions with answers
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
