Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Hazelcast Platform and Memcached 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (68.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Hazelcast Platform
Star Rating
(13)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Hazelcast PlatformMemcached
Star Rating
(17)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MemcachedSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Memcached excels in ease of use with a score of 9.4, while Hazelcast Platform lags behind at 8.5. Reviewers mention that Memcached's straightforward setup and management make it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for quick deployment.
- Reviewers say that Memcached has a higher G2 rating of 4.7 compared to Hazelcast Platform's 4.3, indicating a stronger overall user satisfaction. Users on G2 appreciate Memcached's simplicity and performance in caching, which is crucial for applications requiring fast data retrieval.
- G2 users highlight that Hazelcast Platform offers robust real-time processing capabilities, scoring higher in product direction at 7.4 compared to Memcached's 6.7. Users mention that this makes Hazelcast a better fit for applications needing real-time analytics and data distribution.
- Users say that both platforms have similar quality of support, each scoring 8.7, but reviewers mention that Hazelcast Platform provides more comprehensive documentation and resources for troubleshooting, which can be beneficial for teams needing extensive support.
- Reviewers mention that Memcached shines in its storage capabilities with a score of 9.2, while Hazelcast Platform's storage features are rated lower. Users report that Memcached's efficient memory management is particularly advantageous for applications with high caching demands.
- Users on G2 report that Hazelcast Platform's scalability is impressive, with a score of 9.5, making it suitable for larger enterprises. In contrast, Memcached, while effective, may not scale as seamlessly for extensive data needs, as noted by some reviewers.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Hazelcast Platform
No pricing availableMemcached
No pricing availableFree Trial
Hazelcast Platform
Free Trial is available
Memcached
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
8
9.5
14
Ease of Use
8.5
9
9.4
14
Ease of Setup
8.0
5
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.0
5
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
5
8.7
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
9
6.7
14
Features by Category
Data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Solution Provision
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Indexing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Filters
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Hazelcast Platform and Memcached are categorized as Key Value Databases
Unique Categories
Hazelcast Platform is categorized as Event Stream Processing, Data Replication, Stream Analytics, Big Data Processing and Distribution, Document Databases, Real-time Analytic Database, Time Series Databases, and Vector Database
Memcached has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Hazelcast Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Memcached
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Telecommunications
8.3%
Retail
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Computer Software
31.3%
Internet
25.0%
Marketing and Advertising
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Real Estate
6.3%
Other
12.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Hazelcast Platform has no discussions with answers
Memcached has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
