Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Google Cloud Memorystore and Memcached 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (68.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Google Cloud Memorystore
Star Rating
(48)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud MemorystoreMemcached
Star Rating
(17)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MemcachedSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Memcached excels in ease of use with a score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for straightforward caching solutions. In contrast, Google Cloud Memorystore, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower ease of use rating at 8.7, which some users feel may require a bit more technical knowledge to navigate effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Memcached's performance shines with an integrated cache score of 8.7, which is particularly beneficial for applications needing fast data retrieval. Google Cloud Memorystore, however, offers a more robust overall performance with a storage score of 8.5 and a higher availability score of 9.0, indicating its reliability in production environments.
- G2 users highlight Memcached's strong data replication capabilities with a score of 8.9, which is crucial for maintaining data consistency across distributed systems. On the other hand, Google Cloud Memorystore's advanced data analytics feature, rated at 9.0, allows users to gain deeper insights into their data usage patterns, which can be a significant advantage for data-driven businesses.
- Users on G2 report that Memcached's auto sharding feature, rated at 8.7, helps in managing large datasets efficiently. However, Google Cloud Memorystore's scalability score of 9.0 is a standout feature, allowing businesses to easily adjust their resources based on demand, which is particularly appealing for growing companies.
- Reviewers mention that while Memcached has a solid governance score of 8.7, Google Cloud Memorystore outperforms it in security with a score of 9.0, highlighting its robust authentication and encryption features that are essential for businesses handling sensitive data.
- Users say that Memcached's simplicity in setup is a major plus, but Google Cloud Memorystore's comprehensive support and documentation, reflected in its quality of support score of 8.5, provide a more reliable safety net for users who may encounter issues during implementation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Cloud Memorystore
No pricing availableMemcached
No pricing availableFree Trial
Google Cloud Memorystore
No trial information availableMemcached
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
40
9.5
14
Ease of Use
8.7
41
9.4
14
Ease of Setup
9.0
10
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.2
11
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
37
8.7
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
11
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
40
6.7
14
Features by Category
Data Management
8.0
15
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
Availability
8.7
14
Not enough data
8.3
14
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
Performance
8.7
14
Not enough data
Security
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.3
14
Feature Not Available
8.3
13
Feature Not Available
8.5
14
Not enough data
Support
8.8
14
Feature Not Available
8.3
14
Not enough data
Configuration
8.9
23
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Availability
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Security
8.5
23
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
Data Management
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Google Cloud Memorystore and Memcached are categorized as Key Value Databases
Unique Categories
Google Cloud Memorystore is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Memcached has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Google Cloud Memorystore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Memcached
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
22.2%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer & Network Security
11.1%
Telecommunications
4.4%
Retail
4.4%
Other
37.8%
Computer Software
31.3%
Internet
25.0%
Marketing and Advertising
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Real Estate
6.3%
Other
12.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Google Cloud Memorystore has no discussions with answers
Memcached has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
