Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GTreasury and Openlink 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ProAI
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Native Teams
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Paysafe
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (71.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GTreasury
Star Rating
(32)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GTreasuryOpenlink
Star Rating
(20)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (71.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenlinkSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GTreasury excels in ease of use with a score of 8.6, while Openlink falls short with a score of 6.3. Reviewers mention that GTreasury's intuitive interface simplifies cash management tasks significantly.
- Reviewers say that GTreasury's quality of support is rated at 8.3, compared to Openlink's 6.0. Users on G2 highlight GTreasury's responsive customer service as a key advantage, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- Users say that GTreasury offers superior cash flow management features, scoring 8.1 for file exports, while Openlink does not provide the same level of functionality, leading to frustrations in data handling for users.
- Reviewers mention that GTreasury's banking connectivity is rated at 8.0, which is significantly higher than Openlink's score of 6.7. Users appreciate GTreasury's seamless integration with various banking systems, enhancing operational efficiency.
- G2 users report that GTreasury shines in cash pooling capabilities with a score of 7.4, while Openlink's performance in this area is less favorable. Reviewers highlight GTreasury's ability to manage multiple accounts effectively, which is crucial for large enterprises.
- Users on G2 indicate that GTreasury's automated cash operations score 7.5, whereas Openlink's score of 6.7 reflects a lack of automation features. Reviewers mention that GTreasury's automation tools significantly reduce manual workload, improving overall productivity.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GTreasury
No pricing availableOpenlink
No pricing availableFree Trial
GTreasury
No trial information availableOpenlink
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
25
8.1
7
Ease of Use
8.3
26
6.3
8
Ease of Setup
7.7
11
5.4
8
Ease of Admin
8.1
7
6.7
6
Quality of Support
7.9
25
6.0
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
8
7.3
8
Product Direction (% positive)
7.0
23
4.2
8
Features by Category
Payment Methods
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Payment Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security and Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Payment Types
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Payment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cash Management
8.2
19
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
7.4
14
Not enough data
6.9
16
Not enough data
6.4
11
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
Risk and Compliance
6.5
13
Not enough data
6.5
13
Not enough data
6.2
11
Not enough data
5.9
11
Not enough data
Analytics
8.0
17
Not enough data
5.6
11
Not enough data
5.8
10
Not enough data
5.0
10
Not enough data
Banking
8.2
15
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
6.0
10
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
Integration
7.5
16
Not enough data
6.0
13
Not enough data
6.7
9
Not enough data
7.5
16
Not enough data
Financial Data Transfer
7.8
13
Not enough data
7.5
17
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
8.0
15
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Treasury Management Systems
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Commodity Trading, Transaction, and Risk Management (CTRM)Hide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
7.9
9
Trading
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.8
8
Risk
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.3
6
Back Office
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
6.3
8
Cash Flow Management
8.3
11
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
Cash Flow Forecasting
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
6.5
10
Not enough data
6.7
10
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
5.9
9
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
6.7
9
Not enough data
6.3
9
Not enough data
Financial Data Transfer
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cash Flow Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reconciliation - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Audit - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Permissions and Security - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GTreasury and Openlink are categorized as Treasury Management Systems
Unique Categories
Openlink is categorized as Commodity Trading, Transaction, and Risk Management (CTRM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GTreasury
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Openlink
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
12.9%
Accounting
12.9%
Retail
6.5%
Insurance
6.5%
Information Technology and Services
6.5%
Other
54.8%
Oil & Energy
42.9%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Utilities
7.1%
Medical Practice
7.1%
Investment Banking
7.1%
Other
21.4%
Discussions
GTreasury has no discussions with answers
Multi leg swap
1 Comment
MM
Yes. We did POC on ML swap for one of the business case on Endur.Read more
Openlink has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
