Users report that RabbitMQ excels in asynchronous messaging with a score of 8.6, while Google Cloud Pub/Sub shines with a higher score of 9.0, indicating a more robust handling of message queuing and delivery.
Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Pub/Sub offers superior cloud-based messaging capabilities, scoring 9.2 compared to RabbitMQ's 7.8, making it a better choice for users looking for a fully managed cloud solution.
G2 users highlight that RabbitMQ has a strong focus on application integration, scoring 8.4, but Google Cloud Pub/Sub outperforms it with a score of 8.9, suggesting better compatibility with various applications and services.
Users on G2 report that RabbitMQ's latency is rated at 8.0, which is favorable, but Google Cloud Pub/Sub's latency score of 7.1 indicates potential delays, which could be a concern for time-sensitive applications.
Reviewers mention that both products have similar scores for policies and controls at 8.0, but Google Cloud Pub/Sub's security monitoring is rated higher at 8.5, suggesting a more robust security framework for users concerned about data protection.
Users say that RabbitMQ's ease of setup is rated at 8.3, while Google Cloud Pub/Sub has a slightly better score of 8.8, indicating that users may find it easier to get started with Google’s offering.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
No pricing available
RabbitMQ
No pricing available
Free Trial
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
No trial information available
RabbitMQ
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
26
8.7
40
Ease of Use
8.6
27
8.4
40
Ease of Setup
9.0
8
8.3
14
Ease of Admin
7.8
6
8.5
14
Quality of Support
8.8
23
8.2
32
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.