Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare HAProxy and Jitterbit 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1 EDI Source, an Epicor solution
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MindCloud
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
FREE Open Source
Contact Us
HAProxy
Star Rating
(681)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
FREE Open Source
Browse all 2 pricing plansJitterbit
Star Rating
(583)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Jitterbit excels in its user-friendly interface, making it easier for mid-market companies to integrate applications quickly, while HAProxy is noted for its robust traffic control features, which reviewers say are essential for managing high volumes of requests efficiently.
- Reviewers mention that both Jitterbit and HAProxy offer excellent support, with a quality of support score of 9.0 for both. However, users on G2 highlight that Jitterbit has been a better partner in business, scoring 9.2 in that area, indicating a more collaborative relationship with its users.
- Users say that Jitterbit's API monitoring capabilities are solid, scoring 8.2, but HAProxy outshines it with a score of 8.7, as reviewers mention that HAProxy provides more comprehensive insights into API performance and issues.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have similar ease of use scores (8.6), Jitterbit's ease of setup is slightly lower at 8.4 compared to HAProxy's 8.5, indicating that users find HAProxy a bit easier to get started with.
- Users on G2 report that Jitterbit's documentation and logs score lower at 7.9, with some reviewers expressing frustration over the lack of detailed guides, whereas HAProxy's documentation is praised for being more thorough, scoring 8.8.
- Reviewers mention that Jitterbit's plugin capabilities score 7.9, which some users find limiting, while HAProxy's plugins score 8.4, indicating a wider range of integrations that enhance its functionality for users looking for customization.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jitterbit
Standard
Contact Us
An entry-level solution for businesses looking to synchronize applications.
Free Trial
HAProxy
Free Trial is available
Jitterbit
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
465
8.9
461
Ease of Use
8.6
616
8.6
459
Ease of Setup
8.6
572
8.4
337
Ease of Admin
8.6
349
8.7
333
Quality of Support
9.1
352
9.0
436
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
272
9.2
332
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
482
8.7
434
Features by Category
Analysis
8.4
76
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Controls
8.9
67
Not enough data
9.0
75
Not enough data
8.9
72
Not enough data
Functionality
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
70
Not enough data
7.8
32
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
58
Not enough data
8.4
54
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.2
58
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Resolution
8.9
58
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
57
Not enough data
7.6
39
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
9.2
26
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
27
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Development
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
25
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
65
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
64
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.3
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
61
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
61
|
Verified
Integrations
Not enough data
8.7
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
42
Security
Not enough data
8.4
54
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
52
|
Verified
Support
Not enough data
8.5
49
|
Verified
Development
Not enough data
8.8
148
Not enough data
8.4
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.4
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
38
Not enough data
8.0
32
Management
Not enough data
7.7
40
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
37
Security
Not enough data
8.4
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
34
|
Verified
Integration Options
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
8.4
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
28
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
26
|
Verified
Deployment
Not enough data
8.4
31
Not enough data
8.5
31
Functionality
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.8
25
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
8.7
28
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.0
23
Not enough data
7.9
25
Usability - Load Balancing
8.3
112
Not enough data
8.3
113
Not enough data
8.4
110
Not enough data
8.4
106
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
8.8
108
Not enough data
8.4
106
Not enough data
8.6
108
Not enough data
8.5
105
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
9.1
108
Not enough data
8.2
105
Not enough data
8.2
102
Not enough data
8.4
105
Not enough data
8.8
105
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
8.0
70
Not enough data
7.8
65
Not enough data
8.5
79
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
74
Data Control
Not enough data
9.0
75
Not enough data
8.8
78
Not enough data
8.9
70
Publishing
Not enough data
8.8
75
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.8
75
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Interface Design
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
56
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
52
Data Control
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
9.2
48
Publishing
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
8.9
51
Agentic AI - No-Code Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Feature Not Available
8.5
62
Feature Not Available
8.2
57
Feature Not Available
8.4
57
Feature Not Available
8.1
59
API Management
9.1
83
8.1
55
8.8
85
7.9
59
8.7
77
8.2
58
7.9
71
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
7.9
50
Data Integration
Feature Not Available
8.3
57
Feature Not Available
8.7
57
8.4
75
7.9
51
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
HAProxy and Jitterbit are categorized as API Management
Unique Categories
HAProxy is categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF), DDoS Protection, Load Balancing, Container Networking, and Bot Detection and Mitigation
Jitterbit is categorized as iPaaS, Low-Code Development Platforms, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), No-Code Development Platforms, Application Development Platforms, and Workplace Innovation Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
HAProxy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Jitterbit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
12.4%
Computer Software
11.1%
Financial Services
10.7%
Computer & Network Security
6.1%
Telecommunications
5.0%
Other
54.7%
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Financial Services
6.3%
Computer Software
6.3%
Retail
4.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Other
65.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is HAProxy an API gateway?
2 Comments
JL
Yes it can beRead more
Is HAProxy a reverse proxy?
2 Comments
EV
Yes, it's a reverse proxy. Actually it's one of the best reverse proxies out there.Read more
What was the key moment that you realised the value of Vinyl?
1 Comment
RL
we were able to create quick websites within couple daysRead more
What is ZUDY vinyl?
1 Comment
MR
Zudy is the name of the company and Vinyl is the Software as a Service (SaaS) product they sell. It's kind of like saying Microsoft Word. Microsoft is a...Read more
Jitterbit has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
