Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitLab and HCL AppScan 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
GitLab
Star Rating
(860)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabHCL AppScan
Star Rating
(76)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that HCL AppScan excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 8.3, while GitLab shines with a higher score of 8.8, indicating that GitLab provides more comprehensive insights into code vulnerabilities.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's Test Automation feature is particularly strong, scoring 9.1, compared to HCL AppScan's score of 8.4, suggesting that GitLab offers more robust automation capabilities for testing processes.
- G2 users highlight that HCL AppScan's Vulnerability Scan feature scores 8.5, which is on par with GitLab's 8.8, but users report that GitLab's scanning is perceived as more thorough and user-friendly.
- Reviewers say that GitLab's Issue Tracking functionality is superior, with a score of 9.2, compared to HCL AppScan's 7.8, indicating that GitLab provides a more effective way to manage and resolve issues.
- Users on G2 report that HCL AppScan's Configuration Management feature scores 8.8, which is competitive, but GitLab's overall management capabilities, including Processes and Workflow scoring 8.7, are seen as more integrated and user-friendly.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have strong Documentation support, GitLab's community and update schedule are rated higher, making it easier for users to find help and stay updated on new features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableHCL AppScan
HCL AppScan CodeSweep
Free
Free-to-use security tool for developers alike who need to "spell check" and fix their code, as they write it, in multiple IDEs.
- Ideal for Developers
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
HCL AppScan
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
650
8.8
59
Ease of Use
8.7
652
8.5
62
Ease of Setup
8.6
213
8.5
31
Ease of Admin
8.6
170
8.7
31
Quality of Support
8.5
514
8.5
60
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
145
8.8
30
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
617
8.4
58
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.9
130
Not enough data
8.6
122
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.5
114
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
131
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
8.7
120
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
27
8.2
21
9.0
26
8.5
21
Analysis
8.6
25
8.6
22
8.9
26
7.8
22
9.1
26
8.3
22
8.8
24
8.0
22
Testing
8.8
26
7.6
21
8.7
25
7.8
21
9.1
25
8.4
20
8.8
25
7.9
21
8.8
23
8.3
20
8.4
23
8.3
21
8.7
23
7.5
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
24
8.1
26
8.8
23
8.2
28
Analysis
8.4
23
8.5
29
9.1
23
8.0
27
8.8
23
8.2
28
8.8
23
8.5
27
8.9
23
8.3
27
Testing
8.6
22
7.7
28
9.1
22
7.9
24
8.9
21
8.4
26
9.0
20
8.2
29
8.9
19
8.2
29
9.1
20
7.1
29
Administration
8.7
76
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.8
79
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
78
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
9.0
78
Not enough data
8.6
72
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.8
73
Not enough data
8.6
70
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.7
197
Not enough data
8.3
190
Not enough data
8.9
204
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
138
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.7
66
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
60
Not enough data
Management
8.7
140
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
137
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
9.0
152
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
223
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
208
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
202
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.8
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
195
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Not enough data
Security
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
Value Management
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and HCL AppScan are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
HCL AppScan
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.8%
Information Technology and Services
24.3%
Computer & Network Security
13.5%
Computer Software
9.5%
Automotive
8.1%
Banking
6.8%
Other
37.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Who owns AppScan?
1 Comment
Official Response from HCL AppScan
HCL AppScan is owned by HCL Software.Read more
HCL AppScan has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
