Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Google Artifact Registry and JFrog 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (60.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
Google Artifact Registry
Star Rating
(23)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (60.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Artifact RegistryJFrog
Star Rating
(105)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that JFrog's Extensibility score of 9.3 is a standout feature, allowing for seamless integration with various CI/CD tools, which enhances its adaptability in diverse environments. In contrast, Google Artifact Registry, while functional, does not match this level of extensibility, leading some users to feel limited in customization options.
- Reviewers mention that JFrog excels in Deployment Automation with a score of 8.3, providing robust tools for automating the deployment process. Google Artifact Registry, however, has received feedback indicating that its deployment features are less comprehensive, which can slow down workflows for teams looking for efficiency.
- G2 users highlight JFrog's superior Quality of Support with a score of 8.5, noting that the support team is responsive and knowledgeable. In comparison, Google Artifact Registry's support, rated at 8.6, is considered good but lacks the same level of personalized assistance that JFrog users often praise.
- Users on G2 report that JFrog's Administration Console is user-friendly and intuitive, making it easier for teams to manage their artifacts. Conversely, Google Artifact Registry's administration features, while functional, are described as less intuitive, which can lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers say that JFrog's Versioning capabilities are robust, allowing for detailed tracking and management of package versions, which is crucial for maintaining software integrity. Google Artifact Registry, while it offers versioning, does not provide the same depth of features, leading some users to feel it lacks in this critical area.
- Users report that JFrog's Process Analytics score of 8.7 is a significant advantage, providing insights into workflow efficiency and bottlenecks. Google Artifact Registry, while offering basic analytics, does not provide the same level of detail, which can hinder teams' ability to optimize their processes effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Google Artifact Registry
No pricing availableJFrog
PRO
Starting at $150.00
Per Month
Automated Artifact and Container Registry for Individuals & Small teams
- Universal Binary Repository
- Release Lifecycle Management
- Unlimited Docker Hub Pulls
Free Trial
Google Artifact Registry
No trial information availableJFrog
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
21
8.5
76
Ease of Use
8.5
21
8.2
77
Ease of Setup
8.9
9
8.2
45
Ease of Admin
9.1
9
8.5
38
Quality of Support
8.7
21
8.4
66
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
9
8.5
37
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
21
8.5
70
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Functionality
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Processes
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
7.3
8
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Management
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
6.7
7
Not enough data
6.5
8
Not enough data
6.0
7
Not enough data
5.8
6
Management
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
6.9
7
Not enough data
4.0
5
Not enough data
6.2
7
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
6.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.3
10
Functionality
Not enough data
6.1
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
6.0
10
Processes
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Functionality
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.8
9
Management
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
9
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Google Artifact Registry and JFrog are categorized as Container Registry and Repository Management
Unique Categories
Google Artifact Registry has no unique categories
JFrog is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, MLOps Platforms, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Continuous Delivery, Continuous Integration, and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Google Artifact Registry
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
JFrog
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.1%
Computer Software
17.4%
Computer & Network Security
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Sporting Goods
4.3%
Other
39.1%
Information Technology and Services
32.3%
Computer Software
14.1%
Financial Services
7.1%
Computer & Network Security
6.1%
Internet
3.0%
Other
37.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Google Artifact Registry has no discussions with answers
JFrog has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
