Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Google Cloud Spanner and Neo4j Graph Database 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Google Cloud Spanner
Star Rating
(35)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud SpannerNeo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in data modeling with its flexible graph structure, allowing for complex relationships to be easily represented, while Google Cloud Spanner is noted for its robust SQL support, making it easier for users familiar with traditional relational databases to adapt.
- Reviewers mention that Neo4j's query language, Cypher, is intuitive and user-friendly, which enhances the ease of use, whereas Google Cloud Spanner's SQL-like query language is powerful but can be more challenging for new users to master.
- G2 users highlight that Neo4j offers superior data replication capabilities, with a score of 9.2, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance, while Google Cloud Spanner also performs well in this area but is often praised for its global distribution features.
- Users on G2 report that Neo4j's performance in handling complex queries is impressive, particularly for graph-based data, while Google Cloud Spanner shines in scalability, with users noting its ability to handle large-scale applications seamlessly.
- Reviewers say that Neo4j's built-in search functionality is a valuable feature for quickly retrieving data, while Google Cloud Spanner's advanced indexing capabilities are frequently mentioned as a key strength for optimizing query performance.
- Users report that Neo4j's community support is robust, with many resources available for troubleshooting, while Google Cloud Spanner is recognized for its strong enterprise-level support, making it a preferred choice for larger organizations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Cloud Spanner
No pricing availableNeo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Free Trial
Google Cloud Spanner
No trial information availableNeo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
24
8.5
73
Ease of Use
7.8
24
8.2
75
Ease of Setup
8.2
10
8.7
31
Ease of Admin
8.7
9
8.0
28
Quality of Support
8.6
20
8.5
64
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
10
8.8
24
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
22
9.0
68
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
Support
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Security
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
Performance
7.8
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Database Features
9.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
9.0
13
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Availability
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Performance
Not enough data
7.4
19
Security
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Support
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Configuration
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.2
10
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
Availability
8.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Google Cloud Spanner and Neo4j Graph Database are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Google Cloud Spanner is categorized as Relational Databases
Neo4j Graph Database is categorized as Graph Databases and Database Management Systems (DBMS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Google Cloud Spanner
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
6.7%
Biotechnology
6.7%
Sports
3.3%
Other
46.7%
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Google Cloud Spanner has no discussions with answers
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What companies use neo4j?
1 Comment
Official Response from Neo4j Graph Database
Great question. This page https://neo4j.com/customers/ has a shortlist of referenceable customers. Comcast, eBay, Adobe, and Microsoft, to name a few. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
