Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and SOOS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Mid-Market (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Free
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,264)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSOOS
Star Rating
(42)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services. In contrast, SOOS also performs well with a score of 9.5, but users mention that its integrations are more tailored for security-focused workflows.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, making it user-friendly for developers of all skill levels. However, SOOS shines with a higher score of 9.3, indicating that its interface is particularly intuitive for managing software composition analysis.
- G2 users highlight that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, which is satisfactory but can sometimes be slow. In contrast, SOOS has a higher score of 9.3, with users praising its responsive support team and comprehensive documentation.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Configuration Management features score 8.8, providing solid options for managing repositories. However, SOOS offers a more robust approach with a score of 9.5, particularly in managing security configurations effectively.
- Reviewers say that GitHub's Deployment Automation features are rated at 8.9, which is beneficial for CI/CD processes. SOOS, however, stands out with a score of 9.0, with users noting its advanced automation capabilities that enhance deployment efficiency.
- Users report that GitHub's Bug Reporting functionality scores 8.9, which is effective but lacks some advanced features. In contrast, SOOS scores 9.0, with reviewers mentioning its comprehensive bug tracking and reporting tools that facilitate better issue management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
SOOS
SOOS Community Edition
Free
Our no-hassle enrollment process and easy-to-setup GitHub integration, brings practical supply chain security to the masses. Use our SCA tool with any public GitHub repository!
- All features of SOOS SCA
- Scan Node, Ruby, Python, Java, & more (17 pkg managers and languages)
- Robust license policies
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
SOOS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,962
8.8
29
Ease of Use
8.7
1,978
9.3
32
Ease of Setup
9.0
589
9.1
19
Ease of Admin
8.7
450
9.3
18
Quality of Support
8.8
1,569
9.3
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
386
9.1
17
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,914
9.6
30
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
8.3
7
Analysis
Not enough data
7.6
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
13
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
6.1
9
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
97
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
99
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
9.5
10
9.1
78
9.5
17
9.2
77
9.4
14
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
9.0
14
9.1
78
9.3
15
8.9
75
9.1
15
API Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
136
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
138
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
184
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and SOOS are categorized as Software Composition Analysis
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SOOS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.3%
Information Technology and Services
27.5%
Computer Software
20.0%
Real Estate
5.0%
Pharmaceuticals
5.0%
Logistics and Supply Chain
5.0%
Other
37.5%
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
SOOS has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
