Compare GitHub and Veracode Application Security Platform

At a Glance
GitHub
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,309)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Veracode Application Security Platform
Veracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security Platform
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that GitHub excels in collaboration features, with users highlighting the straightforward pull request system that keeps projects organized when multiple contributors are involved. This makes it a top choice for teams looking to streamline their coding processes.
  • Users say that Veracode Application Security Platform is particularly effective for identifying security vulnerabilities through its static code analysis capabilities. Reviewers appreciate its integration with GitHub, which enhances their security workflows, although they note that it may not be as user-friendly as GitHub.
  • Reviewers mention that GitHub's implementation process is quick and intuitive, with many users praising the onboarding experience. This ease of setup is a significant advantage for teams that want to get started without extensive training or configuration.
  • According to verified reviews, GitHub consistently receives higher satisfaction ratings compared to Veracode, particularly in areas like ease of use and overall quality. Users find GitHub's interface more accessible, which contributes to a smoother day-to-day experience.
  • Users highlight that while Veracode provides valuable security scanning features, its support and responsiveness can sometimes lag behind GitHub's. Reviewers appreciate GitHub's proactive support, which enhances their overall experience with the platform.
  • G2 reviewers note that GitHub is favored by small businesses, making it a popular choice for startups and smaller teams. In contrast, Veracode tends to cater more to enterprise-level clients, which may limit its appeal for smaller organizations looking for a more tailored solution.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Veracode Application Security Platform
No pricing available
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Veracode Application Security Platform
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,997
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.7
2,014
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
9.0
625
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
8.7
453
7.4
7
Quality of Support
8.7
1,596
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
389
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,948
6.3
19
Features by Category
Application Release OrchestrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.7
172
Not enough data
Administration
8.9
138
Not enough data
9.0
145
Not enough data
8.6
138
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
142
Not enough data
8.5
126
Not enough data
8.8
130
Not enough data
9.0
142
Not enough data
8.1
125
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
142
Not enough data
8.7
136
Not enough data
8.6
137
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
8.6
62
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
40
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
39
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
Testing
9.1
40
Not enough data
8.2
34
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.0
32
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
8.5
7
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Cloud Infrastructure AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.8
120
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
90
Not enough data
9.0
89
Not enough data
8.6
90
Not enough data
9.1
94
Not enough data
Automation
8.8
90
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
90
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
IT Management
8.9
93
Not enough data
8.8
84
Not enough data
8.7
79
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.8
291
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
240
Not enough data
9.2
248
Not enough data
8.8
232
Not enough data
Management
9.0
240
Not enough data
8.4
226
Not enough data
9.0
244
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.8
228
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
186
Not enough data
8.8
181
Not enough data
9.0
185
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
181
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
179
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
8.8
91
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
9.1
68
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
66
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
8.8
67
Not enough data
8.8
177
Not enough data
Management
8.8
132
Not enough data
9.1
140
Not enough data
8.6
130
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
138
Not enough data
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.6
127
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Continuous IntegrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.5
256
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
8.9
208
Not enough data
8.6
197
Not enough data
Management
8.8
217
Not enough data
8.8
212
Not enough data
8.2
202
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
8.2
25
Not enough data
8.6
211
Not enough data
Documentation
8.7
176
Not enough data
8.7
170
Not enough data
8.5
162
Not enough data
Security
8.2
158
Not enough data
8.5
160
Not enough data
8.9
170
Not enough data
Static Code AnalysisHide 3 FeaturesShow 3 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI AppSec AssistantsHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
45.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
24.1%
Veracode Application Security Platform
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
17.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
52.2%
Reviewers' Industry
GitHub
GitHub
Computer Software
32.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Internet
6.6%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Veracode Application Security Platform
Veracode Application Security Platform
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Alternatives
GitHub
GitHub Alternatives
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation...
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Jenkins
Jenkins
Add Jenkins
Veracode Application Security Platform
Veracode Application Security Platform Alternatives
Checkmarx
Checkmarx
Add Checkmarx
SonarQube
SonarQube
Add SonarQube
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
Add Invicti (formerly Netsparker)
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Discussions
GitHub
GitHub Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code - use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases - lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
Mohanendra S.
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?
4 Comments
HJ
Veracode Application Security Platform
Veracode Application Security Platform Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers