Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Global App Testing and Tricentis Testim 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Transifex
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$
No pricing available
Global App Testing
Star Rating
(56)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$
Browse all 3 pricing plansTricentis Testim
Star Rating
(50)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Tricentis TestimSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Tricentis Testim excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, making it highly accessible for teams new to automated testing. In contrast, Global App Testing, with a score of 8.7, is noted for being slightly more complex, which may require additional training for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis Testim's ease of setup is outstanding, scoring 9.6, which allows teams to get started quickly. Global App Testing, scoring 8.7, has been noted to have a more involved setup process, potentially leading to delays in implementation.
- G2 users highlight that Tricentis Testim has a strong quality of support, scoring 9.2, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Global App Testing, while still good at 9.0, has received some feedback indicating that response times can vary.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis Testim has a positive product direction score of 9.4, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates. In comparison, Global App Testing's score of 8.7 suggests that while they are also focused on development, users feel there is room for more innovation.
- Users on G2 report that Tricentis Testim meets requirements effectively with a score of 8.9, particularly highlighting features like the AI-driven test creation. Global App Testing, with a score of 8.6, is recognized for its comprehensive testing coverage but may lack some advanced automation features that users desire.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis Testim is a strong partner in business with a score of 8.9, reflecting a collaborative approach to customer feedback. In contrast, Global App Testing, scoring 9.4 in this area, is praised for its proactive engagement and partnership with clients, indicating a slightly more customer-centric approach.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Global App Testing
Base
$
Full end-to-end functional testing for engineering and QA teams
- Test execution at speed (via a crowd)
- Test management
- Bugs reports/analysis
Tricentis Testim
No pricing availableFree Trial
Global App Testing
Free Trial is available
Tricentis Testim
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
48
8.9
38
Ease of Use
8.7
47
9.3
40
Ease of Setup
8.7
36
9.6
12
Ease of Admin
9.4
14
9.0
12
Quality of Support
9.0
48
9.2
39
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
17
8.9
12
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
44
9.4
40
Features by Category
User Response Methods
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Participant Selection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Insights
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
Admin
8.2
15
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
Management
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.8
7
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
Translation Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visitor Customization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Translation Options
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Offering Type
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Machine Translation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Translation Memory
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Machine Translation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Translation Options
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.0
25
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.4
25
Not enough data
Management
8.8
25
Not enough data
7.3
23
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Automation
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
6.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Global App Testing and Tricentis Testim are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Global App Testing is categorized as Crowd Testing Tools, User Research, Computer-Assisted Translation, Machine Translation, Mobile App Testing, Website Translation Tools, and Test Management
Tricentis Testim is categorized as Automation Testing and AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Global App Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tricentis Testim
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
10.0%
Information Technology and Services
8.0%
Financial Services
6.0%
Retail
4.0%
Music
4.0%
Other
68.0%
Computer Software
44.7%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.5%
Internet
6.4%
Program Development
4.3%
Other
23.4%
Discussions
Global App Testing has no discussions with answers
Tricentis Testim has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
