Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare HCL Workload Automation and JAMS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RunMyJobs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Go1
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Astro by Astronomer
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$9,996.00 Per Year
HCL Workload Automation
Star Rating
(11)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HCL Workload AutomationJAMS
Star Rating
(218)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$9,996.00 Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that JAMS Enterprise Job Scheduler excels in Quality of Support with a score of 9.5, while HCL Workload Automation falls short with a score of 7.7, indicating that JAMS provides more responsive and helpful customer service.
- Reviewers mention that JAMS offers superior Job Scheduling capabilities, scoring 9.4, which users appreciate for its flexibility and ease of use, whereas HCL's scheduling features are rated lower, suggesting a less intuitive experience.
- G2 users highlight JAMS' strong Proactive Workflow features, scoring 9.0, which allow for better management of tasks and alerts, while HCL's score in this area is not as high, indicating potential gaps in proactive management.
- Users on G2 note that JAMS has a more user-friendly Ease of Setup with a score of 8.7, making it easier for teams to implement, compared to HCL, which lacks detailed ratings in this category, suggesting a more complex setup process.
- Reviewers say that JAMS shines in Automation with a score of 9.0, particularly in workload processing, while HCL's automation features are perceived as less robust, leading to potential inefficiencies in task management.
- Users report that JAMS provides better Service Management capabilities, scoring 9.0, which enhances operational efficiency, while HCL's lower score indicates that users may face challenges in managing services effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
HCL Workload Automation
No pricing availableJAMS
Core
$9,996.00
Per Year
Perfect for small teams getting started with automation.
Core Integrations: PowerShell, SQL, Azure Data Factory, Python, & 20+ others.
- Full IT and data orchestration
- Cross-platform job scheduling
- Advanced workflow automation
Free Trial
HCL Workload Automation
No trial information availableJAMS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.0
5
9.0
170
Ease of Use
9.0
5
8.6
172
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.5
137
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.6
109
Quality of Support
7.7
5
9.3
165
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.2
108
Product Direction (% positive)
Not enough data
9.2
165
Features by Category
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
149
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Administration
Not enough data
8.5
144
Not enough data
8.5
131
Not enough data
8.4
117
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
79
Not enough data
8.9
74
Functionality
Not enough data
9.3
140
Not enough data
8.4
111
Not enough data
8.1
73
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
6.4
15
Not enough data
6.8
16
Not enough data
6.7
15
Not enough data
6.8
15
Not enough data
6.4
15
Not enough data
6.3
14
Not enough data
6.9
14
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
HCL Workload Automation and JAMS are categorized as Workload Automation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
HCL Workload Automation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
JAMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
18.2%
Warehousing
9.1%
Utilities
9.1%
Investment Banking
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Other
45.5%
Financial Services
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.9%
Insurance
7.0%
Banking
4.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
59.5%
Discussions
HCL Workload Automation has no discussions with answers
How to hold schedules of all the jobs ?
2 Comments
AC
JAMS has the option to use jobs to execute other jobs in a specific order, which allows you to hold schedules for all jobs.Read more
Can JAMS convert my existing batch jobs?
2 Comments
Official Response from JAMS
Yes. Conversion utilities for Windows Task Scheduler, SQL Server Agent, and Cron are included with JAMS.Read more
What is a JAMS Job?
2 Comments
RG
A JAMS job is a definition for a task to be performed. It can be triggered by the appearance of a file at a certain location, an email receipt, a date/time...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
