Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Google Security Operations and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Google Security Operations
Google Security Operations
Star Rating
(50)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.5% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Security Operations
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Star Rating
(27)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.9% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Google Security Operations excels in Workflow Automation with a score of 9.7, indicating that its automated processes significantly enhance operational efficiency. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR scored 8.5 in this area, suggesting it may not automate workflows as effectively.
  • Reviewers mention that Google Security Operations offers superior Ease of Setup, scoring 7.2 compared to Cortex XSOAR's 9.2. This indicates that users find Google’s initial configuration more challenging, which could impact time to deployment.
  • G2 users highlight that Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR shines in Quality of Support, achieving a score of 8.8, while Google Security Operations scored 7.9. This suggests that users may find more responsive and helpful support from Palo Alto Networks.
  • Users on G2 report that Google Security Operations has a strong performance in Automated Remediation, scoring 9.7, which is higher than Cortex XSOAR's 8.9. This feature is crucial for organizations looking to quickly address security incidents without manual intervention.
  • Reviewers mention that Cortex XSOAR leads in Security Orchestration with a score of 9.1, compared to Google Security Operations' 8.0. This indicates that Cortex XSOAR may provide more robust integration capabilities with other security tools.
  • Users say that Google Security Operations has a notable advantage in Data Visualization, scoring 9.1, which helps users better understand their security posture. In contrast, Cortex XSOAR's capabilities in this area are less emphasized, potentially limiting user insights.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Security Operations
No pricing available
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
No pricing available
Free Trial
Google Security Operations
Free Trial is available
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
36
8.9
19
Ease of Use
8.1
36
8.7
21
Ease of Setup
7.5
26
8.9
18
Ease of Admin
7.8
20
8.8
15
Quality of Support
8.3
36
8.4
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
21
9.0
16
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
36
8.8
20
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Information
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Personalization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Threat Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
9.1
6
8.8
12
Automation
9.0
5
8.3
11
9.7
5
8.9
11
9.7
5
9.0
12
Not enough data
8.1
12
Orchestration
8.0
5
9.3
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
9.0
12
Response
9.3
5
9.2
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Google Security Operations
Google Security Operations
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Google Security Operations and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR are categorized as Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)
Unique Categories
Google Security Operations
Google Security Operations has no unique categories
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is categorized as Threat Intelligence
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Google Security Operations
Google Security Operations
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
47.5%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
18.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
29.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
51.9%
Reviewers' Industry
Google Security Operations
Google Security Operations
Information Technology and Services
37.5%
Telecommunications
10.0%
Computer Software
7.5%
Computer & Network Security
7.5%
Hospital & Health Care
5.0%
Other
32.5%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Computer & Network Security
37.0%
Manufacturing
7.4%
Information Technology and Services
7.4%
Events Services
7.4%
Consulting
3.7%
Other
37.0%
Alternatives
Google Security Operations
Google Security Operations Alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel
Add Microsoft Sentinel
Tines
Tines
Add Tines
Swimlane
Swimlane
Add Swimlane
Demisto
Demisto
Add Demisto
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel
Add Microsoft Sentinel
Splunk SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation and Response)
Splunk SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation and Response)
Add Splunk SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation and Response)
Tines
Tines
Add Tines
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Add Sumo Logic
Discussions
Google Security Operations
Google Security Operations Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Google Security Operations has no discussions with answers
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has no discussions with answers