Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GNU Emacs and Neovim 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GNU Emacs
Star Rating
(83)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU EmacsNeovim
Star Rating
(11)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about NeovimSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that GNU Emacs excels in extensibility with a score of 9.5, allowing users to customize their environment extensively through Emacs Lisp, while Neovim, with a score of 9.2, also offers good extensibility but is slightly less flexible in this regard.
- Users report that Neovim shines in cross-platform support, scoring 9.6, making it a preferred choice for developers working across different operating systems, whereas GNU Emacs has a solid score of 9.0 but may not be as seamless in some environments.
- G2 users highlight that GNU Emacs provides superior syntax highlighting with a score of 9.0, which many find more visually appealing and functional compared to Neovim's score of 9.8, which, while still high, may not offer the same level of customization.
- Users on G2 say that the ease of setup is a significant differentiator, with Neovim scoring 7.3, making it easier for new users to get started, while GNU Emacs lags behind with a score of 5.5, often requiring more configuration and setup time.
- Reviewers mention that both products perform well in the find and replace functionality, with GNU Emacs scoring 9.0 and Neovim at 9.3, but Neovim's implementation is often noted for being faster and more intuitive.
- Users say that while both products have good support for collaborative editing, GNU Emacs scores lower at 6.0, indicating that users may find it less effective for team-based coding compared to other tools, whereas Neovim does not have a score for this feature, suggesting it may not be a focus area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Emacs
No pricing availableNeovim
No pricing availableFree Trial
GNU Emacs
No trial information availableNeovim
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.2
74
9.2
10
Ease of Use
6.1
75
6.3
10
Ease of Setup
5.5
17
7.3
5
Ease of Admin
6.8
16
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.9
59
7.8
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
72
10.0
10
Features by Category
Coding
9.0
7
9.8
10
8.8
7
8.3
10
9.0
7
9.3
10
8.6
7
8.3
9
Editing
Not enough data
6.0
8
9.0
7
8.9
9
8.8
7
8.8
10
Functionality
9.5
7
9.2
10
9.0
7
9.6
8
8.9
6
8.7
9
8.0
5
8.8
7
Agentic AI - Landing Page Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNU Emacs and Neovim are categorized as Text Editor
Unique Categories
GNU Emacs has no unique categories
Neovim has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Emacs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Neovim
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.3%
Information Technology and Services
18.1%
Research
7.2%
Internet
6.0%
Higher Education
6.0%
Other
31.3%
Computer Software
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Sports
9.1%
Logistics and Supply Chain
9.1%
Other
18.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
GNU Emacs has no discussions with answers
Neovim has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
