Users report that Google Cloud Load Balancing excels in scalability, with a score of 9.2, allowing businesses to handle varying traffic loads seamlessly. In contrast, HAProxy also performs well in this area but is often noted for requiring more manual configuration to achieve optimal scalability.
Reviewers mention that HAProxy shines in its ease of setup, scoring 8.6 compared to Google Cloud Load Balancing's 8.3. Users appreciate HAProxy's straightforward installation process, especially for those familiar with open-source solutions.
G2 users highlight the superior quality of support for HAProxy, which received a score of 9.0, while Google Cloud Load Balancing scored 8.5. Reviewers often commend HAProxy's responsive community and extensive documentation, making troubleshooting more accessible.
Users on G2 report that Google Cloud Load Balancing offers robust API integrations, scoring 9.1, which is crucial for businesses looking to automate and streamline their workflows. HAProxy, while also strong in API integrations, received a slightly lower score of 9.2, indicating a competitive but less comprehensive offering.
Reviewers say that Google Cloud Load Balancing provides excellent performance and reliability, scoring 9.6, which is often highlighted as a key factor for businesses that prioritize uptime and speed. HAProxy, while reliable, does not match this level of performance consistency according to user feedback.
Users report that HAProxy's open-source nature allows for greater extensibility, scoring 9.4, which appeals to developers looking for customizable solutions. In contrast, Google Cloud Load Balancing, while feature-rich, is perceived as less flexible due to its proprietary nature.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.