Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare GitLab and Indusface WAS

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GitLab
GitLab
Star Rating
(870)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLab
Indusface WAS
Indusface WAS
Star Rating
(67)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (49.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$59.00
Browse all 3 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that GitLab excels in providing an integrated platform for development, combining source control, CI pipelines, security scanning, and deployment automation. Users appreciate how this all-in-one approach reduces the need for multiple tools, making daily development smoother and more efficient.
  • Users say that Indusface WAS stands out for its robust vulnerability detection capabilities, identifying not only application vulnerabilities but also OS-level issues and malware. Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of its automated scans and the supportive nature of the team, which enhances the overall user experience.
  • Reviewers mention that GitLab's user interface is particularly intuitive, making tasks like code searching and managing pipelines straightforward. This ease of use is a significant advantage for teams looking to streamline their workflows without a steep learning curve.
  • According to verified reviews, Indusface WAS receives high marks for its quality of support, with users noting the team's responsiveness and helpful guidance during audits. This level of support can be crucial for organizations that require assistance in navigating security compliance.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that while GitLab has a higher overall satisfaction score, Indusface WAS has a slightly better star rating, indicating that users feel very positively about its specific features, particularly in vulnerability management and reporting.
  • Users report that GitLab's implementation process is quick and efficient, with many praising the intuitive onboarding wizard that helps new users get started without hassle. In contrast, Indusface WAS, while effective, may not have the same level of streamlined onboarding, which could impact new users' initial experiences.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing available
Indusface WAS
Advance Plan
$59.00
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Indusface WAS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
658
9.1
52
Ease of Use
8.7
661
9.0
50
Ease of Setup
8.6
222
9.0
35
Ease of Admin
8.6
172
8.9
28
Quality of Support
8.5
522
9.4
48
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
147
9.4
26
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
625
8.8
48
Features by Category
Application Release OrchestrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.7
144
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
124
Not enough data
8.9
131
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
130
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
133
Not enough data
9.0
122
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.1
36
Administration
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.7
30
Not enough data
9.1
32
Analysis
Not enough data
9.3
29
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
9.3
32
Testing
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.7
26
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
9.2
27
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
8.9
31
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
28
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.0
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
8.9
25
Not enough data
Testing
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
9.0
27
9.2
19
Administration
9.2
25
Feature Not Available
8.9
24
Feature Not Available
Analysis
8.5
24
9.4
16
9.2
24
9.4
16
8.8
24
Feature Not Available
8.9
24
9.3
17
9.0
24
Feature Not Available
Testing
8.6
23
9.4
15
9.1
23
9.4
14
8.9
22
9.4
13
9.0
21
9.3
14
9.0
20
9.4
15
9.1
21
8.1
15
Cloud Infrastructure AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.8
90
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.7
75
Not enough data
8.8
80
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
79
Not enough data
8.4
72
Not enough data
9.0
79
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
8.6
71
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.9
36
Performance
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
7.9
29
Not enough data
9.3
31
Network
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.8
24
Application
Not enough data
9.3
27
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
26
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
237
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
214
Not enough data
9.0
216
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.8
201
Not enough data
8.4
192
Not enough data
8.9
207
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
8.5
166
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
139
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
8.6
140
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
136
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
135
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
8.9
76
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.8
71
Not enough data
8.7
67
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
64
Not enough data
9.0
61
Not enough data
8.8
169
Not enough data
Management
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
148
Not enough data
8.5
136
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
151
Not enough data
8.8
149
Not enough data
8.6
141
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
155
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
8.9
156
Not enough data
Continuous IntegrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.1
243
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
225
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
204
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.9
214
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
215
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
198
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.6
12
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
117
Not enough data
8.6
112
Not enough data
8.4
112
Not enough data
Security
8.0
101
Not enough data
8.4
101
Not enough data
9.0
110
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Stream ManagementHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
8.8
48
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
39
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.9
37
Not enough data
Value Management
9.0
39
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.9
40
Not enough data
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
37.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
26.4%
Indusface WAS
Indusface WAS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
49.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
38.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
12.7%
Reviewers' Industry
GitLab
GitLab
Computer Software
33.4%
Information Technology and Services
24.2%
Internet
4.0%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
32.7%
Indusface WAS
Indusface WAS
Computer Software
27.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Financial Services
9.5%
Computer & Network Security
6.3%
Telecommunications
3.2%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
GitLab
GitLab Alternatives
GitHub
GitHub
Add GitHub
CloudBees
CloudBees
Add CloudBees
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
Indusface WAS
Indusface WAS Alternatives
Wiz
Wiz
Add Wiz
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
Add Tenable Nessus
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
Discussions
GitLab
GitLab Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
Pankaj G.
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
Roke B.
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Why does GitLab Server goes down?
2 Comments
Roke B.
RB
That is different for each outage.Read more
Indusface WAS
Indusface WAS Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Indusface WAS has no discussions with answers