Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and Progress Telerik Fiddler 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (40.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free 1 community license
GitLab
Star Rating
(860)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabProgress Telerik Fiddler
Star Rating
(166)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 1 community license
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitLab excels in its API / Integrations with a score of 9.2, allowing for seamless connectivity with various tools, while Progress Telerik Fiddler, with a score of 8.9, offers solid integrations but lacks the extensive API capabilities that GitLab provides.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's Deployment Automation feature shines with a score of 9.0, enabling efficient and automated deployment processes, whereas Progress Telerik Fiddler, while effective, scores slightly lower at 8.8, indicating room for improvement in automation capabilities.
- G2 users highlight GitLab's superior Task Management functionality, scoring 8.8, which allows teams to effectively manage and track tasks within the platform, compared to Progress Telerik Fiddler's score of 8.5, which, while competent, does not offer the same level of task oversight.
- Users on G2 report that GitLab's Quality of Support is rated at 8.5, indicating a strong support system, while Progress Telerik Fiddler's support is rated lower at 7.9, suggesting that users may experience challenges in getting timely assistance.
- Reviewers say that GitLab's Extensibility is a standout feature with a score of 9.0, allowing users to customize and extend the platform to fit their needs, while Progress Telerik Fiddler, with a score of 8.6, offers extensibility but may not meet the same level of customization that GitLab provides.
- Users report that GitLab's Reporting and Analytics capabilities are highly rated at 8.8, providing comprehensive insights into project performance, whereas Progress Telerik Fiddler, scoring 8.3, offers analytics but lacks the depth and breadth of reporting features found in GitLab.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableProgress Telerik Fiddler
Fiddler Classic
Free
1 community license
The community-trusted free Windows-only tool that logs HTTP(s) network traffic.
- Windows-only
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
650
8.8
145
Ease of Use
8.7
652
8.1
144
Ease of Setup
8.6
213
8.9
29
Ease of Admin
8.6
170
8.5
28
Quality of Support
8.5
514
7.9
92
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
145
8.9
25
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
617
8.0
141
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.9
130
Not enough data
8.6
122
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.5
114
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
131
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
8.7
120
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Analysis
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.9
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Testing
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
22
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
76
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.8
79
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
78
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
9.0
78
Not enough data
8.6
72
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.8
73
Not enough data
8.6
70
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.7
197
Not enough data
8.3
190
Not enough data
8.9
204
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
138
8.4
22
8.5
132
8.3
20
8.6
139
8.2
19
Bug Monitoring
8.4
135
8.6
18
8.8
144
8.3
19
8.8
134
7.9
19
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.7
66
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
60
Not enough data
Management
8.7
140
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
137
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
9.0
152
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
223
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
208
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
202
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.8
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
195
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Not enough data
Security
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
Value Management
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and Progress Telerik Fiddler are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Progress Telerik Fiddler has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Progress Telerik Fiddler
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.8%
Computer Software
30.2%
Information Technology and Services
23.3%
Program Development
3.8%
Financial Services
3.8%
Telecommunications
3.1%
Other
35.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Progress Telerik Fiddler has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
