Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GNU Octave and Simulink 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (43.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GNU Octave
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU OctaveSimulink
Star Rating
(98)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SimulinkSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Simulink excels in its 3D/solid modeling tools, receiving a score of 8.3, while GNU Octave shines with a remarkable score of 9.5 in the same category, indicating a stronger capability for users focused on advanced modeling.
- Reviewers mention that Simulink's editing tools are rated at 8.8, which is higher than GNU Octave's score of 8.2, suggesting that users find Simulink's editing features more robust and user-friendly for their design needs.
- G2 users highlight that Simulink's data visualization capabilities score 8.9, showcasing its strength in presenting complex data effectively, whereas GNU Octave does not have a comparable feature, which may limit its appeal for users prioritizing data presentation.
- Users on G2 indicate that Simulink's continuous event modeling is rated at 8.4, outperforming GNU Octave's score of 7.9, suggesting that Simulink may be better suited for users needing reliable continuous event simulations.
- Reviewers say that GNU Octave's hardware support is rated at 8.7, which is higher than Simulink's 7.8, indicating that users may find GNU Octave more compatible with a wider range of hardware setups.
- Users report that Simulink's quality of support is rated at 8.0, while GNU Octave's support is slightly better at 8.2, suggesting that users may experience more responsive assistance with GNU Octave when encountering issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Octave
No pricing availableSimulink
No pricing availableFree Trial
GNU Octave
No trial information availableSimulink
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
43
8.4
82
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.0
88
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
39
7.9
86
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
41
8.9
87
Features by Category
Administration
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Capabilities
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
Methodology
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
9.5
10
8.3
14
8.3
11
8.3
15
8.2
10
8.8
15
8.2
10
7.6
11
Tools
8.5
11
8.2
12
8.3
11
8.2
13
8.2
10
8.2
13
Work
9.0
10
9.1
15
7.9
11
8.4
16
8.2
11
8.6
13
8.8
11
8.3
8
8.0
11
8.2
13
Environment
8.7
10
7.7
14
8.5
11
8.0
17
8.3
10
8.2
10
9.0
10
8.7
17
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Octave
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Simulink
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Research
11.3%
Computer Software
11.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Food Production
5.7%
Other
60.4%
Information Technology and Services
17.9%
Automotive
13.7%
Higher Education
10.5%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
8.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
6.3%
Other
43.2%
Discussions
GNU Octave has no discussions with answers
Simulink has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
