Users report that GNU Octave excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a rating of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for those needing advanced modeling capabilities, while Orange lacks this feature entirely.
Reviewers mention that Orange shines in data visualization with a score of 9.1, providing users with intuitive and interactive visual tools, whereas GNU Octave, while competent, scores slightly lower at 8.9.
G2 users highlight that GNU Octave offers robust quality control features with a rating of 8.4, which is particularly beneficial for users focused on precision, while Orange's quality control features are rated lower at 7.6.
Users on G2 report that Orange has superior ease of setup and ease of administration, both rated at 9.0, making it more user-friendly for beginners compared to GNU Octave, which does not have specific ratings in these areas.
Reviewers say that GNU Octave provides strong support for ANOVA with a rating of 8.8, which is crucial for statistical analysis, while Orange's support for regression analysis is rated lower at 8.1, indicating a potential gap for users needing advanced statistical tools.
Users report that while both products have similar ratings for meets requirements (8.3), GNU Octave's overall support quality (8.2) is rated higher than Orange's (6.9), suggesting that users may find better assistance when using GNU Octave.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Octave
No pricing available
Orange
No pricing available
Free Trial
GNU Octave
No trial information available
Orange
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
43
8.3
20
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.4
20
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.1
9
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.2
8
Quality of Support
8.2
39
6.9
14
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.