Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and SonarQube 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Free
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,267)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansSonarQube
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Ease of Setup with a score of 9.0, making it straightforward for teams to get started quickly, while SonarQube, with a score of 8.0, is noted for having a more complex initial configuration process.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's API / Integrations capabilities are robust, scoring 8.8, allowing seamless connections with various tools, whereas SonarQube's score of 7.7 indicates fewer integration options, which can limit flexibility for some users.
- Users on G2 highlight GitHub's superior Quality of Support with a score of 8.7, often praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, compared to SonarQube's score of 8.2, where users have reported slower response times.
- Reviewers say that GitHub shines in Extensibility with a score of 8.8, allowing users to customize their workflows extensively, while SonarQube's lower score of 6.0 suggests limitations in this area, making it less adaptable for specific user needs.
- Users report that GitHub's Static Code Analysis features, scoring 8.3, are effective for identifying issues early in the development process, while SonarQube, despite a higher score of 8.9, is noted for its depth in code quality metrics, which some users find overwhelming.
- G2 users mention that GitHub's Feedback mechanisms, scoring 8.8, facilitate better collaboration among team members, whereas SonarQube's score of 7.6 indicates that its feedback features could be more user-friendly and integrated into the workflow.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
SonarQube
Community Edition
Free
Explore: https://www.sonarsource.com/plans-and-pricing/
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
Free Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
SonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,964
8.8
108
Ease of Use
8.7
1,980
8.5
111
Ease of Setup
9.0
591
8.1
70
Ease of Admin
8.7
451
8.5
63
Quality of Support
8.8
1,571
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
387
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,916
8.6
105
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
Not enough data
9.1
147
Not enough data
8.7
144
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.6
134
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
9.0
147
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
146
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
48
7.8
19
9.0
47
6.0
20
Analysis
8.7
47
7.4
21
8.9
50
8.0
20
8.9
48
8.9
22
9.0
50
9.0
22
Testing
9.3
49
6.6
18
8.6
44
5.9
19
8.7
45
6.0
21
8.9
43
6.9
18
8.7
42
6.8
17
9.0
43
8.2
21
8.5
42
6.9
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
97
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
241
Not enough data
8.9
238
Not enough data
Management
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.5
231
Not enough data
9.0
239
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
7.7
10
8.9
188
8.0
10
9.0
192
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
7.8
10
8.9
196
8.2
10
9.0
184
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
137
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
185
7.7
35
8.8
179
7.6
35
8.6
170
8.2
36
Security
8.3
167
6.9
33
8.6
168
7.0
32
9.0
177
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and SonarQube are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Bug Tracking, and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.2%
Information Technology and Services
26.6%
Computer Software
21.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
