Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Google Cloud BigTable and Neo4j Graph Database 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuestDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Google Cloud BigTable
Star Rating
(41)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud BigTableNeo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Google Cloud BigTable excels in scalability, with a score of 9.4, making it ideal for handling large datasets and high-traffic applications. In contrast, Neo4j Graph Database scores 7.9 in this area, which may limit its effectiveness for users with extensive data needs.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud BigTable offers superior data storage capabilities, achieving a score of 9.4, while Neo4j's storage features are rated at 8.3. This difference highlights BigTable's strength in managing vast amounts of structured data efficiently.
- G2 users indicate that Google Cloud BigTable has a robust query optimization feature, scoring 7.3, which enhances performance for complex queries. Conversely, Neo4j's query language is praised for its flexibility, scoring 8.6, making it more user-friendly for graph-based queries.
- Users on G2 report that Google Cloud BigTable's security features, including data encryption and role-based authorization, are highly rated at 9.3, providing peace of mind for sensitive data management. Neo4j, however, falls short with a security score of 6.8, which may raise concerns for users prioritizing data protection.
- Reviewers say that Google Cloud BigTable's ease of use is rated at 8.9, making it accessible for teams with varying technical expertise. In contrast, Neo4j's ease of use score of 8.2 suggests a steeper learning curve, particularly for those unfamiliar with graph databases.
- Users report that Google Cloud BigTable's quality of support is rated at 8.4, indicating a reliable support system for troubleshooting and guidance. Neo4j's support quality, rated at 8.5, is also commendable, but the difference may influence users who require more extensive assistance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Cloud BigTable
No pricing availableNeo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Free Trial
Google Cloud BigTable
No trial information availableNeo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
29
8.5
73
Ease of Use
8.4
29
8.2
75
Ease of Setup
8.5
9
8.7
31
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.0
28
Quality of Support
8.2
25
8.5
64
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.8
24
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
29
9.0
68
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Availability
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Performance
Not enough data
7.4
19
Security
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Support
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scalability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.2
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
6.8
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
Database Administration
7.8
9
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
Availability
8.6
12
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Google Cloud BigTable and Neo4j Graph Database are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Google Cloud BigTable is categorized as Time Series Databases, Columnar Databases, and Wide Column Database
Neo4j Graph Database is categorized as Graph Databases and Database Management Systems (DBMS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Google Cloud BigTable
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
13.5%
Computer Software
13.5%
Marketing and Advertising
8.1%
Financial Services
8.1%
Telecommunications
5.4%
Other
51.4%
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Google Cloud BigTable used for?
1 Comment
SM
Google Cloud Bigtable is a fully managed NoSQL database service provided by Google Cloud Platform (GCP).
It is used for handling huge volumes of data...Read more
Google Cloud BigTable has no more discussions with answers
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What companies use neo4j?
1 Comment
Official Response from Neo4j Graph Database
Great question. This page https://neo4j.com/customers/ has a shortlist of referenceable customers. Comcast, eBay, Adobe, and Microsoft, to name a few. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
