Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare HCL AppScan and SOOS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free
HCL AppScan
Star Rating
(76)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansSOOS
Star Rating
(42)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that HCL AppScan excels in its Language Support with a rating of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for teams working with diverse programming languages. In contrast, SOOS also offers strong language support but does not match the same level of versatility.
- Reviewers mention that SOOS shines in Static Code Analysis with a rating of 9.0, which is higher than HCL AppScan's 8.2. This indicates that SOOS may provide more thorough insights into code vulnerabilities, which is crucial for developers focused on security.
- G2 users highlight that SOOS has a superior Ease of Use rating of 9.3 compared to HCL AppScan's 8.5. This suggests that SOOS may offer a more intuitive interface, making it easier for teams to adopt and integrate into their workflows.
- Users on G2 report that HCL AppScan's Remediation Suggestions feature, rated at 9.0, is particularly helpful for teams looking to quickly address vulnerabilities. However, SOOS also provides valuable remediation insights, albeit with a slightly lower effectiveness.
- Reviewers mention that SOOS has a better False Positives rate, scoring 6.1 compared to HCL AppScan's 7.5. This indicates that SOOS may provide more accurate vulnerability assessments, reducing the noise for security teams.
- Users say that HCL AppScan's Product Direction rating of 8.4 reflects a commitment to continuous improvement, but SOOS outshines with a score of 9.6, indicating a more positive outlook on future developments and enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
HCL AppScan
HCL AppScan CodeSweep
Free
Free-to-use security tool for developers alike who need to "spell check" and fix their code, as they write it, in multiple IDEs.
- Ideal for Developers
SOOS
SOOS Community Edition
Free
Our no-hassle enrollment process and easy-to-setup GitHub integration, brings practical supply chain security to the masses. Use our SCA tool with any public GitHub repository!
- All features of SOOS SCA
- Scan Node, Ruby, Python, Java, & more (17 pkg managers and languages)
- Robust license policies
Free Trial
HCL AppScan
Free Trial is available
SOOS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
59
8.8
29
Ease of Use
8.5
62
9.3
32
Ease of Setup
8.5
31
9.1
19
Ease of Admin
8.7
31
9.3
18
Quality of Support
8.5
60
9.3
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
30
9.1
17
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
58
9.6
30
Features by Category
Administration
8.2
21
Not enough data
8.5
21
Not enough data
Analysis
8.6
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.0
22
Not enough data
Testing
7.6
21
Not enough data
7.8
21
Not enough data
8.4
20
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.1
26
7.4
9
8.2
28
8.3
7
Analysis
8.5
29
7.6
12
8.0
27
8.6
11
8.2
28
9.0
8
8.5
27
9.0
13
8.3
27
Not enough data
Testing
7.7
28
Feature Not Available
7.9
24
9.4
8
8.4
26
8.9
6
8.2
29
9.3
9
8.2
29
8.9
11
7.1
29
6.1
9
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
9.5
17
Not enough data
9.4
14
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
9.3
15
Not enough data
9.1
15
API Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
HCL AppScan and SOOS are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and Software Composition Analysis
Unique Categories
HCL AppScan is categorized as Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
SOOS is categorized as API Security, Container Security, Software Supply Chain Security Tools, and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
HCL AppScan
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SOOS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
24.3%
Computer & Network Security
13.5%
Computer Software
9.5%
Automotive
8.1%
Banking
6.8%
Other
37.8%
Information Technology and Services
27.5%
Computer Software
20.0%
Real Estate
5.0%
Pharmaceuticals
5.0%
Logistics and Supply Chain
5.0%
Other
37.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Who owns AppScan?
1 Comment
Official Response from HCL AppScan
HCL AppScan is owned by HCL Software.Read more
HCL AppScan has no more discussions with answers
SOOS has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
