Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GNU Emacs and mousepad 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GNU Emacs
Star Rating
(83)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU Emacsmousepad
Star Rating
(11)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (54.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about mousepadSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GNU Emacs excels in extensibility with a score of 9.5, allowing for a highly customizable experience through its extensive library of plugins and integrations, while Mousepad, with a score of 6.1, lacks this level of flexibility.
- Reviewers mention that GNU Emacs offers superior syntax highlighting (9.0) and autocompletion (8.8), which enhances coding efficiency, whereas Mousepad's scores of 8.3 and 7.5 respectively indicate it may not provide the same level of support for developers.
- G2 users highlight that GNU Emacs supports a wide range of programming languages (9.0), making it a preferred choice for developers working in diverse environments, while Mousepad's language support score of 6.4 suggests limitations in this area.
- Users on G2 appreciate the powerful find and replace functionality in both products, with GNU Emacs scoring 9.0 and Mousepad slightly higher at 9.4, indicating that both tools are effective for this essential coding task.
- Reviewers mention that GNU Emacs has a steeper learning curve with an ease of use score of 6.1, while Mousepad shines in this area with a score of 9.8, making it more accessible for beginners or those looking for a straightforward text editor.
- Users say that GNU Emacs provides excellent cross-platform support (9.0), which is crucial for developers working across different operating systems, while Mousepad's score of 5.7 indicates it may not be as versatile in this regard.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Emacs
No pricing availablemousepad
No pricing availableFree Trial
GNU Emacs
No trial information availablemousepad
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.2
74
8.8
8
Ease of Use
6.1
75
9.8
8
Ease of Setup
5.5
17
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
6.8
16
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.9
59
7.6
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
72
8.5
8
Features by Category
Coding
9.0
7
8.3
6
8.8
7
7.5
6
9.0
7
9.4
6
8.6
7
8.3
6
Editing
Not enough data
6.9
6
9.0
7
6.4
6
8.8
7
8.3
6
Functionality
9.5
7
8.3
6
9.0
7
5.7
5
8.9
6
6.1
6
8.0
5
7.5
6
Agentic AI - Landing Page Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNU Emacs and mousepad are categorized as Text Editor
Unique Categories
GNU Emacs has no unique categories
mousepad has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Emacs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mousepad
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.3%
Information Technology and Services
18.1%
Research
7.2%
Internet
6.0%
Higher Education
6.0%
Other
31.3%
Computer Software
54.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Program Development
9.1%
Internet
9.1%
Education Management
9.1%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
GNU Emacs has no discussions with answers
mousepad has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
