Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GNU Octave and Mathematica 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (45.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GNU Octave
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU OctaveMathematica
Star Rating
(86)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MathematicaSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Mathematica excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 8.5, while GNU Octave shines even brighter with a score of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for users focused on advanced modeling capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Mathematica's data visualization capabilities are rated at 8.9, which is impressive, but GNU Octave's overall ease of use, rated at 8.4, makes it more accessible for users who prioritize user-friendly interfaces.
- G2 users highlight that Mathematica's rendering tools score 8.8, providing high-quality outputs, whereas GNU Octave's rendering tools, rated at 8.2, may not meet the same level of quality, indicating a potential area for improvement.
- Users on G2 report that Mathematica's manufacturing process simulation is rated exceptionally high at 9.4, showcasing its robust capabilities in this area, while GNU Octave's score of 8.8 suggests it may not be as comprehensive for users needing detailed manufacturing simulations.
- Reviewers say that Mathematica's command clarity is rated at 8.6, which contributes to a smoother user experience, while GNU Octave's higher score of 9.0 indicates that users find its command structure more intuitive and easier to navigate.
- Users say that while both products support finite element analysis, Mathematica scores 8.1 and GNU Octave scores slightly higher at 8.3, suggesting that Octave may offer a more refined experience in this specific analytical area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Octave
No pricing availableMathematica
No pricing availableFree Trial
GNU Octave
No trial information availableMathematica
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
43
8.4
78
Ease of Use
8.4
43
7.3
80
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
39
7.9
76
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
41
8.1
79
Features by Category
Administration
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Capabilities
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
Methodology
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
9.5
10
8.5
8
8.3
11
8.1
9
8.2
10
8.7
10
8.2
10
8.8
8
Tools
8.5
11
8.8
8
8.3
11
8.1
8
8.2
10
7.9
8
Work
9.0
10
8.5
12
7.9
11
8.2
12
8.2
11
8.3
11
8.8
11
9.4
9
8.0
11
9.0
12
Environment
8.7
10
8.2
10
8.5
11
8.3
11
8.3
10
8.3
9
9.0
10
8.6
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNU Octave and Mathematica are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
GNU Octave is categorized as Statistical Analysis
Mathematica has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Octave
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Mathematica
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Research
11.3%
Computer Software
11.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Food Production
5.7%
Other
60.4%
Research
17.4%
Information Technology and Services
9.3%
Higher Education
8.1%
Computer Software
7.0%
Automotive
7.0%
Other
51.2%
Discussions
GNU Octave has no discussions with answers
Is Mathematica better than Matlab?
1 Comment
DS
no but in most of case is more useful
Read more
Mathematica has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
