Link copied to clipboard

# Good Grants vs Submit.com Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/good-grants/submit-com/export.csv)

Good GrantsSubmit.com[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**Good Grants**
Free Trial

**Contact Us** Per Year · Enterprise

**Submit.com**
Free Trial

**Starting at $5,995.00** Per Year · Starter Package

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Good Grants**
2 months

Based on 32 responses

**Submit.com**
1 monthFaster

Based on 6 responses

Return on Investment

**Good Grants**
13 months

Based on 31 responses

**Submit.com**
8 months5 months sooner

Based on 5 responses

Perceived Cost

**Good Grants**
$$$$$

**Submit.com**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Good Grants**
10%2% more

**Submit.com**
8%

 ![Good Grants](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c4b1dfcf493d76840aee78c4e36c3704/good-grants.svg "Good Grants")

 ![Submit.com](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c7e39fe3180ee8d96beea76fbf369c20/submit-com.svg "Submit.com")

G2 offers free advice on this comparison.

Chat with an expert

How would you like to receive Software Advice?

 ![](/assets/advisor_router/laptop_form-f1a7012279826105416befde8d882ffc7589b1f9db09c93a1379d601cafe8e0d.svg)

FormAnswer questions at your own pace, no call required.

 ![](/assets/advisor_router/ai_agent-4d78629a3ba354fed449a65c60df3a6f2eda90fb98411b711df4b25d7be52a38.svg)

AI AgentChat live and get a recommendation in minutes.

 ![](/assets/advisor_router/phone_call_picker-c48821ec36f4182d8ee3e54cfbd3937500eec54d7b7e0cfb80dc80a8a733842f.svg)

Phone CallTalk it through live with a software advisor.

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**Good Grants**
Not enough data

**Submit.com**
[
Ease of Use (9)
](https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1613900&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Customer Support (4)
](https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1614152&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Steep Learning Curve (3)
](https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2249424&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Setup Difficulties (2)
](https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2249485&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

Integrations

**Good Grants**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_991e30a948dd2fecd8e4aeedb128da88/ai-image-detector.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

AI Image Detector

](https://www.g2.com/products/ai-image-detector/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_27b2c94e62c492231d722d3e8aa82db4/deepl-translate.png "Product Avatar Image")

DeepL Translate

](https://www.g2.com/products/deepl-translate/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_722749e78ff3b4b89b4252ce169d7dfd/make.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Make

](https://www.g2.com/products/make/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_218a6468d313312e43446d6a8135f441/microsoft-teams.png "Product Avatar Image")

Microsoft Teams

](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-teams/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/good-grants/integrations)

**Submit.com**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_6b56bdb3ed766bf608d02c1c97144acd/microsoft-access.png "Product Avatar Image")

Microsoft Access

](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-access/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_b8b49f2b6f9cd484b0efa52a4abd8269/microsoft-microsoft-power-bi.png "Product Avatar Image")

Microsoft Power BI

](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-microsoft-power-bi/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/integrations)

Screenshots

**Good Grants**
 ![Good Grants screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/140132/Good-Grants-clients-2.png)

**Submit.com**
 ![Submit.com screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/200917/Help-Center.png)

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**Good Grants**

**8.8** /10

Based on 68 responses

**Submit.com**

**9.5** /10

Based on 89 responses

Ease of Use

**Good Grants**

**8.1** /10

Based on 79 responses

**Submit.com**

**9.5** /10

Based on 93 responses

Ease of Setup

**Good Grants**

**7.9** /10

Based on 62 responses

**Submit.com**

**9.4** /10

Based on 86 responses

Ease of Admin

**Good Grants**

**8.3** /10

Based on 45 responses

**Submit.com**

**9.3** /10

Based on 57 responses

Quality of Support

**Good Grants**

**9.3** /10

Based on 63 responses

**Submit.com**

**9.8** /10

Based on 87 responses

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Good Grants**

**9.4** /10

Based on 44 responses

**Submit.com**

**9.7** /10

Based on 57 responses

Product Direction (% positive)

**Good Grants**

**8.9** /10

Based on 62 responses

**Submit.com**

**9.9** /10

Based on 88 responses

**Features**
ratings from reviews

Scholarship Management

**8.3** /10

Based on 12 responses

**8.9** /10

Based on 14 responses

Grant Management

**6.5** /10

Based on 53 responses

**9.3** /10

Based on 58 responses

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting

Not enough data

**9.9** /10

Based on 6 responses

Awards Management

Not enough data

**8.8** /10

Based on 11 responses

User Insights

**Reviewers' Company Size**

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
72.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.2%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
4.9%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
72.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.2%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
4.9%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
52.3%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.1%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
15.6%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
52.3%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
32.1%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
15.6%

