Compare Grant Lifecycle Manager and Submit.com

Save your comparisonKeep these tools in one place and come back anytime.
Save to board
At a Glance
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Star Rating
(24)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (83.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Grant Lifecycle Manager
Submit.com
Submit.com
Star Rating
(96)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $5,995.00 Per Year
Learn more about Submit.com
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that Submit.com excels in overall user satisfaction, reflected in its higher G2 Score of 70.1 compared to Grant Lifecycle Manager's 54.3. Users appreciate the platform's flexibility and the ability to design tailored application forms, making it a strong choice for organizations looking for customization.
  • According to verified reviews, Submit.com has a significantly larger number of reviews (71) compared to Grant Lifecycle Manager (24), which suggests a more reliable consensus on its performance. This larger user base contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of its strengths and weaknesses.
  • Users say that Grant Lifecycle Manager offers unique features like easy access to Candid and Docusign, which enhance the grant-making process. Reviewers highlight the software's ability to simplify form creation, allowing applicants to copy questions from previous forms, which can save time and reduce errors.
  • Reviewers mention that Submit.com provides a streamlined experience for collecting and reviewing applications, with all processes contained within a single system. This integration is praised for making communication and approvals more efficient, which is a significant advantage for organizations managing multiple grants.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that while Grant Lifecycle Manager has strong support features, with high ratings for quality of support, Submit.com slightly edges it out in overall usability. Users appreciate how easy it is to set up and manage tasks within Submit.com, which is reflected in its higher scores for ease of use and setup.
  • According to recent user feedback, both platforms have their strengths in specific functionalities, but Submit.com stands out with its robust reporting capabilities. Users find the reporting tools in Submit.com particularly handy for gaining quick insights, which can be crucial for decision-making in grant management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Grant Lifecycle Manager
No pricing available
Submit.com
Starter Package
Starting at $5,995.00
Per Year
Learn more about Submit.com
Free Trial
Grant Lifecycle Manager
No trial information available
Submit.com
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
23
9.5
79
Ease of Use
8.3
23
9.4
82
Ease of Setup
8.1
15
9.4
75
Ease of Admin
8.9
21
9.3
54
Quality of Support
9.5
23
9.8
77
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.7
21
9.7
54
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
23
9.8
77
Features by Category
Scholarship ManagementHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
Not enough data
8.9
14
Application Collection
Not enough data
9.6
13
Not enough data
9.5
13
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.1
13
Application Review
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Administration and Integrations
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
9.6
12
Not enough data
7.9
12
8.1
16
9.2
48
Proposal Management
9.0
16
9.6
36
9.0
16
9.1
37
9.4
16
9.4
35
9.4
16
9.4
38
8.0
15
9.4
41
Fund Tracking
7.7
14
8.9
29
Feature Not Available
9.4
31
8.8
15
9.3
39
Impact & Outcomes
8.3
16
|
Verified
9.2
32
7.6
16
|
Verified
9.0
32
7.5
16
|
Verified
9.1
35
Feature Not Available
9.5
36
Grant Prospecting
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Compliance
8.8
12
|
Verified
9.2
34
8.0
10
9.4
32
Integrations
6.7
10
|
Verified
8.8
30
5.7
9
8.8
28
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ReportingHide 20 FeaturesShow 20 Features
Not enough data
9.9
6
Data Collection
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management - Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting
Not enough data
10.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting - Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
10.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
9
Submission Management
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Judging Management
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
9.0
7
Awards Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Submit.com
Submit.com
Grant Lifecycle Manager and Submit.com are categorized as Grant Management
Unique Categories
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Grant Lifecycle Manager has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
83.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
8.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
8.3%
Submit.com
Submit.com
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
54.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
12.5%
Reviewers' Industry
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Non-Profit Organization Management
54.2%
Philanthropy
25.0%
Government Administration
8.3%
Program Development
4.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
4.2%
Submit.com
Submit.com
Non-Profit Organization Management
15.6%
Government Administration
14.4%
Education Management
10.0%
Entertainment
4.4%
Financial Services
4.4%
Other
51.1%
Alternatives
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Grant Lifecycle Manager Alternatives
Bloomerang CRM
Bloomerang CRM
Add Bloomerang CRM
Submittable
Submittable
Add Submittable
Benevity
Benevity
Add Benevity
Fluxx Grantmaker
Fluxx Software for Grantmakers
Add Fluxx Grantmaker
Submit.com
Submit.com Alternatives
Submittable
Submittable
Add Submittable
Bloomerang CRM
Bloomerang CRM
Add Bloomerang CRM
Workiva
Workiva
Add Workiva
Optro
Optro
Add Optro
Discussions
Grant Lifecycle Manager
Grant Lifecycle Manager Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Grant Lifecycle Manager has no discussions with answers
Submit.com
Submit.com Discussions
What is Submit.com used for?
1 Comment
MK
Lisle International uses Submit.com to manage the application processing of individuals applying for our annual grant cycle, the LIsle Global Seed Grant. ...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Submit.com has no more discussions with answers