Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Google Cloud Spanner and PostgreSQL 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (35.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Google Cloud Spanner
Star Rating
(35)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud SpannerPostgreSQL
Star Rating
(663)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (35.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PostgreSQLSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that PostgreSQL excels in its Data Schema management with a score of 9.2, allowing for complex data structures, while Google Cloud Spanner, with a score of 8.1, is noted for its more rigid schema requirements, which can limit flexibility.
- Reviewers mention that PostgreSQL's Query Language is highly praised, scoring 9.2, as it supports advanced SQL features, whereas Google Cloud Spanner, scoring 8.9, is recognized for its SQL compatibility but lacks some of the advanced functionalities that PostgreSQL offers.
- G2 users highlight that Google Cloud Spanner shines in Data Replication with a score of 9.2, providing seamless multi-region replication, while PostgreSQL, scoring 8.9, offers replication but may require more manual configuration and management.
- Users on G2 report that PostgreSQL's Ease of Use is rated at 8.5, making it accessible for small businesses, while Google Cloud Spanner, with a score of 8.0, is perceived as more complex, which may pose a learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Spanner's Encryption capabilities are robust, scoring 9.4, providing strong security features out of the box, while PostgreSQL, with a score of 8.5, offers encryption but may require additional setup for optimal security.
- Users say that PostgreSQL's Backup options, scoring 6.7, are often seen as less comprehensive compared to Google Cloud Spanner's more automated and reliable backup solutions, which can be crucial for enterprise-level applications.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Cloud Spanner
No pricing availablePostgreSQL
No pricing availableFree Trial
Google Cloud Spanner
No trial information availablePostgreSQL
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
24
9.1
543
Ease of Use
7.8
24
8.5
548
Ease of Setup
8.2
10
8.4
277
Ease of Admin
8.7
9
8.2
249
Quality of Support
8.6
20
7.9
439
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
10
8.4
198
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
22
8.5
530
Features by Category
Management
8.1
6
9.1
121
8.9
6
9.1
119
9.2
6
9.1
107
9.2
6
8.9
110
Support
8.7
5
8.6
113
8.3
6
9.2
123
Not enough data
9.1
110
8.6
6
9.1
112
Security
8.7
5
8.7
114
8.7
5
8.9
116
9.4
6
8.6
108
9.2
6
8.9
110
Performance
7.8
6
8.6
106
9.2
6
8.8
112
8.9
6
8.6
106
7.5
6
8.8
111
8.7
5
8.6
109
Database Features
9.5
13
9.0
460
8.6
13
9.0
465
9.0
13
9.0
468
9.2
13
8.6
450
8.9
12
8.7
439
8.3
13
8.8
453
8.6
13
9.0
460
Configuration
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.2
10
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
Availability
8.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Google Cloud Spanner and PostgreSQL are categorized as Relational Databases
Unique Categories
Google Cloud Spanner is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
PostgreSQL has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Google Cloud Spanner
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PostgreSQL
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Biotechnology
6.7%
Sports
3.3%
Other
46.7%
Information Technology and Services
27.3%
Computer Software
23.1%
Internet
4.3%
Financial Services
4.1%
Telecommunications
2.9%
Other
38.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Google Cloud Spanner has no discussions with answers
What are the advantages and disadvantages of PostgreSQL?
2 Comments
AG
Open Source: PostgreSQL is free and open-source software, meaning anyone can download, use, and modify it as needed without licensing costs.
SQL...Read more
Can we get some video tutorials on usage? Also how do we connect them over cloud ?
1 Comment
NH
Hey Jay,
We use Postgresql on all of our cloud servers. We connect via SSL connections to the specific...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
