Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and Indusface WAS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (49.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$59.00
GitLab
Star Rating
(858)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabIndusface WAS
Star Rating
(67)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (49.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$59.00
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitLab excels in its issue tracking capabilities, scoring a 9.1, which reviewers mention allows for efficient management of tasks and bugs. In contrast, Indusface WAS also performs well with a score of 9.2, but users note that its focus is more on security vulnerabilities rather than general issue tracking.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's test automation feature is robust, achieving a score of 9.0, which users appreciate for streamlining their CI/CD processes. Indusface WAS matches this score but users report that its automation is more tailored towards security testing, which may not be as beneficial for general software development needs.
- G2 users highlight GitLab's ease of use with a score of 8.7, stating that the interface is intuitive and user-friendly. In comparison, Indusface WAS scores slightly higher at 8.9, with reviewers mentioning that its dashboard and visualizations are particularly helpful for monitoring security metrics.
- Users on G2 report that GitLab's API integrations are highly rated at 9.2, allowing for seamless connectivity with other tools. Indusface WAS also scores well at 9.0, but reviewers mention that its integrations are primarily focused on security tools, which may limit flexibility for broader software development integrations.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's quality of support is commendable, scoring 8.5, with many users appreciating the responsiveness of the support team. In contrast, Indusface WAS shines in this area with a score of 9.3, where users report exceptional support tailored to security-related queries.
- Users say that GitLab's deployment automation feature is effective, scoring 9.0, which reviewers appreciate for its ability to streamline releases. Indusface WAS, while also scoring well in this area, focuses more on security compliance during deployment, which some users find less relevant for general software deployment needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableIndusface WAS
Advance Plan
$59.00
- AcuRisQ - Get a List of Prioritised Vulnerabilities that Pose the Highest Business Risk
- Managed Application Security Scanning
- Scan Behind Authentication Page
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
Indusface WAS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
649
9.1
52
Ease of Use
8.7
651
9.0
50
Ease of Setup
8.6
212
9.0
35
Ease of Admin
8.6
170
8.9
28
Quality of Support
8.5
514
9.4
48
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
145
9.4
26
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
616
8.8
48
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.9
130
Not enough data
8.6
122
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.5
114
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
131
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
8.7
120
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.7
30
Not enough data
9.1
32
Analysis
Not enough data
9.3
29
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
9.3
32
Testing
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.7
26
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
9.2
27
Administration
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.0
26
Not enough data
Analysis
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.9
26
Not enough data
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
Testing
8.8
26
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
24
Feature Not Available
8.8
23
Feature Not Available
Analysis
8.4
23
9.4
16
9.1
23
9.4
16
8.8
23
Feature Not Available
8.8
23
9.3
17
8.9
23
Feature Not Available
Testing
8.6
22
9.4
15
9.1
22
9.4
14
8.9
21
9.4
13
9.0
20
9.3
14
8.9
19
9.4
15
9.1
20
8.1
15
Administration
8.7
76
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.8
79
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
78
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
9.0
78
Not enough data
8.6
72
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.8
73
Not enough data
8.6
70
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
7.9
29
Not enough data
9.3
31
Network
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.8
24
Application
Not enough data
9.3
27
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
26
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.0
211
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.7
197
Not enough data
8.3
190
Not enough data
8.9
204
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
138
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.7
66
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
60
Not enough data
Management
8.7
140
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
137
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
9.0
152
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
222
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
208
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
202
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.8
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
195
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Not enough data
Security
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
Value Management
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and Indusface WAS are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Indusface WAS is categorized as Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Scanner
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Indusface WAS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.7%
Computer Software
27.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Financial Services
9.5%
Computer & Network Security
6.3%
Telecommunications
3.2%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Indusface WAS has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
