Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare GNU Octave and Maple

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU Octave
Maple
Maple
Star Rating
(15)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Maple
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Maple excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a rating of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for those needing advanced visualization capabilities, while GNU Octave, although strong in other areas, does not offer comparable 3D modeling features.
  • Reviewers mention that Maple's data visualization capabilities are rated at 8.9, which is higher than GNU Octave's 8.0, indicating that users find Maple's visual representation of data to be more intuitive and effective for analysis.
  • G2 users highlight that Maple's quality control features score 8.4, providing robust tools for ensuring data integrity, whereas GNU Octave's offerings in this area are less comprehensive, leading to potential challenges in maintaining high-quality outputs.
  • Users on G2 report that Maple's collaboration tools are rated at 8.0, which facilitates teamwork and sharing of projects, while GNU Octave's collaboration features are not as developed, making it less suitable for team environments.
  • Reviewers mention that Maple's support quality is rated at 8.5, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas GNU Octave's support, rated at 8.2, is seen as adequate but not as robust.
  • Users say that Maple's ease of use is rated at 8.0, which some find slightly lower than GNU Octave's 8.4, suggesting that while GNU Octave may be easier for beginners, Maple offers more powerful features that may require a steeper learning curve.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Octave
No pricing available
Maple
No pricing available
Free Trial
GNU Octave
No trial information available
Maple
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
43
8.9
11
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.0
11
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
39
8.5
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
41
7.9
11
Features by Category
8.4
21
Not enough data
Administration
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
Capabilities
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
Methodology
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
Design
9.5
10
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Tools
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Work
9.0
10
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
Environment
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Maple
Maple
GNU Octave and Maple are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
GNU Octave
GNU Octave is categorized as Statistical Analysis
Maple
Maple has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
66.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
17.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
17.0%
Maple
Maple
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
21.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
35.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
42.9%
Reviewers' Industry
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Research
11.3%
Computer Software
11.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Food Production
5.7%
Other
60.4%
Maple
Maple
Higher Education
28.6%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Research
7.1%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
7.1%
Other
28.6%
Alternatives
GNU Octave
GNU Octave Alternatives
Scilab
Scilab
Add Scilab
MATLAB
MATLAB
Add MATLAB
Posit
Posit
Add Posit
Simulink
Simulink
Add Simulink
Maple
Maple Alternatives
MATLAB
MATLAB
Add MATLAB
Mathematica
Mathematica
Add Mathematica
SageMath
SageMath
Add SageMath
Scilab
Scilab
Add Scilab
Discussions
GNU Octave
GNU Octave Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
GNU Octave has no discussions with answers
Maple
Maple Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Maple has no discussions with answers