**Reviewers' Industry**

[![Good Grants](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c4b1dfcf493d76840aee78c4e36c3704/good-grants.svg "Good Grants")](https://www.g2.com/products/good-grants/reviews)
Good Grants

Non-Profit Organization Management
32.9%

Higher Education
10.6%

Education Management
9.4%

Research
7.1%

Philanthropy
4.7%

Other
35.3%

[![Submit.com](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c7e39fe3180ee8d96beea76fbf369c20/submit-com.svg "Submit.com")](https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/reviews)
Submit.com

Government Administration
14.9%

Non-Profit Organization Management
13.9%

Education Management
8.9%

Financial Services
5.9%

Manufacturing
4.0%

Other
52.5%

Alternatives

**Good Grants Alternatives**

 ![Bloomerang CRM](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/bbbadb2cfe33347bec3bcdfc4544b51c/bloomerang-crm.svg "Bloomerang CRM")

[
Bloomerang CRM
](/products/bloomerang-crm/reviews)

 ![Submittable](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/6434e9b41bfeb1bd37f8d904b12c58c1/submittable.svg "Submittable")

[
Submittable
](/products/submittable/reviews)

 ![Instrumentl](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/fb7d1bccc0f1f0769cf5e854d1b391f1/instrumentl.svg "Instrumentl")

[
Instrumentl
](/products/instrumentl/reviews)

 ![OpenWater Application and Review Cloud](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/44c96a20bbbd634cae11918a0ed20d88/openwater-application-and-review-cloud.svg "OpenWater Application and Review Cloud")

[
OpenWater Application and...
](/products/openwater-application-and-review-cloud/reviews)

**Submit.com Alternatives**

 ![Submittable](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/6434e9b41bfeb1bd37f8d904b12c58c1/submittable.svg "Submittable")

[
Submittable
](/products/submittable/reviews)

 ![Bloomerang CRM](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/bbbadb2cfe33347bec3bcdfc4544b51c/bloomerang-crm.svg "Bloomerang CRM")

[
Bloomerang CRM
](/products/bloomerang-crm/reviews)

 ![Workiva](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8845cbdae0f5f9ef98fcde16c1e2f544/workiva-workiva.svg "Workiva")

[
Workiva
](/products/workiva-workiva/reviews)

 ![Adaptive from Workday](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/98b8004ca518f3da663ebb902f0c9bab/adaptive-from-workday.svg "Adaptive from Workday")

[
Adaptive from Workday
](/products/adaptive-from-workday/reviews)

## Good Grants vs Submit.com FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 16, 2026

### What is the difference between Submit.com vs Good Grants?

Submit.com stands out for higher reviewer satisfaction in setup, support, and usability compared to Good Grants.

| [Submit.com](https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/reviews) | [Good Grants](https://www.g2.com/products/good-grants/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.8/5 (106 reviews) | 4.5/5 (90 reviews) |
| Small-Business | Small-Business |
| 9.4 | 7.9 |
| 9.8 | 9.3 |
| Ease of Use (9 all-time mentions) | — |

### How do the pricing models of Submit.com and Good Grants compare?

Submit.com is rated as the stronger value by reviewers, with higher satisfaction on price and cost-related dimensions.

- **Submit.com:** In recent reviews, many highlight a strong balance of pricing and performance, with several noting exceptional value for small organizations and non-profits.
- **Good Grants:** Reviewers describe the pricing as reasonable for the feature set, but some mention that entry-level plans are limited and that higher-tier features may be costly for infrequent users.
- **Switching reasons:** Recent reviewers cite moving to Submit.com for better value and more flexible configuration compared to other platforms.

