Users report that SecureCRT excels in Windows support with a score of 9.9, while GNOME Terminal struggles significantly with a score of 5.7, making SecureCRT a better choice for users primarily on Windows systems.
Reviewers mention that GNOME Terminal shines in Linux support, scoring 9.7, compared to SecureCRT's 8.9, indicating that GNOME Terminal is more tailored for Linux environments.
Users say that SecureCRT offers superior logging capabilities with a score of 9.7, while GNOME Terminal's logging features are rated lower at 8.8, highlighting SecureCRT's strength in maintaining detailed session logs.
Reviewers mention that SecureCRT's customization options are robust, scoring 9.3, whereas GNOME Terminal's customization features are rated at 8.9, suggesting that users looking for a highly customizable interface may prefer SecureCRT.
G2 users report that SecureCRT has a higher overall quality of support with a score of 9.2, compared to GNOME Terminal's 9.5, indicating that while both have strong support, GNOME Terminal may have a slight edge in this area.
Users on G2 highlight that SecureCRT's performance in terms of resource usage is rated at 9.1, while GNOME Terminal scores higher at 9.5, suggesting that GNOME Terminal may be more efficient in resource management during operation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNOME Terminal
No pricing available
SecureCRT
No pricing available
Free Trial
GNOME Terminal
No trial information available
SecureCRT
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.7
12
9.4
52
Ease of Use
9.2
12
9.4
52
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.7
11
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.8
9
Quality of Support
9.5
10
9.2
39
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.