Users report that HAProxy excels in performance and reliability, achieving a score of 9.6, which reviewers attribute to its efficient handling of high traffic loads and low latency. In contrast, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Load Balancing, while still strong, has a slightly lower performance rating.
Reviewers mention that HAProxy's API and integrations score of 9.2 is a standout feature, allowing for seamless connectivity with various applications. Users on G2 highlight the ease of integrating HAProxy with existing systems, whereas Oracle's API management features, while solid, do not receive the same level of praise.
G2 users indicate that HAProxy's logging and reporting capabilities, rated at 8.7, provide detailed insights into traffic patterns and performance metrics. In comparison, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Load Balancing's logging features are perceived as less comprehensive, with a score of 8.2, leading to some user frustration regarding visibility into system operations.
Users say that HAProxy's scalability, rated at 9.2, allows businesses to grow without worrying about performance bottlenecks. Reviewers mention that Oracle's scalability is good but not as robust, particularly in rapidly changing environments.
Reviewers mention that HAProxy's quality of support, rated at 9.0, is a significant advantage, with many users praising the responsiveness and expertise of the support team. Conversely, Oracle's support, while adequate, scores lower at 8.2, leading some users to seek additional resources.
Users report that HAProxy's application-layer controls, rated at 9.0, provide granular control over traffic management, which is particularly beneficial for complex applications. Oracle's traffic control features, while effective, do not offer the same level of customization, leading to a score of 9.1.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.