Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and JFrog 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (51.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
GitLab
Star Rating
(864)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabJFrog
Star Rating
(105)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitLab excels in API / Integrations with a score of 9.2, making it easier to connect with other tools and services, while JFrog's score of 8.8 indicates it still offers solid integration capabilities but may not be as robust.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's Configuration Management feature is highly rated at 8.7, providing users with effective tools for managing their configurations, whereas JFrog's lower score of 7.3 suggests it may lack some advanced features in this area.
- G2 users highlight GitLab's superior Deployment Automation capabilities, scoring 9.0, which allows for seamless deployment processes, while JFrog's score of 8.3 indicates it may not be as efficient in automating deployments.
- Users on G2 say that GitLab's Task Management feature, rated at 8.8, offers a user-friendly interface for tracking tasks, while JFrog's score of 8.3 suggests it may not provide the same level of ease and functionality.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's Vulnerability Checks are highly effective, contributing to its overall security posture, while JFrog's performance in this area, although solid, does not match the same level of user satisfaction.
- Users report that GitLab's Reporting and Analytics features, with a score of 8.8, provide comprehensive insights into project performance, while JFrog's score of 8.3 indicates it may not deliver the same depth of analytics.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableJFrog
PRO
Starting at $150.00
Per Month
Automated Artifact and Container Registry for Individuals & Small teams
- Universal Binary Repository
- Release Lifecycle Management
- Unlimited Docker Hub Pulls
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
JFrog
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
654
8.5
77
Ease of Use
8.7
656
8.2
78
Ease of Setup
8.6
217
8.2
46
Ease of Admin
8.6
172
8.5
39
Quality of Support
8.5
518
8.4
67
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
147
8.5
38
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
621
8.5
71
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
123
7.1
8
8.9
131
6.9
8
8.6
123
7.7
8
Functionality
9.0
129
7.5
8
8.5
115
7.5
8
8.5
109
8.1
9
8.7
114
8.5
9
8.6
103
Feature Not Available
Processes
9.1
132
8.5
9
9.0
121
7.4
9
8.7
121
7.3
8
Administration
9.2
28
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
8.9
25
Not enough data
Testing
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
25
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
Analysis
8.5
24
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
21
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
77
8.7
5
8.7
78
8.7
5
8.7
75
9.0
5
8.8
80
9.3
5
Automation
8.9
79
Not enough data
8.4
72
Feature Not Available
9.0
79
8.7
5
8.7
73
Feature Not Available
IT Management
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.9
74
7.7
5
8.6
71
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
213
8.0
9
9.0
215
8.1
9
8.7
205
8.7
10
Management
8.8
199
8.3
10
8.4
191
7.4
9
8.9
207
8.2
10
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
6.7
7
Not enough data
6.5
8
Not enough data
6.0
7
Not enough data
5.8
6
Management
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
6.9
7
Not enough data
4.0
5
Not enough data
6.2
7
Bug Reporting
8.6
139
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
8.6
140
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
136
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
135
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.8
70
Not enough data
8.7
67
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
64
Not enough data
9.0
61
Not enough data
Management
8.8
142
6.5
10
8.8
147
7.5
10
8.5
135
7.3
10
Functionality
8.8
148
6.1
9
8.8
148
7.0
10
8.7
139
6.0
10
Processes
9.0
152
8.3
9
8.5
140
7.0
10
9.0
155
8.2
10
Functionality
8.9
226
|
Verified
8.2
10
8.6
210
|
Verified
8.2
10
8.4
204
|
Verified
7.8
9
Management
8.9
214
|
Verified
7.7
10
8.7
215
|
Verified
7.8
10
8.4
197
|
Verified
6.7
9
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.6
13
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
116
Not enough data
8.6
112
Not enough data
8.4
112
Not enough data
Security
8.0
101
Not enough data
8.4
100
Not enough data
9.0
109
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
39
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.9
37
Not enough data
Value Management
9.0
39
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.9
40
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and JFrog are categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Continuous Delivery, and Continuous Integration
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, Value Stream Management, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Peer Code Review, Bug Tracking, and AI Code Generation
JFrog is categorized as Repository Management, MLOps Platforms, Container Registry, and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
JFrog
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.6%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
32.7%
Information Technology and Services
32.0%
Computer Software
14.0%
Financial Services
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
6.0%
Internet
3.0%
Other
37.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
JFrog has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
