Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and Mend.io 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GitLab
Star Rating
(861)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabMend.io
Star Rating
(112)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Mend.ioSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Mend.io excels in its Secrets Management feature, scoring 8.3, which reviewers mention provides robust protection for sensitive information. In contrast, GitLab's Secrets Management scored slightly lower at 8.0, indicating a potential area for improvement.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab shines in API / Integrations, achieving a score of 9.2, which users on G2 highlight as a key strength for seamless connectivity with other tools. Mend.io, while still competent, scored 7.8 in this area, suggesting it may not offer as extensive integration options.
- Users say that GitLab's Static Code Analysis feature is particularly strong, with a score of 9.1, which reviewers appreciate for its thoroughness in identifying vulnerabilities. Mend.io, on the other hand, scored 8.2, indicating it may not be as effective in this critical area.
- G2 users report that Mend.io's Configuration Management received a solid score of 8.8, with reviewers mentioning its user-friendly interface. GitLab's Configuration Management, however, scored slightly lower at 8.0, suggesting that users may find Mend.io easier to navigate in this aspect.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's Test Automation feature is a standout, scoring 9.0, which users say significantly enhances their development workflow. Mend.io's Test Automation scored lower at 7.3, indicating it may not provide the same level of efficiency.
- Users on G2 report that GitLab's Issue Tracking feature is highly effective, with a score of 9.0, which reviewers appreciate for its comprehensive tracking capabilities. Mend.io, with a score of 7.7, may not offer the same depth in managing issues, making GitLab a more favorable choice for teams focused on tracking and resolving bugs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableMend.io
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Mend.io
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
650
8.6
81
Ease of Use
8.7
652
8.3
82
Ease of Setup
8.6
213
8.1
50
Ease of Admin
8.6
170
8.2
50
Quality of Support
8.5
514
8.7
67
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
145
8.8
46
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
617
8.6
75
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.9
130
Not enough data
8.6
122
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.5
114
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
131
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
8.7
120
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
27
7.6
7
9.0
26
7.7
8
Analysis
8.6
25
7.3
11
8.9
26
7.6
11
9.1
26
8.2
11
8.8
24
7.6
11
Testing
8.8
26
7.2
10
8.7
25
Feature Not Available
9.1
25
7.2
9
8.8
25
7.7
10
8.8
23
Feature Not Available
8.4
23
7.4
9
8.7
23
5.0
9
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
22
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.0
10
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Protection
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Administration
8.7
76
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.8
79
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
78
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
9.0
78
Not enough data
8.6
72
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.8
73
Not enough data
8.6
70
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.7
197
Not enough data
8.3
190
Not enough data
8.9
204
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
138
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
64
8.5
45
8.8
69
8.5
47
8.7
66
8.6
44
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
63
8.2
45
8.9
63
8.8
44
8.9
60
8.6
45
Management
8.7
140
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
137
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
9.0
152
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
223
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
208
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
202
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.8
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
195
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Not enough data
Security
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
Value Management
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and Mend.io are categorized as Software Composition Analysis and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Mend.io is categorized as Container Security and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Mend.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.8%
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Financial Services
6.7%
Telecommunications
4.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.8%
Other
36.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
What is a contributing developer?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
“Contributing Developer” means any employee or contractor who at any point (1) accesses or uses the WhiteSource product; (2) develops the code to be scanned...Read more
Do you offer an on-premise option?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource is a cloud-based service, but we also offer an on-premise option, if necessary. It’s important to emphasize that we do not scan your code. We...Read more
Why are you pricing per contributing developers?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource automates and manages open source components throughout the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Therefore, pricing based on the number of...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
