Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and StackHawk 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$39.00 1 Code Contributor Per Month
GitLab
Star Rating
(860)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabStackHawk
Star Rating
(68)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$39.00 1 Code Contributor Per Month
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitLab excels in its API / Integrations with a score of 9.4, allowing seamless connectivity with various tools, while StackHawk, with a score of 9.2, also offers strong integration capabilities but lacks some of the extensive options GitLab provides.
- Reviewers mention that StackHawk shines in Quality of Support, scoring 9.3 compared to GitLab's 8.5, indicating that users find StackHawk's customer service more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
- G2 users highlight GitLab's superior Reporting and Analytics features, scoring 9.4, which provide comprehensive insights into project performance, whereas StackHawk's score of 8.3 suggests it may not offer the same depth of analytics.
- Users on G2 report that StackHawk has a better False Positives rate, scoring 9.2, which indicates a more reliable detection system compared to GitLab's score of 7.6, leading to less noise in security alerts.
- Reviewers say that GitLab's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, which is slightly lower than StackHawk's 9.1, suggesting that users find StackHawk's interface more intuitive and user-friendly for everyday tasks.
- Users report that GitLab's Deployment Automation features are robust, scoring 9.0, which facilitates smoother CI/CD processes, while StackHawk, with a score of 8.8, offers solid automation but may not match GitLab's comprehensive deployment capabilities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableStackHawk
Secure
$39.00
1 Code Contributor Per Month
Shift-Left DAST & API Security Testing that runs directly in CI/CD to enable developers to fix critical application and API security vulnerabilities.
- Unlimited scans and environments
- Unlimited applications
- Docker based application security scanner
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
StackHawk
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
650
8.8
53
Ease of Use
8.7
652
9.0
53
Ease of Setup
8.6
213
8.4
33
Ease of Admin
8.6
170
8.8
28
Quality of Support
8.5
514
9.3
49
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
145
9.1
25
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
617
9.4
42
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.9
130
Not enough data
8.6
122
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.5
114
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
131
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
8.7
120
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
9.3
12
Analysis
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
9.3
10
Testing
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Administration
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Analysis
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.9
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Testing
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
24
8.8
29
8.8
23
8.5
28
Analysis
8.4
23
8.2
32
9.1
23
8.4
28
8.8
23
Feature Not Available
8.8
23
9.0
31
8.9
23
Feature Not Available
Testing
8.6
22
7.3
29
9.1
22
8.8
31
8.9
21
7.9
29
9.0
20
8.3
28
8.9
19
8.1
31
9.1
20
7.3
31
Administration
8.7
76
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.8
79
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
78
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
9.0
78
Not enough data
8.6
72
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.8
73
Not enough data
8.6
70
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
7.7
23
Not enough data
8.7
26
Network
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Application
Not enough data
8.2
22
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
19
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.7
197
Not enough data
8.3
190
Not enough data
8.9
204
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
138
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.7
66
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
60
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
7.9
12
Not enough data
8.2
10
Security Testing
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.9
12
Security Management
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
7.3
10
Management
8.7
140
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
137
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
9.0
152
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
223
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
208
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
202
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.8
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
195
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Not enough data
Security
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
Value Management
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and StackHawk are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
StackHawk
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.8%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Computer Software
18.2%
Computer & Network Security
9.1%
Financial Services
4.5%
Banking
4.5%
Other
40.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
StackHawk has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
