Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and OpenText Core Application Security 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GitLab
Star Rating
(860)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabOpenText Core Application Security
Star Rating
(34)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Core Application SecuritySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText Fortify On Demand excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.1, indicating a strong capability in identifying vulnerabilities early in the development process. In contrast, GitLab also performs well in this area with a score of 8.8, but users mention that its focus is more on integration and collaboration rather than deep security analysis.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab shines in Test Automation, achieving a score of 9.1, which allows teams to streamline their testing processes effectively. OpenText Fortify On Demand, while competent, scores slightly lower at 9.0, with users noting that its automation features are more focused on security testing rather than general test automation.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText Fortify On Demand offers superior Vulnerability Scanning capabilities, scoring 8.8, which is crucial for organizations prioritizing security. GitLab, while also effective, scores the same in this area but users report that its scanning features are more integrated into the CI/CD pipeline, making it less focused on standalone security assessments.
- Users on G2 report that GitLab's Workflow Visualization features, scoring 8.5, provide a more intuitive interface for managing development processes compared to OpenText Fortify On Demand, which scores 8.7. Reviewers mention that GitLab's visual tools help teams better understand their workflows and improve collaboration.
- Reviewers say that OpenText Fortify On Demand's Quality of Support is rated at 8.0, which some users find lacking compared to GitLab's 8.5. Users report that GitLab's support is more responsive and helpful, particularly for troubleshooting integration issues.
- Users report that OpenText Fortify On Demand has a strong focus on Compliance Testing, scoring 8.8, which is essential for enterprises needing to meet regulatory standards. GitLab, while also effective in compliance, scores slightly higher at 9.0, with reviewers mentioning its flexibility in adapting to various compliance frameworks.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableOpenText Core Application Security
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
OpenText Core Application Security
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
650
8.1
31
Ease of Use
8.7
652
8.2
31
Ease of Setup
8.6
213
8.2
12
Ease of Admin
8.6
170
8.9
12
Quality of Support
8.5
514
7.9
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
145
9.0
12
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
617
8.8
30
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.9
130
Not enough data
8.6
122
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.5
114
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
131
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
8.7
120
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Analysis
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.9
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Testing
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
22
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
76
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.8
79
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
78
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
9.0
78
Not enough data
8.6
72
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.8
73
Not enough data
8.6
70
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.7
197
Not enough data
8.3
190
Not enough data
8.9
204
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
138
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.7
66
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
60
Not enough data
Management
8.7
140
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
137
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
9.0
152
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
223
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
208
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
202
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.8
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
195
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Not enough data
Security
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) ToolsHide 4 FeaturesShow 4 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Threat Detection & Response - Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
Value Management
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and OpenText Core Application Security are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
OpenText Core Application Security is categorized as Static Code Analysis, Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST), and Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Core Application Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.8%
Information Technology and Services
26.5%
Computer Software
8.8%
Computer & Network Security
8.8%
Construction
5.9%
Airlines/Aviation
5.9%
Other
44.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
OpenText Core Application Security has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
