Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Hadoop HDFS and Hazelcast Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
High Digital
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ILUM
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Hadoop HDFS
Star Rating
(141)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Hadoop HDFSHazelcast Platform
Star Rating
(13)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Hazelcast PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Hadoop HDFS excels in data distribution with a score of 9.1, making it a strong choice for large-scale data storage and processing, while reviewers mention that Hazelcast Platform, although effective, scores slightly lower in this area, indicating it may not handle massive data sets as efficiently.
- Reviewers mention that Hazelcast Platform offers superior ease of use with a score of 8.5 compared to Hadoop HDFS's 7.5, suggesting that users find Hazelcast more intuitive and user-friendly, which can significantly reduce the learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight that Hadoop HDFS has robust integration capabilities, particularly with Hadoop itself, scoring 9.1, which is crucial for organizations already invested in the Hadoop ecosystem, whereas Hazelcast Platform, while versatile, may not integrate as seamlessly with Hadoop-centric workflows.
- Users on G2 report that Hazelcast Platform shines in real-time processing capabilities, scoring 8.6, which is essential for applications requiring immediate data insights, while Hadoop HDFS, primarily designed for batch processing, may not meet the same real-time demands effectively.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Hazelcast Platform is rated higher at 8.7 compared to Hadoop HDFS's 7.8, indicating that users may experience better assistance and resources when troubleshooting or seeking guidance with Hazelcast.
- Users say that Hadoop HDFS's strong data lake capabilities, scoring 9.0, make it an excellent choice for organizations looking to build comprehensive data lakes, while Hazelcast Platform, although capable, may not provide the same level of functionality in this specific area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Hadoop HDFS
No pricing availableHazelcast Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Hadoop HDFS
No trial information availableHazelcast Platform
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
118
8.8
8
Ease of Use
7.5
120
8.5
9
Ease of Setup
6.9
47
8.0
5
Ease of Admin
7.1
44
8.0
5
Quality of Support
7.8
103
8.7
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
42
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
113
7.4
9
Features by Category
Data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Solution Provision
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Indexing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Filters
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
8.6
42
Not enough data
9.1
46
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
Integrations
9.1
44
Not enough data
8.8
40
Not enough data
Platform
8.3
40
Not enough data
8.4
43
Not enough data
8.8
40
Not enough data
Processing
8.7
36
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Hadoop HDFS and Hazelcast Platform are categorized as Big Data Processing and Distribution
Unique Categories
Hadoop HDFS has no unique categories
Hazelcast Platform is categorized as Event Stream Processing, Data Replication, Stream Analytics, Key Value Databases, Document Databases, Real-time Analytic Database, Time Series Databases, and Vector Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Hadoop HDFS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Hazelcast Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
24.0%
Information Technology and Services
21.7%
Internet
7.8%
Financial Services
4.7%
Higher Education
3.9%
Other
38.0%
Financial Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Telecommunications
8.3%
Retail
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Hadoop HDFS used for?
1 Comment
VV
Hadoop HDFS is used for storing large volume of data... so called 'Big Data'.
Read more
Hadoop HDFS has no more discussions with answers
Hazelcast Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
