Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,266)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in ease of use with a score of 8.7, while Veracode Application Security Platform falls behind at 7.3. Reviewers mention that GitHub's intuitive interface makes it easier for teams to collaborate and manage code effectively.
- Reviewers say that GitHub's integration capabilities are robust, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services. In contrast, users on G2 note that Veracode's integration score of 8.8, while still good, does not offer the same level of flexibility and ease of use.
- Users mention that GitHub's deployment automation feature is highly rated at 8.9, making it easier for teams to streamline their release processes. Conversely, Veracode's deployment automation score of 8.5 indicates it may not be as efficient in this area, leading to potential delays in deployment.
- Reviewers say that GitHub's configuration management is rated at 8.8, which helps teams maintain consistency across their projects. In comparison, Veracode's configuration management score is not available, suggesting a lack of focus or features in this critical area.
- G2 users report that GitHub's quality of support is rated at 8.7, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. On the other hand, Veracode's support quality score of 8.0 indicates that while it is satisfactory, it may not meet the same high standards as GitHub.
- Users on G2 mention that GitHub's product direction score of 8.9 reflects a strong commitment to continuous improvement and innovation. In contrast, Veracode's score of 6.3 suggests that users may have concerns about the platform's future development and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
Veracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
Veracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,962
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.7
1,978
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
9.0
589
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
8.7
450
7.4
7
Quality of Support
8.8
1,569
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
386
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,914
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
9.2
77
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
75
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as AI AppSec Assistants, Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Scanner, Static Code Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
