Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare HCSS and Oracle Aconex 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent Lucernex
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
InEight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
InSite Elevation
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (58.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (55.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
HCSS
Star Rating
(233)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (58.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HCSSOracle Aconex
Star Rating
(229)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Oracle Aconex excels in document management with features like centralized platform and versioning, scoring 8.4 and 8.2 respectively, while HCSS falls slightly behind with scores of 7.6 for document management. Reviewers mention that Aconex's document management capabilities streamline collaboration across teams effectively.
- Reviewers mention that HCSS shines in quality of support, achieving a score of 9.6 compared to Oracle Aconex's 8.8. Users on G2 highlight that HCSS provides timely and effective assistance, making it a reliable partner for businesses.
- Users say that Oracle Aconex offers superior field communication features, scoring 9.0, while HCSS lags with a score of 7.9. Reviewers mention that Aconex's tools facilitate real-time updates and collaboration, enhancing project efficiency.
- G2 users report that HCSS has a better ease of use rating at 8.4 compared to Oracle Aconex's 8.8. However, users mention that Aconex's setup process is smoother, scoring 8.9, which is beneficial for teams looking to implement the software quickly.
- Reviewers mention that Oracle Aconex's project tracking capabilities are highly rated at 9.0, while HCSS scores 7.8. Users report that Aconex's project tracking tools provide comprehensive insights, helping teams stay on schedule and within budget.
- Users on G2 highlight that HCSS's safety compliance features are rated lower at 7.4 compared to Oracle Aconex's 8.8. Reviewers say that Aconex's safety management tools are robust, ensuring that compliance is maintained throughout the project lifecycle.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
HCSS
No pricing availableOracle Aconex
No pricing availableFree Trial
HCSS
Free Trial is available
Oracle Aconex
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
211
8.9
139
Ease of Use
8.5
222
8.8
141
Ease of Setup
8.1
155
8.9
49
Ease of Admin
8.4
84
8.8
49
Quality of Support
9.6
204
8.8
129
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
85
8.5
51
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
220
8.8
121
Features by Category
Vehicle Management
7.3
48
Not enough data
6.2
46
Not enough data
8.0
47
Not enough data
7.1
44
Not enough data
ELD Compliance
7.3
40
Not enough data
7.7
40
Not enough data
5.9
37
Not enough data
6.1
37
Not enough data
Driver Management
6.2
44
Not enough data
7.5
47
Not enough data
5.8
43
Not enough data
5.7
43
Not enough data
Deliveries
5.2
43
Not enough data
5.2
43
Not enough data
5.4
43
Not enough data
Dashcam
5.0
36
Not enough data
5.9
37
Not enough data
5.8
36
Not enough data
Analytics
5.8
44
Not enough data
5.3
42
Not enough data
6.7
45
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Fleet Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Fleet Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Document Management
7.5
59
Not enough data
8.1
58
Not enough data
8.2
57
Not enough data
7.0
58
Not enough data
Qualifications
7.4
56
Not enough data
7.2
56
Not enough data
7.3
54
Not enough data
Construction Management
8.1
53
Not enough data
8.4
54
Not enough data
8.5
54
Not enough data
Cost Tracking
Not enough data
8.4
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.3
23
Planning
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Management
Not enough data
8.9
36
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
9.6
38
Field Management
8.6
85
8.7
40
8.2
84
Feature Not Available
7.7
82
8.8
36
8.0
80
9.0
38
7.5
78
Feature Not Available
Asset Management
7.9
78
Feature Not Available
9.2
81
Feature Not Available
8.2
78
9.0
39
8.6
80
9.0
40
Workplace Safety Management
8.6
13
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
Operational Safety Management
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.9
12
Not enough data
6.8
11
Not enough data
6.9
12
Not enough data
Logistical Safety Management
8.3
13
Not enough data
7.0
11
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
Task Management
8.3
30
8.3
53
Feature Not Available
8.3
53
8.2
30
8.8
61
8.2
29
9.0
75
8.3
28
9.4
80
8.2
29
9.2
81
Site Management
7.9
28
Feature Not Available
8.7
29
9.0
77
8.4
30
8.2
66
8.9
30
9.0
74
8.9
30
Feature Not Available
9.0
29
8.9
74
8.1
28
Feature Not Available
Workflow Management
8.0
103
Not enough data
8.0
104
Not enough data
Job Costing
8.4
106
Not enough data
7.9
100
Not enough data
8.0
100
Not enough data
Document Management
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.5
22
Not enough data
7.8
23
Not enough data
7.1
22
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
Site Management
8.1
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
HCSS and Oracle Aconex are categorized as Jobsite Management and Construction Project Management
Unique Categories
HCSS is categorized as Construction Drawing Management, Bid Management, Construction Estimating, Fleet Management, and Construction Risk Assessment Software
Oracle Aconex is categorized as Capital Project Management and Project Cost Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
HCSS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Oracle Aconex
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Construction
84.1%
Civil Engineering
5.6%
Utilities
1.7%
Consulting
1.3%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
0.9%
Other
6.5%
Construction
62.4%
Civil Engineering
6.1%
Architecture & Planning
4.6%
Management Consulting
4.1%
Oil & Energy
3.6%
Other
19.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is HCSS Plans used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from HCSS
Designed specifically for the heavy civil construction industry, HCSS Plans is a digital plans management tool that allows your foremen to take control of...Read more
What is Equipment360 used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from HCSS
Equipment360 enables fleet management to automate preventative maintenance schedules, track repair history, and provide cost analysis, ensuring your...Read more
What is HCSS Dispatcher used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from HCSS
HCSS Dispatcher improves your scheduling and dispatching efficiency by avoiding downtime and delays, reducing unnecessary rentals, and automating routine...Read more
Is it possible to reduce the total cost and training charges of this product?
1 Comment
BU
if Yes, Small Project may use AconexRead more
What is the best way to upload multiple files with separate descriptions and disciplines
1 Comment
LV
If we can upload multiple files but its hard to write descriptions 1 by 1.
Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