### What are the best alternatives to Submit.com and Good Grants?

The top three alternatives to Submit.com and Good Grants are Bloomerang CRM, Submittable, and Workiva.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Submit.com](https://www.g2.com/products/submit-com/reviews) | 4.8/5 (106 reviews) | Small-Business | Strong value for small organizations | Ease of Use (9 all-time mentions) |
| [Good Grants](https://www.g2.com/products/good-grants/reviews) | 4.5/5 (90 reviews) | Small-Business | Reasonable for features, but entry plans limited | User-friendly interface |
| [Bloomerang CRM](https://www.g2.com/products/bloomerang-crm/reviews) | 4.6/5 (914 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Donor management and CRM capabilities |
| [Submittable](https://www.g2.com/products/submittable/reviews) | 4.5/5 (168 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Submission management and workflow automation |
| [Workiva](https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews) | 4.5/5 (2147 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Enterprise reporting and compliance |

### Which Grant Management features should I prioritize when comparing Submit.com and Good Grants?

Buyers should prioritize Ease of Use, Quality of Support, Reporting, Customization, and Automation when comparing Submit.com and Good Grants.

- **Ease of Use:** Submit.com 9.5, Good Grants 8.1; 9 all-time mentions for Submit.com.
- **Quality of Support:** Submit.com 9.8, Good Grants 9.3; 4 all-time mentions for Submit.com.
- **Reporting:** Reporting is the most frequently mentioned feature across both products.
- **Customization:** Submit.com (2 all-time mentions); Good Grants reviewers note flexibility and editable forms.
- **Automation:** Submit.com (2 all-time mentions); Good Grants reviewers highlight automated features and workflow streamlining.

### What are the pros and cons of Submit.com vs Good Grants?

Submit.com's headline strength is ease of use, while Good Grants is recognized for its user-friendly interface and flexibility.

- **Submit.com strengths:** Ease of Use (9 all-time mentions), Customer Support (4), Efficiency (3), Functionality (3), Implementation Ease (3), Intuitive (3), Adaptability (2), Automation (2), Customization (2), Tracking (2), User Interface (2), Document Management (1), Easy Integrations (1), Helpful (1), Reporting (1).
- **Submit.com trade-offs:** Steep Learning Curve (3), Setup Difficulties (2), Complex Setup (1), Confusing Interface (1), Search Functionality (1).
- **Good Grants strengths:** Reviewers highlight a user-friendly interface, flexible and editable forms, and strong customer support.
- **Good Grants trade-offs:** Some reviewers note backend complexity, limited entry-level features, and a learning curve for advanced configuration.

### Is Submit.com or Good Grants better for small businesses?

Submit.com is the better fit for small businesses, with higher satisfaction among small-business reviewers and a stronger value proposition.

- **Submit.com:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers consistently praise ease of use, strong support, and value for small organizations and non-profits.
- **Good Grants:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers note user-friendly setup and flexible forms, but some mention limitations in entry-level features for smaller programs.

### Which Grant Management platform has better integrations?

Good Grants is favored for integrations, with more reviewer-cited integration options than Submit.com.

- **Submit.com:** Reviewers mention easy integrations, but no specific third-party tools are cited in recent reviews.
- **Good Grants:** Make (22 all-time mentions), Zapier (1 all-time mention) are cited as integration options by reviewers.

### How do Submit.com and Good Grants compare on customer support?

Submit.com and Good Grants are rated near parity on Quality of Support, with Submit.com holding a slight advantage (9.8 vs 9.3).

- **Submit.com:** Reviewers consistently praise responsive, helpful, and accessible support, with 4 all-time mentions for customer support.
- **Good Grants:** Reviewers highlight prompt, 24/7 support and knowledgeable customer success managers, with strong satisfaction in recent reviews.

### Which is easier to implement, Submit.com or Good Grants?

Submit.com is rated higher for Ease of Setup (9.4 vs 7.9), indicating a smoother implementation experience than Good Grants.

- **Submit.com:** Reviewers frequently describe setup as easy, intuitive, and well-supported, with multiple mentions of quick onboarding and minimal IT involvement.
- **Good Grants:** Reviewers note straightforward initial setup and helpful support, but some mention backend complexity and a learning curve for advanced features.

### Which product has better Reporting?

Submit.com is favored for Reporting, with more frequent reviewer mentions and higher satisfaction scores.

- **Submit.com:** Reporting is the most frequently mentioned feature, with reviewers citing strong native reporting, real-time dashboards, and transparency; Meets Requirements score 9.5, Ease of Admin 9.3, Reporting (1 all-time mention).
- **Good Grants:** Reviewers note reporting capabilities and structured workflows, but some mention limitations in dashboard customization and report downloads; Meets Requirements score 8.8, Ease of Admin 8.3.