Compare GitHub and TeamCity 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Starting at $45.00 3 committers Per Month
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,310)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansTeamCity
Star Rating
(86)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $45.00 3 committers Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitHub excels in collaboration, with its straightforward pull request system making it easy for teams to manage code changes effectively. Users appreciate how it integrates coding, collaboration, and version control all in one platform, which is crucial for modern software development.
- Users say that TeamCity provides solid support for continuous integration and development, particularly for unit tests. Reviewers highlight its ability to run system integration tests in a pipeline using automation, which is beneficial for maintaining code quality.
- According to verified reviews, GitHub's implementation process is notably quick and user-friendly, with many users praising its intuitive onboarding wizard. This ease of setup contrasts with TeamCity, where some users have mentioned challenges in configuration and setup time.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's extensive market presence is reflected in its high user satisfaction scores, with a significant number of recent reviews praising its features. In comparison, TeamCity has fewer recent reviews, which may indicate less current user engagement and satisfaction.
- Users highlight that TeamCity's user interface is straightforward, making it easy to navigate through pipeline lists, logs, and statuses. However, GitHub's overall user experience is rated higher, with users enjoying its seamless integration of various development tools.
- G2 reviewers note that GitHub's pricing model, starting at $0.00, makes it accessible for small businesses, which is a significant advantage over TeamCity's starting price of $45.00. This affordability allows more users to leverage GitHub's powerful features without financial barriers.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
TeamCity
Cloud
Starting at $45.00
3 committers Per Month
For cloud-native teams and newcomers to CI/CD
- Unlimited web users
- Unlimited concurrency
- Fleet of Linux, Windows and macOS build agents maintained by JetBrains
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
TeamCity
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,998
8.9
78
Ease of Use
8.7
2,015
8.1
77
Ease of Setup
9.0
626
7.2
28
Ease of Admin
8.7
453
8.1
24
Quality of Support
8.7
1,597
8.3
56
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
389
7.7
16
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,949
8.1
73
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
139
Not enough data
9.0
145
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.5
126
Not enough data
8.8
131
Not enough data
9.0
143
Not enough data
8.1
126
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
142
Not enough data
8.7
137
Not enough data
8.6
137
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
40
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
39
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
Testing
9.1
40
Not enough data
8.2
34
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.0
32
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
90
Not enough data
9.0
89
Not enough data
8.6
90
Not enough data
9.1
94
Not enough data
Automation
8.8
90
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
90
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
IT Management
8.9
93
Not enough data
8.8
84
Not enough data
8.7
79
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
240
9.1
13
9.2
248
9.0
13
8.8
232
9.0
13
Management
9.0
240
8.9
12
8.4
226
7.9
11
9.0
244
9.1
13
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.5
20
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
186
Not enough data
8.8
181
Not enough data
9.0
185
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
181
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
179
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
9.1
68
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
66
Not enough data
9.0
69
Not enough data
8.8
67
Not enough data
Management
8.8
133
Not enough data
9.1
140
Not enough data
8.6
130
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
138
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
8.6
127
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
8.6
13
|
Verified
8.9
208
9.0
13
|
Verified
8.6
197
7.7
14
|
Verified
Management
8.8
217
8.1
14
|
Verified
8.8
212
9.2
12
|
Verified
8.2
202
8.0
11
|
Verified
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
8.2
25
Not enough data
Documentation
8.7
177
Not enough data
8.7
170
Not enough data
8.5
162
Not enough data
Security
8.2
158
Not enough data
8.5
160
Not enough data
8.9
170
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and TeamCity are categorized as Continuous Delivery, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, and Build Automation
Unique Categories
TeamCity has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
TeamCity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
32.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Internet
6.6%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Information Technology and Services
21.4%
Computer Software
20.2%
Internet
10.7%
Financial Services
4.8%
Marketing and Advertising
4.8%
Other
38.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
How is GitHub shaping the landscape of collaborative software development and version control?
4 Comments
HJ
Good Read more
What is the use of TeamCity?
1 Comment
Official Response from TeamCity
TeamCity is used to build and test software products in an automated manner. It provides rapid feedback on every code change, reduces code integration...Read more
What is TeamCity used for?
1 Comment
Official Response from TeamCity
TeamCity is a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) solution that is used to build and test software products in an automated manner. It...Read more
What is the difference between Jenkins and TeamCity?
1 Comment
Official Response from TeamCity
TeamCity offers a more out-of-the-box, user-friendly experience. It provides a visual and intuitive interface for configuring builds, making it easier for...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
