Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare GNOME Terminal and Tabby.sh

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GNOME Terminal
GNOME Terminal
Star Rating
(14)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNOME Terminal
Tabby.sh
Tabby.sh
Star Rating
(16)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (62.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Tabby.sh
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that GNOME Terminal excels in resource usage with a score of 9.5, making it a lightweight option that runs smoothly even on older hardware, while Tabby.sh, although functional, does not match this efficiency.
  • Reviewers mention that GNOME Terminal's ease of use is rated at 9.2, with many users appreciating its straightforward interface and seamless integration with Linux environments, whereas Tabby.sh has a lower ease of use score of 8.3, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • G2 users highlight the superior quality of support for GNOME Terminal, scoring 9.5, with many praising the active community and extensive documentation, while Tabby.sh's support is rated at 7.3, leading to some frustration among users seeking help.
  • Users on G2 note that GNOME Terminal offers robust customization options with a score of 8.9, allowing users to tailor their terminal experience extensively, while Tabby.sh, although customizable, does not provide the same level of flexibility.
  • Reviewers say that GNOME Terminal's performance in terms of latency is impressive, scoring 9.3, which is crucial for users who rely on real-time command execution, while Tabby.sh's performance in this area is not as strong, leading to occasional delays.
  • Users report that GNOME Terminal's support for Linux is outstanding, with a score of 9.7, making it the preferred choice for Linux users, while Tabby.sh struggles with cross-platform support, particularly on Windows and Mac, both scoring only 5.7.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNOME Terminal
No pricing available
Tabby.sh
No pricing available
Free Trial
GNOME Terminal
No trial information available
Tabby.sh
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.7
12
9.0
5
Ease of Use
9.2
12
8.3
5
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.5
10
7.3
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
12
Not enough data
Features by Category
8.4
13
Not enough data
Performance
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
9.3
10
Not enough data
Operating System
9.7
10
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
User Interface
9.4
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
Licensing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNOME Terminal
GNOME Terminal
Tabby.sh
Tabby.sh
GNOME Terminal and Tabby.sh are categorized as Terminal Emulator
Unique Categories
GNOME Terminal
GNOME Terminal has no unique categories
Tabby.sh
Tabby.sh has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNOME Terminal
GNOME Terminal
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
75.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
8.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
16.7%
Tabby.sh
Tabby.sh
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
62.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
37.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
0%
Reviewers' Industry
GNOME Terminal
GNOME Terminal
Computer Software
33.3%
Computer & Network Security
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Research
8.3%
Religious Institutions
8.3%
Other
8.3%
Tabby.sh
Tabby.sh
Computer Software
37.5%
Information Technology and Services
31.3%
Wholesale
6.3%
Retail
6.3%
Logistics and Supply Chain
6.3%
Other
12.5%
Alternatives
GNOME Terminal
GNOME Terminal Alternatives
iTerm2
iTerm2
Add iTerm2
Alacritty
Alacritty
Add Alacritty
PuTTY
PuTTY
Add PuTTY
MobaXTerm
MobaXTerm
Add MobaXTerm
Tabby.sh
Tabby.sh Alternatives
iTerm2
iTerm2
Add iTerm2
PuTTY
PuTTY
Add PuTTY
MobaXTerm
MobaXTerm
Add MobaXTerm
SecureCRT
SecureCRT
Add SecureCRT
Discussions
GNOME Terminal
GNOME Terminal Discussions
What is gnome default terminal?
1 Comment
Mohammed T.
MT
GNOME-TerminalRead more
Monty the Mongoose crying
GNOME Terminal has no more discussions with answers
Tabby.sh
Tabby.sh Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Tabby.sh has no discussions with answers