Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (48.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$5,000 per year
GitLab
Star Rating
(860)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Star Rating
(373)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$5,000 per year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviews say that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in Configuration Management with a score of 9.0, as users appreciate its ability to automate complex IT tasks seamlessly. In contrast, GitLab scores 8.7, with users noting that while it offers configuration management features, they are not as robust as those in Ansible.
- Users report that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform shines in Deployment Automation with a score of 9.3, highlighting its effectiveness in streamlining deployment processes. GitLab, with a score of 9.0, is also strong but users mention that its deployment features are more integrated with CI/CD pipelines rather than standalone automation.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have similar scores in Ease of Use (8.7), but users on G2 indicate that GitLab's interface is more intuitive for new users, making it easier to navigate through its features compared to Ansible's more technical interface.
- Users say that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has a slight edge in Quality of Support with a score of 8.3, as many reviewers appreciate the dedicated support from Red Hat. GitLab, scoring 8.5, also receives positive feedback, but some users report longer response times during peak hours.
- G2 users highlight that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is superior in Product Direction with a score of 9.4, indicating a strong commitment to evolving its features based on user feedback. GitLab, with a score of 8.7, is seen as responsive but less proactive in its updates.
- Users report that GitLab excels in Pipelines with a score of 9.1, as many find its CI/CD capabilities to be highly effective and user-friendly. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform scores 8.6, with users mentioning that while it supports pipelines, it is not as integrated as GitLab's offerings.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Basic Tower
$5,000
per year
Up to 100 nodes
- 30 Days of Support only
- No response time SLA
- Maintenance & Upgrades
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
650
9.0
154
Ease of Use
8.7
652
8.7
318
Ease of Setup
8.6
213
8.2
246
Ease of Admin
8.6
170
8.8
90
Quality of Support
8.5
514
8.3
126
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
145
8.8
74
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
617
9.4
155
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
122
9.0
23
8.9
130
8.5
23
8.6
122
8.4
21
Functionality
9.0
128
9.3
24
8.5
114
8.6
20
8.5
109
8.3
21
8.7
114
8.6
24
8.6
103
8.2
19
Processes
9.1
131
8.6
22
9.0
120
8.7
22
8.7
120
8.3
20
Configuration
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Agentic AI - Network Automation Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.0
5
Logistics
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Security - Network Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
6.7
5
Administration
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Analysis
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.9
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Testing
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
22
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
76
8.7
30
8.7
77
Feature Not Available
8.7
74
8.6
30
8.8
79
8.9
29
Automation
8.9
78
9.2
30
8.4
71
9.0
29
9.0
78
9.3
27
8.6
72
9.0
31
IT Management
8.7
73
9.0
32
8.8
73
9.1
31
8.6
70
8.5
28
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
210
9.1
16
9.0
212
8.9
17
8.7
204
8.9
16
Management
8.7
197
9.1
15
8.3
190
8.2
16
8.9
204
9.6
16
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
138
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.7
66
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
60
Not enough data
Data Preparation
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Analysis
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visualization
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Log Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.7
140
9.0
12
8.8
145
8.0
11
8.5
133
7.9
11
Functionality
8.8
145
8.9
11
8.8
145
8.2
10
8.7
137
8.7
10
Processes
9.0
149
8.3
11
8.5
138
7.5
10
9.0
152
8.3
11
Functionality
8.9
223
|
Verified
8.3
5
8.6
208
|
Verified
8.3
5
8.4
202
|
Verified
8.3
5
Management
8.8
210
|
Verified
8.3
5
8.7
213
|
Verified
8.0
5
8.4
195
|
Verified
8.7
5
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Not enough data
Security
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation Support - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Error Management - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance and Reporting - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
5.6
13
Platform
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.3
13
Not enough data
6.5
12
Not enough data
6.9
12
Security
Not enough data
6.0
12
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
6.8
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.3
12
Agentic AI - Enterprise IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
Value Management
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform are categorized as DevOps Platforms, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Application Release Orchestration, Continuous Delivery, and Continuous Integration
Unique Categories
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is categorized as Network Automation Tools, Patch Management, Vulnerability Scanner, Log Analysis, Enterprise IT Management, Configuration Management, Build Automation, and Runbook Automation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.8%
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Financial Services
10.7%
Computer Software
9.0%
Telecommunications
8.2%
Banking
6.3%
Other
50.0%
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
What is Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform used for?
1 Comment
AJ
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations by automating configuration management, application deployment, and task automation. It excels...Read more
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
