Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and NetScaler 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Edgenexus ADC (Application Delivery Controller)
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (62.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial 0 Throughput, ADC Instances Per Year
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Star Rating
(258)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)NetScaler
Star Rating
(85)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (62.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial 0 Throughput, ADC Instances Per Year
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) excels in orchestration with a score of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for managing containerized applications, while NetScaler, although strong in network management, does not focus on orchestration to the same extent.
- Reviewers mention that GKE's container networking capabilities are rated at 8.6, providing seamless integration and communication between containers, whereas NetScaler's networking features are more geared towards traffic management and load balancing, which may not meet the needs of users looking for deep container networking functionalities.
- G2 users highlight that GKE offers robust logging and reporting features, which are essential for monitoring application performance and troubleshooting, while NetScaler's reporting capabilities are more focused on network performance metrics, potentially leaving application-level insights lacking.
- Users on G2 appreciate GKE's strong security features, particularly in workload protection and security auditing, with a focus on container security, while NetScaler is noted for its application security and traffic controls, which may not provide the same level of protection for containerized environments.
- Reviewers say that GKE's developer toolkit, although rated lower at 7.7, still provides essential tools for developers working with Kubernetes, while NetScaler's toolkit is more focused on network management, which may not cater to developers looking for container-specific tools.
- Users report that GKE's product direction is highly rated at 9.3, indicating a strong commitment to evolving with user needs, while NetScaler's product direction score of 8.5 suggests it may not be as responsive to changes in the container orchestration landscape.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
No pricing availableNetScaler
Advanced Edition
Free Trial
0 Throughput, ADC Instances Per Year
Advanced Edition is available in either a hardware or software-based appliance.
Hardware options include single and multi-tenant devices, in addition to FIPS compliant and high SSL appliances.
Software-based options include virtual hypervisor-based and bare metal software offerings.
- https://www.citrix.com/lp/try/citrix-networking-vpx-express.html
- Surge protection and priority queuing
- TriScale Clustering
Free Trial
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
No trial information availableNetScaler
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
141
9.1
58
Ease of Use
8.5
143
8.6
59
Ease of Setup
8.4
90
8.2
35
Ease of Admin
8.2
75
8.8
35
Quality of Support
8.1
134
8.4
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
72
8.8
36
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
133
8.3
54
Features by Category
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Controls
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.4
66
Not enough data
8.5
65
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Organization
8.4
67
Not enough data
8.6
70
Not enough data
9.0
71
Not enough data
Development
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
66
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and NetScaler are categorized as Container Networking
Unique Categories
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is categorized as Container Orchestration, Container Management, and Service Discovery
NetScaler is categorized as Zero Trust Networking, Container Security, Web Application Firewall (WAF), and Load Balancing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
NetScaler
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
21.0%
Information Technology and Services
19.6%
Retail
5.1%
Financial Services
4.7%
Banking
4.2%
Other
45.3%
Information Technology and Services
13.8%
Hospital & Health Care
13.8%
Financial Services
7.5%
Banking
5.0%
Pharmaceuticals
3.8%
Other
56.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) used for?
1 Comment
SK
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is a tool that helps manage and organize your computer programs. It uses containers to neatly package each part of your...Read more
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) has no more discussions with answers
Is Citrix ADC the same as NetScaler?
3 Comments
ND
Citrix NetScaler refers to their Application Delivery Controller, or ADC, line of products, while the NetScaler Gateway, formerly known as the Citrix Access...Read more
NetScaler has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
